Epigenetic upregulation of urokinase plasminogen activator promotes the tropism of mesenchymal stem cells for tumor cells - PubMed
Epigenetic upregulation of urokinase plasminogen activator promotes the tropism of mesenchymal stem cells for tumor cells
Sai Murali Krishna Pulukuri et al. Mol Cancer Res. 2010 Aug.
Abstract
A major obstacle for the effective treatment of cancer is the invasive capacity of the tumor cells. Previous studies have shown the capability of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) to target these disseminated tumor cells and to serve as therapeutic delivery vehicles. However, the molecular mechanisms that would enhance the migration of MSCs toward tumor areas are not well understood. In particular, very little is known about the role that epigenetic mechanisms play in cell migration and tropism of MSCs. In this study, we investigated whether histone deacetylation was involved in the repression of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) expression in MSCs derived from umbilical cord blood (CB) and bone marrow (BM). Induction of uPA expression by histone deacetylase inhibitors trichostatin A and sodium butyrate was observed in CB- and BM-derived MSCs examined. In vitro migration assays showed that induction of uPA expression by histone deacetylase inhibitors in CB- and BM-derived MSCs significantly enhanced tumor tropism of these cells. Furthermore, overexpression of uPA in CB-MSCs induced migration capacity toward human cancer cells in vitro. In addition, our results showed that uPA-uPAR knockdown in PC3 prostate cancer cells significantly inhibited tumor-specific migration of uPA-overexpressing MSCs. These results have significant implications for the development of MSC-mediated, tumor-selective gene therapies.
Figures

(A) Nuclear extracts were isolated from control and TSA-treated CB- and BM-MSCs, and immunoblot analysis was performed using anti-acetyl histone H3, anti-acetyl histone H4, and histone H3 antibodies. Histone H3 was utilized as a loading control. (B) Densitometric analysis of immunoblots. Data are normalized to H3, averaged, and expressed as percentage of control (CTL = 1). (C) Schematic representation of the uPA promoter region and the location of primers used for PCR amplification in the ChIP assay. Bent arrow, transcriptional start site. (D) Chromatin fragments from CB- and BM-MSCs cultured with (+) or without (−) TSA for 16 hrs were immunoprecipitated with antibody to acetylated (Ac) histones H3 and H4 or control normal rabbit serum (NRS).

(A) uPA mRNA expression (top) and activity levels (bottom) in control and TSA-treated CB- and BM-MSCs were analyzed by RT-PCR and fibrin zymography, respectively. (B) uPA mRNA expression (top) and activity levels (bottom) in control and SB-treated CB- and BM-MSCs were analyzed by RT-PCR and fibrin zymography, respectively. (C) The migration capacity of the control and TSA-treated CB-MSCs toward human cancer cells PC3 and MDA231 were assessed in vitro by transwell migration assay. Columns, percentage of the DMEM control (*p <0.05); bars, SD. (D) The migration capacity of the control and TSA-treated CB-MSCs toward non-tumor cells RWPE1 and HEK293 were assessed as described in (C).

(A) RT-PCR (top) and immunoblot (bottom) analyses of CB-MSCs stably transduced with mock, uPA expression vector or empty vector. GAPDH was used as loading control for RNA and protein analysis. (B) The migration capacity of the uPA-overexpressing MSCs toward PC3 cells was assessed in vitro by transwell migration assay. Columns, percentage of the vector control (*p <0.05); bars, SD. (C) The migration capacity of the uPA-overexpressing MSCs toward MDA-231 and U251 was assessed as described in (B). (D) The migration capacity of the uPA-overexpressing MSCs toward RWPE1 and HEK293 was assessed as described in (B).

(A) Immunoblot analysis shows increased levels of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in uPA-expressing MSCs (uPA-10). GAPDH was used as a loading control. (B) Pretreatment of ERK inhibitor significantly decreased uPA-expressing MSC migration toward PC3 and MDA231 cells compared with cells treated with nonspecific isotype IgG. Columns, percentage of the vector control (*p <0.05); bars, SD.

(A) uPA and uPAR mRNA expression in RWPE1, HEK293, U251, MDA231 and PC3 cells were analyzed by quantitative RT-PCR. (B) Immunoblot analysis of uPA and uPAR proteins in HEK293, U251, MDA231 and PC3 cells. GAPDH was used as a loading control.

The migration capacity of the uPA-overexpressing MSCs (uPA-10) toward shRNA-transfected PC3 cells was assessed in vitro by transwell migration assay. Columns, percentage of the vector control (*p <0.05); bars, SD.
Similar articles
-
Gutova M, Najbauer J, Frank RT, Kendall SE, Gevorgyan A, Metz MZ, Guevorkian M, Edmiston M, Zhao D, Glackin CA, Kim SU, Aboody KS. Gutova M, et al. Stem Cells. 2008 Jun;26(6):1406-13. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0141. Epub 2008 Apr 10. Stem Cells. 2008. PMID: 18403751
-
Pulukuri SM, Gorantla B, Rao JS. Pulukuri SM, et al. J Biol Chem. 2007 Dec 7;282(49):35594-603. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705867200. Epub 2007 Oct 8. J Biol Chem. 2007. PMID: 17923479 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Pulukuri SM, Gondi CS, Lakka SS, Jutla A, Estes N, Gujrati M, Rao JS. Pulukuri SM, et al. J Biol Chem. 2005 Oct 28;280(43):36529-40. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503111200. Epub 2005 Aug 26. J Biol Chem. 2005. PMID: 16127174 Free PMC article. Retracted.
-
Urokinase Type Plasminogen Activator and the Molecular Mechanisms of its Regulation in Cancer.
Santibanez JF. Santibanez JF. Protein Pept Lett. 2017;24(10):936-946. doi: 10.2174/0929866524666170818161132. Protein Pept Lett. 2017. PMID: 28820062 Review.
-
Targeting uPA/uPAR in prostate cancer.
Li Y, Cozzi PJ. Li Y, et al. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Oct;33(6):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jul 19. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007. PMID: 17658220 Review.
Cited by
-
Sanmartin MC, Borzone FR, Giorello MB, Yannarelli G, Chasseing NA. Sanmartin MC, et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Apr 14;10:882545. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.882545. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 35497332 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Double-edged sword of mesenchymal stem cells: Cancer-promoting versus therapeutic potential.
Lee HY, Hong IS. Lee HY, et al. Cancer Sci. 2017 Oct;108(10):1939-1946. doi: 10.1111/cas.13334. Epub 2017 Aug 29. Cancer Sci. 2017. PMID: 28756624 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Modulating the Breast Cancer Microenvironment.
Zhang L. Zhang L. Cell Transplant. 2023 Jan-Dec;32:9636897231220073. doi: 10.1177/09636897231220073. Cell Transplant. 2023. PMID: 38135917 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guo H, Ling C, Ma YY, Zhou LX, Zhao L. Guo H, et al. Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Jun 19;8:1503-9. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S80634. eCollection 2015. Onco Targets Ther. 2015. PMID: 26150727 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lu JJ, Guo H, Gao B, Zhang Y, Lin QL, Shi J, Liu JJ, Liu J. Lu JJ, et al. Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan;8(1):127-132. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1484. Epub 2017 Nov 3. Mol Clin Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29387404 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rao JS. Molecular mechanisms of glioma invasiveness: the role of proteases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:489–501. - PubMed
-
- Buzanska L, Machaj EK, Zablocka B, Pojda Z, Domanska-Janik K. Human cord blood-derived cells attain neuronal and glial features in vitro. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:2131–8. - PubMed
-
- Kramm CM, Sena-Esteves M, Barnett FH, et al. Gene therapy for brain tumors. Brain Pathol. 1995;5:345–81. - PubMed
-
- Nakamizo A, Marini F, Amano T, et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of gliomas. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3307–18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous