Respect for rational autonomy - PubMed

Respect for rational autonomy

Rebecca L Walker. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

The standard notion of autonomy in medical ethics does not require that autonomous choices not be irrational. The paper gives three examples of seemingly irrational patient choices and discusses how a rational autonomy analysis differs from the standard view. It then considers whether a switch to the rational autonomy view would lead to overriding more patient decisions but concludes that this should not be the case. Rather, a determination of whether individual patient decisions are autonomous is much less relevant than usually considered in determining whether health care providers must abide by these decisions. Furthermore, respect for rational autonomy entails strong positive requirements of respect for the autonomy of the person as a rational decision maker. The rationality view of autonomy is conceptually stronger than the standard view, allows for a more nuanced understanding of the practical moral calculus involved in respecting patient autonomy, and promotes positive respect for patient autonomy.

Similar articles

• Market liberalism in health care: a dysfunctional view of respecting "consumer" autonomy.

  Kekewich MA. Kekewich MA. J Bioeth Inq. 2014 Mar;11(1):21-9. doi: 10.1007/s11673-013-9492-1. Epub 2013 Dec 21. J Bioeth Inq. 2014. PMID: 24363176

• Should healthcare professionals respect autonomy just because it promotes welfare?

  Molyneux D. Molyneux D. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr;35(4):245-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024968. J Med Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19332582

• The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery.

  Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Chervenak FA, et al. Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(7):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.682639. Am J Bioeth. 2012. PMID: 22694022 No abstract available.

• Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships.

  Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery K. Entwistle VA, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul;25(7):741-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2. Epub 2010 Mar 6. J Gen Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20213206 Free PMC article. Review.

• Artificial nutrition: dilemmas in decision-making.

  Planas M, Camilo ME. Planas M, et al. Clin Nutr. 2002 Aug;21(4):355-61. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2002.0549. Clin Nutr. 2002. PMID: 12211177 Review.

Cited by

• Unexpected Complications of Novel Deep Brain Stimulation Treatments: Ethical Issues and Clinical Recommendations.

  Maslen H, Cheeran B, Pugh J, Pycroft L, Boccard S, Prangnell S, Green AL, FitzGerald J, Savulescu J, Aziz T. Maslen H, et al. Neuromodulation. 2018 Feb;21(2):135-143. doi: 10.1111/ner.12613. Epub 2017 May 30. Neuromodulation. 2018. PMID: 28557242 Free PMC article. Review.

• The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa.

  Maslen H, Pugh J, Savulescu J. Maslen H, et al. Neuroethics. 2015;8(3):215-230. doi: 10.1007/s12152-015-9240-9. Epub 2015 Sep 24. Neuroethics. 2015. PMID: 26594256 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Project MUSE

• Medical

  • MedlinePlus Health Information