Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9 - PubMed
. 2011;79 Suppl 10(S10):107-18.
doi: 10.1002/prot.23161. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
Affiliations
- PMID: 21928402
- PMCID: PMC3212657
- DOI: 10.1002/prot.23161
Evaluation of disorder predictions in CASP9
Bohdan Monastyrskyy et al. Proteins. 2011.
Abstract
Lack of stable three-dimensional structure, or intrinsic disorder, is a common phenomenon in proteins. Naturally, unstructured regions are proven to be essential for carrying function by many proteins, and therefore identification of such regions is an important issue. CASP has been assessing the state of the art in predicting disorder regions from amino acid sequence since 2002. Here, we present the results of the evaluation of the disorder predictions submitted to CASP9. The assessment is based on the evaluation measures and procedures used in previous CASPs. The balanced accuracy and the Matthews correlation coefficient were chosen as basic measures for evaluating the correctness of binary classifications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was the measure of choice for evaluating probability-based predictions of disorder. The CASP9 methods are shown to perform slightly better than the CASP7 methods but not better than the methods in CASP8. It was also shown that capability of most CASP9 methods to predict disorder decreases with increasing minimum disorder segment length.
Keywords: CASP; assessment of disorder prediction; intrinsically disordered proteins; rediction of disordered regions; unstructured proteins.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f58/3212657/4bccaa38e81d/nihms323389f1.gif)
Length distribution of disordered regions in CASP9 target proteins.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f58/3212657/192ad35116b3/nihms323389f2.gif)
Performance of DR groups according to three evaluation scores: AUC (black bars), Acc (grey bars) and MCC (light grey bars). The groups are sorted according to decreasing AUC score. The error bars on the plot indicate boundaries of the 95% confidence intervals for each measure.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f58/3212657/d9ca51a82f4b/nihms323389f3.gif)
ROC curves of disordered region predictions for all CASP9 groups. Legends are shown for the best 12 groups according to the AUC. There are four non-regular ROCs corresponding to poorly performing groups, two of which misinterpreted DR format (G193 used only a single value for ordered residues and G114 did not use continuous scale but rather 5 different numbers).
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f58/3212657/160b0909aabf/nihms323389f4.gif)
Comparison of prediction performance across four different minimum disorder segment length thresholds. Different panels show scores for different evaluation measures (Acc, MCC and AUC). Each group is marked with a different color; groups in the legend are sorted according to the AUC score (across and then down); the artificial average group (‘AVG’, black thicker line) is added to the graph as a point of reference.
![Figure 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f58/3212657/1f054993a36e/nihms323389f5.gif)
Comparison of the performance of the best 12 groups in the latest 3 CASPs. Groups in each CASP are sorted according to the MCC score. CASP8 results are evaluated for both the full set of targets and the set without target T0500, a long, completely unfolded protein considerably influencing the scores. The reduced target set is marked with an asterisk in the legend. The scores in CASP9 are higher than in CASP7 but lower than in CASP8. The CASP8–CASP9 drop in scores may be attributed to the greater difficulty of targets in CASP9.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of protein disorder region predictions in CASP10.
Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Moult J, Tramontano A, Fidelis K. Monastyrskyy B, et al. Proteins. 2014 Feb;82 Suppl 2(0 2):127-37. doi: 10.1002/prot.24391. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Proteins. 2014. PMID: 23946100 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of residue-residue contact predictions in CASP9.
Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A. Monastyrskyy B, et al. Proteins. 2011;79 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):119-25. doi: 10.1002/prot.23160. Epub 2011 Sep 17. Proteins. 2011. PMID: 21928322 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of residue-residue contact prediction in CASP10.
Monastyrskyy B, D'Andrea D, Fidelis K, Tramontano A, Kryshtafovych A. Monastyrskyy B, et al. Proteins. 2014 Feb;82 Suppl 2(0 2):138-53. doi: 10.1002/prot.24340. Epub 2013 Aug 31. Proteins. 2014. PMID: 23760879 Free PMC article.
-
A comprehensive overview of computational protein disorder prediction methods.
Deng X, Eickholt J, Cheng J. Deng X, et al. Mol Biosyst. 2012 Jan;8(1):114-21. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05207a. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Mol Biosyst. 2012. PMID: 21874190 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bioinformatical approaches to characterize intrinsically disordered/unstructured proteins.
Dosztányi Z, Mészáros B, Simon I. Dosztányi Z, et al. Brief Bioinform. 2010 Mar;11(2):225-43. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbp061. Epub 2009 Dec 10. Brief Bioinform. 2010. PMID: 20007729 Review.
Cited by
-
High-throughput prediction of RNA, DNA and protein binding regions mediated by intrinsic disorder.
Peng Z, Kurgan L. Peng Z, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Oct 15;43(18):e121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv585. Epub 2015 Jun 24. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015. PMID: 26109352 Free PMC article.
-
RaptorX-Property: a web server for protein structure property prediction.
Wang S, Li W, Liu S, Xu J. Wang S, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jul 8;44(W1):W430-5. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw306. Epub 2016 Apr 25. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016. PMID: 27112573 Free PMC article.
-
DISOselect: Disorder predictor selection at the protein level.
Katuwawala A, Oldfield CJ, Kurgan L. Katuwawala A, et al. Protein Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):184-200. doi: 10.1002/pro.3756. Epub 2019 Nov 7. Protein Sci. 2020. PMID: 31642118 Free PMC article.
-
A creature with a hundred waggly tails: intrinsically disordered proteins in the ribosome.
Peng Z, Oldfield CJ, Xue B, Mizianty MJ, Dunker AK, Kurgan L, Uversky VN. Peng Z, et al. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Apr;71(8):1477-504. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1446-6. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014. PMID: 23942625 Free PMC article.
-
Lin JR, Hu J. Lin JR, et al. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 29;8(10):e76864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076864. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24204689 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wu H. Studies on denaturation of proteins. XIII. A theory of denaturation. Chin J Physiol. 1931;1:219–234. - PubMed
-
- Anfinsen CB. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science. 1973;181(96):223–230. - PubMed
-
- Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol. 1999;293(2):321–331. - PubMed
-
- Dunker AK, Obradovic Z, Romero P, Garner EC, Brown CJ. Intrinsic protein disorder in complete genomes. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform. 2000;11:161–171. - PubMed
-
- Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2002;27(10):527–533. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous