Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories - PubMed
- ️Thu Jan 01 2009
. 2009 Dec 17;462(7275):915-9.
doi: 10.1038/nature08389. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
Affiliations
- PMID: 19946267
- PMCID: PMC2844762
- DOI: 10.1038/nature08389
Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories
Tonghui Xu et al. Nature. 2009.
Abstract
Novel motor skills are learned through repetitive practice and, once acquired, persist long after training stops. Earlier studies have shown that such learning induces an increase in the efficacy of synapses in the primary motor cortex, the persistence of which is associated with retention of the task. However, how motor learning affects neuronal circuitry at the level of individual synapses and how long-lasting memory is structurally encoded in the intact brain remain unknown. Here we show that synaptic connections in the living mouse brain rapidly respond to motor-skill learning and permanently rewire. Training in a forelimb reaching task leads to rapid (within an hour) formation of postsynaptic dendritic spines on the output pyramidal neurons in the contralateral motor cortex. Although selective elimination of spines that existed before training gradually returns the overall spine density back to the original level, the new spines induced during learning are preferentially stabilized during subsequent training and endure long after training stops. Furthermore, we show that different motor skills are encoded by different sets of synapses. Practice of novel, but not previously learned, tasks further promotes dendritic spine formation in adulthood. Our findings reveal that rapid, but long-lasting, synaptic reorganization is closely associated with motor learning. The data also suggest that stabilized neuronal connections are the foundation of durable motor memory.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6813/2844762/5245b7bcffe6/nihms182438f1.gif)
a, A cartoon of motor training. b, Average success rates during training for learning and non-learning mice (mean ± s.e.m., 42 learners and 5 no learners). c, An intracortical microstimulation map indicates that the imaged region is within the motor cortex. Scale bar, 1 mm. d, e, Repeated imaging of the same dendritic branches over one-day intervals reveals spine elimination (arrows) and formation (arrowheads), and filopodia (asterisks) in a general control (d) and a trained (e) mouse. Scale bar, 2 μm. f, Percentage of spines formed and eliminated under various control and training conditions immediately following the first training session (mean ± s.d., ***P < 0.001). g, The degree of spine formation observed following the first training session is linearly correlated with the number of successful reaches during this session (r2 = 0.77).
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6813/2844762/f008786cdca5/nihms182438f2.gif)
a, b, Percentage of spines formed (a) and eliminated (b) under control and training conditions. c, Total spine number increases during initial learning, but returns to normal levels with prolonged training. d, e, Imaging of the same dendritic branches over 4 days in the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (d) and the contralateral sensory cortex (e) of the trained mice. f, Imaging of the same dendritic branches over 4 days in the contralateral motor cortex of a mouse that failed to learn the task. Data are presented as mean ± s.d., *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Scale bar, 2 μm.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6813/2844762/6366fad7cebd/nihms182438f3.gif)
a, Timeline of experiments, showing possible outcomes. b, c, Repeated imaging of dendritic branches at 0, 4 and 120 days in a control (b) and a trained (c) mouse. Scale bar, 2 μm. d, Percentages of surviving new and pre-existing spines, as a function of time, for control and trained animals (mean ± s.d., *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001). Numbers of animals examined at each time point are indicated below new spine data points.
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6813/2844762/d89b99855303/nihms182438f4.gif)
a, Pre-trained mice start with high success rates during adult retraining (mean ± s.e.m., 10 naive trained and 14 retrained adults).b–f, Repetitive imaging of dendritic branches over 4 days in a control adult (b), naive adults training with the reaching task (c) and capellini handling task (d), and pre-trained adults retraining with the same reaching task and the new capellini handling task (f). Scale bar, 2 μm. g, Percentages of spines formed and eliminated over 4 days in adult mice under different conditions (mean ± s.d., ***P < 0.001).
Comment in
-
Neuroscience: New tricks and old spines.
Ziv NE, Ahissar E. Ziv NE, et al. Nature. 2009 Dec 17;462(7275):859-61. doi: 10.1038/462859a. Nature. 2009. PMID: 20016588 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Stably maintained dendritic spines are associated with lifelong memories.
Yang G, Pan F, Gan WB. Yang G, et al. Nature. 2009 Dec 17;462(7275):920-4. doi: 10.1038/nature08577. Epub 2009 Nov 29. Nature. 2009. PMID: 19946265 Free PMC article.
-
Repetitive motor learning induces coordinated formation of clustered dendritic spines in vivo.
Fu M, Yu X, Lu J, Zuo Y. Fu M, et al. Nature. 2012 Feb 19;483(7387):92-5. doi: 10.1038/nature10844. Nature. 2012. PMID: 22343892 Free PMC article.
-
Neuroscience: New tricks and old spines.
Ziv NE, Ahissar E. Ziv NE, et al. Nature. 2009 Dec 17;462(7275):859-61. doi: 10.1038/462859a. Nature. 2009. PMID: 20016588 No abstract available.
-
Spine plasticity in the motor cortex.
Yu X, Zuo Y. Yu X, et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Feb;21(1):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.07.010. Epub 2010 Aug 20. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011. PMID: 20728341 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mechanisms of motor learning mediated by synaptic plasticity in rat primary motor cortex.
Kida H, Mitsushima D. Kida H, et al. Neurosci Res. 2018 Mar;128:14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 23. Neurosci Res. 2018. PMID: 28951322 Review.
Cited by
-
Tian W, Chen S. Tian W, et al. Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 25;12:616820. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.616820. eCollection 2021. Front Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33716924 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dietary cholesterol alters memory and synaptic structural plasticity in young rat brain.
Ya BL, Liu WY, Ge F, Zhang YX, Zhu BL, Bai B. Ya BL, et al. Neurol Sci. 2013 Aug;34(8):1355-65. doi: 10.1007/s10072-012-1241-4. Epub 2012 Nov 28. Neurol Sci. 2013. PMID: 23187788
-
Wieder N, Fink R, von Wegner F. Wieder N, et al. Biophys J. 2015 Feb 3;108(3):557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.3458. Biophys J. 2015. PMID: 25650923 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid production of new oligodendrocytes is required in the earliest stages of motor-skill learning.
Xiao L, Ohayon D, McKenzie IA, Sinclair-Wilson A, Wright JL, Fudge AD, Emery B, Li H, Richardson WD. Xiao L, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2016 Sep;19(9):1210-1217. doi: 10.1038/nn.4351. Epub 2016 Jul 25. Nat Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27455109 Free PMC article.
-
Frias ES, Hoseini MS, Krukowski K, Paladini MS, Grue K, Ureta G, Rienecker KDA, Walter P, Stryker MP, Rosi S. Frias ES, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Oct 18;119(42):e2209427119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209427119. Epub 2022 Oct 13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 36227915 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Luft AR, Buitrago MM. Stages of motor skill learning. Mol Neurobiol. 2005;32:205–216. - PubMed
-
- Karni A, et al. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature. 1995;377:155–158. - PubMed
-
- Rioult-Pedotti MS, Donoghue JP, Dunaevsky A. Plasticity of the synaptic modification range. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:3688–3695. - PubMed
-
- Rioult-Pedotti MS, Friedman D, Donoghue JP. Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. Science. 2000;290:533–536. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical