Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions - PubMed
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):432-6.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X10391672. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
Affiliations
- PMID: 21191122
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10391672
Randomized Controlled Trial
Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions
Ellen Peters et al. Med Decis Making. 2011 May-Jun.
Abstract
Background: Given the importance of effective patient communication, findings about influences on risk perception in nonmedical domains need replication in medical domains.
Objective: To examine whether numeracy influences risk perceptions when different information frames and number formats are used to present medication risks.
Methods: The authors manipulated the frame and number format of risk information in a 3 (frame: positive, negative, combined) × 2 (number format: frequency, percentage) design. Participants from an Internet sample (N = 298), randomly assigned to condition, responded to a single, hypothetical scenario. The main effects and interactions of numeracy, framing, and number format on risk perception were measured.
Results: Participants given the positive frame perceived the medication as less risky than those given the negative frame. Mean risk perceptions for the combined frame fell between the positive and negative frames. Numeracy did not moderate these framing effects. Risk perceptions also varied by number format and numeracy, with less-numerate participants given risk information in a percentage format perceiving the medication as less risky than when given risk information in a frequency format; highly numerate participants perceived similar risks in both formats. The generalizability of the findings is limited due to the use of non-patients, presented a hypothetical scenario. Given the design, one cannot know whether observed differences would translate into clinically significant differences in patient behaviors.
Conclusions: Frequency formats appear to increase risk perceptions over percentage formats for less-numerate respondents. Health communicators need to be aware that different formats generate different risk perceptions among patients varying in numeracy.
Comment in
-
Deceiving and informing: the risky business of risk perception.
Schwartz A. Schwartz A. Med Decis Making. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):378-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11406873. Med Decis Making. 2011. PMID: 21610259 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of risk communication formats on risk perception depending on numeracy.
Keller C, Siegrist M. Keller C, et al. Med Decis Making. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):483-90. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09333122. Epub 2009 Jun 12. Med Decis Making. 2009. PMID: 19525484
-
Presenting Numeric Information with Percentages and Descriptive Risk Labels: A Randomized Trial.
Sinayev A, Peters E, Tusler M, Fraenkel L. Sinayev A, et al. Med Decis Making. 2015 Nov;35(8):937-47. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15584922. Epub 2015 May 7. Med Decis Making. 2015. PMID: 25952743 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving risk literacy in surgeons.
Garcia-Retamero R, Cokely ET, Wicki B, Joeris A. Garcia-Retamero R, et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1156-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Patient Educ Couns. 2016. PMID: 26879804
-
Numeracy and Risk Literacy: What Have We Learned so Far?
Garcia-Retamero R, Sobkow A, Petrova D, Garrido D, Traczyk J. Garcia-Retamero R, et al. Span J Psychol. 2019 Mar 20;22:E10. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2019.16. Span J Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30892170 Review.
-
How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
Reyna VF, Nelson WL, Han PK, Dieckmann NF. Reyna VF, et al. Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;135(6):943-73. doi: 10.1037/a0017327. Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19883143 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Potential negative impact of informing patients about medication side effects: a systematic review.
Jose J, AlHajri L. Jose J, et al. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Aug;40(4):806-822. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0716-7. Epub 2018 Aug 23. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018. PMID: 30136054
-
Ancker JS, Benda NC, Sharma MM, Johnson SB, Weiner S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Ancker JS, et al. Risk Anal. 2022 Dec;42(12):2656-2670. doi: 10.1111/risa.13875. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Risk Anal. 2022. PMID: 35007354 Free PMC article.
-
Janz NK, Li Y, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Jagsi R, Kurian AW, An LC, McLeod MC, Lee KL, Katz SJ, Hawley ST. Janz NK, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;161(3):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4076-5. Epub 2016 Dec 9. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017. PMID: 27943007 Free PMC article.
-
D'Antoni D, Smith L, Auyeung V, Weinman J. D'Antoni D, et al. Environ Health. 2017 Sep 22;16(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0307-4. Environ Health. 2017. PMID: 28938911 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Baccini M, Ghirardi L, Farinella D, Biggeri A. Baccini M, et al. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7003-y. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31186020 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical