Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring - PubMed
Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring
Robert Ariel et al. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug.
Abstract
Theories of self-regulated study assume that learners monitor item difficulty when making decisions about which items to select for study. To complement such theories, the authors propose an agenda-based regulation (ABR) model in which learners' study decisions are guided by an agenda that learners develop to prioritize items for study, given their goals and task constraints. Across 4 experiments, the authors orthogonally manipulated 1 task constraint-the reward structure of the task-with objective item difficulty, so that learners could use either item difficulty or potential reward in deciding how to allocate their study time. Learners studied items, were tested, and then selected half the items for restudy. As predicted by the ABR model, reward structure drove item selection more than did item difficulty, which demonstrates learners' agendas can override the effects of monitoring item difficulty in the allocation of study time.
Similar articles
-
The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.
Dunlosky J, Ariel R. Dunlosky J, et al. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):899-912. doi: 10.1037/a0023064. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21480756
-
Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.
Toppino TC, Cohen MS. Toppino TC, et al. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1480-91. doi: 10.1037/a0020949. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010. PMID: 20822306 Clinical Trial.
-
Multiple roles for time in short-term memory: evidence from serial recall of order and timing.
Farrell S. Farrell S. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):128-45. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.128. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008. PMID: 18194059
-
Decision making, impulsivity and time perception.
Wittmann M, Paulus MP. Wittmann M, et al. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jan;12(1):7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008. PMID: 18042423 Review.
-
Interactions of attention, emotion and motivation.
Raymond J. Raymond J. Prog Brain Res. 2009;176:293-308. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17617-3. Prog Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19733764 Review.
Cited by
-
Hertzog C, Price J, Murray R. Hertzog C, et al. Psychol Aging. 2020 Dec;35(8):1059-1072. doi: 10.1037/pag0000574. Epub 2020 Oct 1. Psychol Aging. 2020. PMID: 33001664 Free PMC article.
-
Wang F, Qin Q, Jiang Y. Wang F, et al. Front Psychol. 2016 May 3;7:639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00639. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27199865 Free PMC article.
-
Toppino TC, LaVan MH, Iaconelli RT. Toppino TC, et al. Mem Cognit. 2018 Oct;46(7):1164-1177. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0828-2. Mem Cognit. 2018. PMID: 29845590
-
Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
Little JL, McDaniel MA. Little JL, et al. Mem Cognit. 2015 Jan;43(1):85-98. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0453-7. Mem Cognit. 2015. PMID: 25135813
-
Recognizing What Matters: Value Improves Recognition by Selectively Enhancing Recollection.
Hennessee JP, Castel AD, Knowlton BJ. Hennessee JP, et al. J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 6. J Mem Lang. 2017. PMID: 28827894 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials