Global patterns of bacterial beta-diversity in seafloor and seawater ecosystems - PubMed
Global patterns of bacterial beta-diversity in seafloor and seawater ecosystems
Lucie Zinger et al. PLoS One. 2011.
Abstract
Background: Marine microbial communities have been essential contributors to global biomass, nutrient cycling, and biodiversity since the early history of Earth, but so far their community distribution patterns remain unknown in most marine ecosystems.
Methodology/principal findings: The synthesis of 9.6 million bacterial V6-rRNA amplicons for 509 samples that span the global ocean's surface to the deep-sea floor shows that pelagic and benthic communities greatly differ, at all taxonomic levels, and share <10% bacterial types defined at 3% sequence similarity level. Surface and deep water, coastal and open ocean, and anoxic and oxic ecosystems host distinct communities that reflect productivity, land influences and other environmental constraints such as oxygen availability. The high variability of bacterial community composition specific to vent and coastal ecosystems reflects the heterogeneity and dynamic nature of these habitats. Both pelagic and benthic bacterial community distributions correlate with surface water productivity, reflecting the coupling between both realms by particle export. Also, differences in physical mixing may play a fundamental role in the distribution patterns of marine bacteria, as benthic communities showed a higher dissimilarity with increasing distance than pelagic communities.
Conclusions/significance: This first synthesis of global bacterial distribution across different ecosystems of the World's oceans shows remarkable horizontal and vertical large-scale patterns in bacterial communities. This opens interesting perspectives for the definition of biogeographical biomes for bacteria of ocean waters and the seabed.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2906/a290618ae3befe30118e42bdde1988930320d824" alt="Figure 1"
Sample locations were plotted on a SeaWiFS satellite image of chlorophyll pigment concentration, with redder colour representing higher concentrations. The realm origin of the samples is indicated by circles (pelagic) and triangles (benthic), whereas ecosystem types are indicated by the colour orange (coastal), light blue (open ocean surface waters), dark blue (deep-sea), red (anoxic), and purple (hydrothermal vents). Further visualization of sample distribution e.g. on a bathymetric map is available at
http://vamps.mbl.edu/mapper/index.php.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13143/13143efe33ca4bfca0adb7e79db4396f11fbe7f0" alt="Figure 2"
(a) Average sequence frequency for the ten most abundant bacterial classes in the pelagic and benthic realms. Error bars represent standard deviation values (number of samples indicated in Table 1). Vents and anoxic ecosystems were not taken into account for the average bacterial community composition in pelagic and benthic realms. (b) Average proportions of the main bacterial taxa per realm and ecosystem type. P = Pelagic, B = Benthic. Notice that taxonomic levels displayed here are not necessarily of the same level, but reflect the most common levels whose ecology and diversity are usually investigated in marine microbiology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/482b1/482b10a90671e2a2374d64f102525aefc43e518d" alt="Figure 3"
(a) NMDS ordination of the dissimilarity in bacterial community composition (OTU0.03 level, NMDS stress = 0.18). (b) Heat map showing pairwise community overlap (upper-half symmetric matrix displayed) according to realm/ecosystem. All ANOSIM R values were significant (1000 Monte Carlo permutations, Bonferroni-corrected P<0.05). (c) Heat map of the average number of OTU shared between ecosystems types, based on random resampling of 100 subdatasets. (d) Boxplots of the variation in beta-diversity in each ecosystem type. Different letters on each box represent significant differences in variance homogeneity between ecosystem types as determined by Mann–Whitney rank sum tests followed by Bonferroni correction (P<0.01).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c63a9/c63a92a0066a3075b487796850606af4f1dcb1ce" alt="Figure 4"
The respective contributions of ecosystem type, geographic location (transformed latitudes and longitudes, water depth), time (number of days since the first sampling) and upper water productivity (as defined by Longhurst's primary production index and classes of capture fisheries yield) were assessed by using variation partitioning and are displayed as a Venn diagram. The blue boxes (i.e. upper water productivity) correspond to the fourth category of the model, which cannot be represented by a circle in such a display. The significance of each pure effect was validated by performing partial RDA with 1000 Monte Carlo permutation tests. Significance levels: *** P<0.001, **P<0.01, *P<0.05. Covariation parts cannot be tested for significance because they are numerically deduced from the pure parts .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa12b/aa12b76e08da130f8ace9e16dfecf18e428424c2" alt="Figure 5"
(a) NMDS ordination of the dissimilarity in bacterial community composition at the Phylum level (NMDS stress = 0.15). The goodness-of-fit between this ordination and the ordination presented in Fig. 3a is shown in Table S4. Pelagic and benthic origins are indicated by the letters P and B, respectively. (b) Partitioning of the variation of bacterial composition at different taxonomic levels using the same approach as presented in Fig. 4. Units are expressed in adjusted R2 values, i.e. in proportion of explained variance.
Similar articles
-
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.
Gil M, Ramil F, AgÍs JA. Gil M, et al. Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2. Zootaxa. 2020. PMID: 33311142
-
Vuillemin A, Coskun ÖK, Orsi WD. Vuillemin A, et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 May 10;88(9):e0021622. doi: 10.1128/aem.00216-22. Epub 2022 Apr 11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35404072 Free PMC article.
-
Global diversity and biogeography of deep-sea pelagic prokaryotes.
Salazar G, Cornejo-Castillo FM, Benítez-Barrios V, Fraile-Nuez E, Álvarez-Salgado XA, Duarte CM, Gasol JM, Acinas SG. Salazar G, et al. ISME J. 2016 Mar;10(3):596-608. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.137. Epub 2015 Aug 7. ISME J. 2016. PMID: 26251871 Free PMC article.
-
Tarasov VG. Tarasov VG. Adv Mar Biol. 2006;50:267-421. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2881(05)50004-X. Adv Mar Biol. 2006. PMID: 16782453 Review.
-
Nichols CA, Guezennec J, Bowman JP. Nichols CA, et al. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2005 Jul-Aug;7(4):253-71. doi: 10.1007/s10126-004-5118-2. Epub 2005 Jul 21. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2005. PMID: 16075348 Review.
Cited by
-
Raggi L, García-Guevara F, Godoy-Lozano EE, Martínez-Santana A, Escobar-Zepeda A, Gutierrez-Rios RM, Loza A, Merino E, Sanchez-Flores A, Licea-Navarro A, Pardo-Lopez L, Segovia L, Juarez K. Raggi L, et al. Front Microbiol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1825. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01825. eCollection 2020. Front Microbiol. 2020. PMID: 32903729 Free PMC article.
-
Diversity, structure and convergent evolution of the global sponge microbiome.
Thomas T, Moitinho-Silva L, Lurgi M, Björk JR, Easson C, Astudillo-García C, Olson JB, Erwin PM, López-Legentil S, Luter H, Chaves-Fonnegra A, Costa R, Schupp PJ, Steindler L, Erpenbeck D, Gilbert J, Knight R, Ackermann G, Victor Lopez J, Taylor MW, Thacker RW, Montoya JM, Hentschel U, Webster NS. Thomas T, et al. Nat Commun. 2016 Jun 16;7:11870. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11870. Nat Commun. 2016. PMID: 27306690 Free PMC article.
-
Scicchitano D, Lo Martire M, Palladino G, Nanetti E, Fabbrini M, Dell'Anno A, Rampelli S, Corinaldesi C, Candela M. Scicchitano D, et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 5;12(1):16670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21182-8. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36198901 Free PMC article.
-
Chen P, Zhang L, Guo X, Dai X, Liu L, Xi L, Wang J, Song L, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Huang L, Huang Y. Chen P, et al. Front Microbiol. 2016 Aug 29;7:1340. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01340. eCollection 2016. Front Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 27621725 Free PMC article.
-
Biogeography of Southern Ocean prokaryotes: a comparison of the Indian and Pacific sectors.
Sow SLS, Brown MV, Clarke LJ, Bissett A, van de Kamp J, Trull TW, Raes EJ, Seymour JR, Bramucci AR, Ostrowski M, Boyd PW, Deagle BE, Pardo PC, Sloyan BM, Bodrossy L. Sow SLS, et al. Environ Microbiol. 2022 May;24(5):2449-2466. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15906. Epub 2022 Feb 16. Environ Microbiol. 2022. PMID: 35049099 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Giovannoni SJ, Stingl U. Molecular diversity and ecology of microbial plankton. Nature. 2005;309:343–348. - PubMed
-
- Azam F, Malfatti F. Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:782–791. - PubMed
-
- Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF. The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science. 2008;320:1034–1039. - PubMed