Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial - PubMed
- ️Thu Jan 01 2009
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1694-702.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297-6. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
Anna Lena Lopez, Suman Kanungo, Allison Paisley, Byomkesh Manna, Mohammad Ali, Swapan K Niyogi, Jin Kyung Park, Banawarilal Sarkar, Mahesh K Puri, Deok Ryun Kim, Jacqueline L Deen, Jan Holmgren, Rodney Carbis, Raman Rao, Thu Van Nguyen, Allan Donner, Nirmal K Ganguly, G Balakrish Nair, Sujit K Bhattacharya, John D Clemens
Affiliations
- PMID: 19819004
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297-6
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Dipika Sur et al. Lancet. 2009.
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2010 Oct 23;376(9750):1392
Abstract
Background: Oral cholera vaccines consisting of killed whole cells have been available for many years, but they have not been used extensively in populations with endemic disease. An inexpensive, locally produced oral killed-whole-cell vaccine has been used in high-risk areas in Vietnam. To expand the use of this vaccine, it was modified to comply with WHO standards. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this modified vaccine in a population with endemic cholera.
Methods: In this double-blind trial, 107 774 non-pregnant residents of Kolkata, India, aged 1 year or older, were cluster-randomised by dwelling to receive two doses of either modified killed-whole-cell cholera vaccine (n=52 212; 1966 clusters) or heat-killed Escherichia coli K12 placebo (n=55 562; 1967 clusters), both delivered orally. Randomisation was done by computer-generated sequence in blocks of four. The primary endpoint was prevention of episodes of culture-confirmed Vibrio cholerae O1 diarrhoea severe enough for the patient to seek treatment in a health-care facility. We undertook an interim, per-protocol analysis at 2 years of follow-up that included individuals who received two completely ingested doses of vaccine or placebo. We assessed first episodes of cholera that occurred between 14 days and 730 days after receipt of the second dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00289224.
Findings: 31 932 participants assigned to vaccine (1721 clusters) and 34 968 assigned to placebo (1757 clusters) received two doses of study treatment. There were 20 episodes of cholera in the vaccine group and 68 episodes in the placebo group (protective efficacy 67%; one-tailed 99% CI, lower bound 35%, p<0.0001). The vaccine protected individuals in age-groups 1.0-4.9 years, 5.0-14.9 years, and 15 years and older, and protective efficacy did not differ significantly between age-groups (p=0.28). We recorded no vaccine-related serious adverse events.
Interpretation: This modified killed-whole-cell oral vaccine, compliant with WHO standards, is safe, provides protection against clinically significant cholera in an endemic setting, and can be used in children aged 1.0-4.9 years, who are at highest risk of developing cholera in endemic settings.
Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Governments of South Korea, Sweden, and Kuwait.
Comment in
-
An affordable cholera vaccine: an important step forward.
Sridhar S. Sridhar S. Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1658-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61418-5. Epub 2009 Oct 8. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19819005 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Bhattacharya SK, Sur D, Ali M, Kanungo S, You YA, Manna B, Sah B, Niyogi SK, Park JK, Sarkar B, Puri MK, Kim DR, Deen JL, Holmgren J, Carbis R, Dhingra MS, Donner A, Nair GB, Lopez AL, Wierzba TF, Clemens JD. Bhattacharya SK, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;13(12):1050-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70273-1. Epub 2013 Oct 18. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 24140390 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of a Single-Dose, Inactivated Oral Cholera Vaccine in Bangladesh.
Qadri F, Wierzba TF, Ali M, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Saha A, Khan IA, Asaduzzaman M, Akter A, Khan A, Begum YA, Bhuiyan TR, Khanam F, Chowdhury MI, Islam T, Chowdhury AI, Rahman A, Siddique SA, You YA, Kim DR, Siddik AU, Saha NC, Kabir A, Cravioto A, Desai SN, Singh AP, Clemens JD. Qadri F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016 May 5;374(18):1723-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510330. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27144848 Clinical Trial.
-
Field trial of a locally produced, killed, oral cholera vaccine in Vietnam.
Trach DD, Clemens JD, Ke NT, Thuy HT, Son ND, Canh DG, Hang PV, Rao MR. Trach DD, et al. Lancet. 1997 Jan 25;349(9047):231-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)06107-7. Lancet. 1997. PMID: 9014909 Clinical Trial.
-
Cholera vaccine: new preventive tool for endemic countries.
Verma R, Khanna P, Chawla S. Verma R, et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 May;8(5):682-4. doi: 10.4161/hv.19083. Epub 2012 May 1. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012. PMID: 22634452 Review.
-
Oral vaccines for preventing cholera.
Sinclair D, Abba K, Zaman K, Qadri F, Graves PM. Sinclair D, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD008603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008603.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. PMID: 21412922 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Mahapatra T, Mahapatra S, Pal D, Saha J, Lopez A, Ali M, Bannerjee B, Manna B, Sur D, Bhattacharya S, Kanungo S. Mahapatra T, et al. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(1):182-6. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1066052. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016. PMID: 26224251 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The case for reactive mass oral cholera vaccinations.
Reyburn R, Deen JL, Grais RF, Bhattacharya SK, Sur D, Lopez AL, Jiddawi MS, Clemens JD, von Seidlein L. Reyburn R, et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Jan 25;5(1):e952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000952. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011. PMID: 21283614 Free PMC article.
-
Critical analysis of compositions and protective efficacies of oral killed cholera vaccines.
Kabir S. Kabir S. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014 Sep;21(9):1195-205. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00378-14. Epub 2014 Jul 23. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014. PMID: 25056361 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The impact of spatial arrangements on epidemic disease dynamics and intervention strategies.
Kelly MR Jr, Tien JH, Eisenberg MC, Lenhart S. Kelly MR Jr, et al. J Biol Dyn. 2016;10:222-49. doi: 10.1080/17513758.2016.1156172. J Biol Dyn. 2016. PMID: 26981710 Free PMC article.
-
Aktar A, Rahman MA, Afrin S, Faruk MO, Uddin T, Akter A, Sami MIN, Yasmin T, Chowdhury F, Khan AI, Leung DT, LaRocque RC, Charles RC, Bhuiyan TR, Mandlik A, Kelly M, Kováč P, Xu P, Calderwood SB, Harris JB, Qadri F, Ryan ET. Aktar A, et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016 May 6;23(5):427-435. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00647-15. Print 2016 May. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2016. PMID: 27009211 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical