Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives - PubMed
Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives
J A Coyne et al. Genet Res. 1991 Apr.
Abstract
We conducted classical genetic analysis of the difference in male genitalia and hybrid sterility between the island-dwelling sibling species Drosophila sechellia and D. mauritiana. At least two loci (one on each autosome) are responsible for the genital difference, with the X chromosome having no significant effect. In contrast, male hybrid sterility is caused by at least four gene loci distributed among all major chromosomes, with those on the X chromosome having the largest effect. We also show that the large difference in ovariole number between D. sechellia and its mainland relative D. simulans is due to at least two gene substitutions, one on each major autosome. The X and the left arm of the second chromosome, however, have no significant effect on the character. This implies that the evolution of reduced ovariole number involved relatively few gene substitutions. These results extend previous findings that morphological differences between Drosophila species are caused by genes distributed among all chromosomes, while hybrid sterility and inviability are due primarily to X-linked genes. Because strong X-effects on male sterility have been found in all three pairwise hybridizations among D. simulans, D. sechellia and D. mauritiana, these effects must have evolved at least twice independently.
Similar articles
-
Davis AW, Noonburg EG, Wu CI. Davis AW, et al. Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):191-9. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.1.191. Genetics. 1994. PMID: 8056310 Free PMC article.
-
Araripe LO, Tao Y, Lemos B. Araripe LO, et al. Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Jun;116(6):516-22. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.11. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Heredity (Edinb). 2016. PMID: 26980343 Free PMC article.
-
Presgraves DC, Meiklejohn CD. Presgraves DC, et al. Front Genet. 2021 Jun 23;12:669045. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.669045. eCollection 2021. Front Genet. 2021. PMID: 34249091 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in the genetics of reproductive isolation in Drosophila.
Zouros E. Zouros E. Genome. 1989;31(1):211-20. doi: 10.1139/g89-036. Genome. 1989. PMID: 2687092 Review.
Cited by
-
High-resolution genome-wide dissection of the two rules of speciation in Drosophila.
Masly JP, Presgraves DC. Masly JP, et al. PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep;5(9):e243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050243. PLoS Biol. 2007. PMID: 17850182 Free PMC article.
-
Liu J, Mercer JM, Stam LF, Gibson GC, Zeng ZB, Laurie CC. Liu J, et al. Genetics. 1996 Apr;142(4):1129-45. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.4.1129. Genetics. 1996. PMID: 8846893 Free PMC article.
-
Drosophila biology in the genomic age.
Markow TA, O'Grady PM. Markow TA, et al. Genetics. 2007 Nov;177(3):1269-76. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.074112. Genetics. 2007. PMID: 18039866 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sánchez L, Santamaria P. Sánchez L, et al. Genetics. 1997 Sep;147(1):231-42. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.1.231. Genetics. 1997. PMID: 9286683 Free PMC article.
-
Support for the Dominance Theory in Drosophila Transcriptomes.
Llopart A, Brud E, Pettie N, Comeron JM. Llopart A, et al. Genetics. 2018 Oct;210(2):703-718. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301229. Epub 2018 Aug 21. Genetics. 2018. PMID: 30131345 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Molecular Biology Databases