pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Mind-body Dualism: A critique from a Health Perspective - PubMed

Mind-body Dualism: A critique from a Health Perspective

Neeta Mehta. Mens Sana Monogr. 2011 Jan.

Abstract

Philosophical theory about the nature of human beings has far reaching consequences on our understanding of various issues faced by them. Once taken as self-evident, it becomes the foundation on which knowledge gets built. The cause of concern is that this theoretical framework rarely gets questioned despite its inherent limitations and self-defeating consequences, leading to crisis in the concerned field. The field, which is facing crisis today, is that of medicine, and the paradigmatic stance that is responsible for the crisis is Cartesian dualism-a view that mind and body are essentially separate entities. This paper discusses Cartesian dualism in the context of the practice of medicine. Focusing more closely on how disease, health and treatment are defined through this position, the paper builds up its critique by throwing light on its accomplishments, limitations and self-defeating consequences. The paper also seeks to understand why this dualism is still alive despite its disavowal from philosophers, health practitioners and lay people.

Keywords: Cartesian Dualism; Cartesian Dualism and Medicine; Mind-Body Dualism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Flowchart of paper

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Descartes R. Meditations on the first philosophy. In: Hitchins R. M, editor. Great Books of the Western World. New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica; 1952.
    1. Duncan G. Mind-body dualism and the biopsychosocial model of pain: What did Descartes really say? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2000;25(4):485–513. - PubMed
    1. Hart N. The sociology of health and medicine. Lancashire:: Causeway Press; 1985.
    1. Klein H, Lyytinen K, Mumford E, Hirschheim R, Fitzgerald G, Wood-Harper A. T. Research Methods in Information Systems. North-Holland: Amsterdam; 1985. The poverty of scientism in information systems; pp. 123–151.
    1. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and Care: Clinical lessons from Anthropologic and Cross-Cultural Research. Annals of Internal Medicine. 88:251–258. - PubMed