Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections - PubMed

Evaluation of bike boxes at signalized intersections

Jennifer Dill et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

This paper presents a before-after study of bike boxes at 10 signalized intersections in Portland, Oregon. The bike boxes, also known as advanced stop lines or advanced stop boxes, were installed to increase visibility of cyclists and reduce conflicts between motor vehicles and cyclists, particularly in potential "right-hook" situations. Before and after video were analyzed for seven intersections with green bike boxes, three intersections with uncolored bike boxes, and two control intersections. User perceptions were measured through surveys of cyclists passing through five of the bike box intersections and of motorists working downtown, where the boxes were concentrated. Both the observations and survey of motorists found a high rate of compliance and understanding of the markings. Overall, 73% of the stopping motor vehicles did not encroach at all into the bike box. Both motor vehicle and bicycle encroachment in the pedestrian crosswalk fell significantly at the bike box locations compared to the control intersections. The bike boxes had mixed effects on the motorists' encroachment in the bicycle lane. The number of observed conflicts at the bike box locations decreased, while the total number of cyclists and motor vehicles turning right increased. Negative-binomial models based upon the data predict fewer conflicts with the boxes, particularly as right-turning motor vehicle volumes increase. Observations of yielding behavior at two bike box and one control intersection found an improvement in motorists yielding to cyclists at the bike box locations. Differences in the traffic volumes and location contexts make firm conclusions about the effects of green coloring of the boxes difficult. Higher shares of surveyed motorists felt that the bike boxes made driving safer rather than more dangerous, even when the sample was narrowed to respondents who were not also cyclists. Over three-quarters of the surveyed cyclists thought that the boxes made the intersection safer.

Similar articles

• Cyclist activity and injury risk analysis at signalized intersections: a Bayesian modelling approach.

  Strauss J, Miranda-Moreno LF, Morency P. Strauss J, et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.037. Epub 2013 May 14. Accid Anal Prev. 2013. PMID: 23743297

• Cyclists in roundabouts--different design solutions.

  Sakshaug L, Laureshyn A, Svensson A, Hydén C. Sakshaug L, et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):1338-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.02.015. Epub 2010 Mar 30. Accid Anal Prev. 2010. PMID: 20441851

• The role of protected intersections in improving bicycle safety and driver right-turning behavior.

  Deliali K, Christofa E, Knodler M Jr. Deliali K, et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106295. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106295. Epub 2021 Jul 15. Accid Anal Prev. 2021. PMID: 34273623

• Are signalized intersections with cycle tracks safer? A case-control study based on automated surrogate safety analysis using video data.

  Zangenehpour S, Strauss J, Miranda-Moreno LF, Saunier N. Zangenehpour S, et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jan;86:161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Nov 10. Accid Anal Prev. 2016. PMID: 26562673 Review.

• Traffic-related injury prevention interventions for low-income countries.

  Forjuoh SN. Forjuoh SN. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003 Mar-Jun;10(1-2):109-18. doi: 10.1076/icsp.10.1.109.14115. Inj Control Saf Promot. 2003. PMID: 12772494 Review.

Cited by

• Impacts of Bicycle Infrastructure in Mid-Sized Cities (IBIMS): protocol for a natural experiment study in three Canadian cities.

  Winters M, Branion-Calles M, Therrien S, Fuller D, Gauvin L, Whitehurst DGT, Nelson T. Winters M, et al. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 21;8(1):e019130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019130. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 29358440 Free PMC article.

• Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists.

  Mulvaney CA, Smith S, Watson MC, Parkin J, Coupland C, Miller P, Kendrick D, McClintock H. Mulvaney CA, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD010415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26661390 Free PMC article. Review.

• Building CapaCITY/É for sustainable transportation: protocol for an implementation science research program in healthy cities.

  Winters M, Fuller D, Cloutier MS, Harris MA, Howard A, Kestens Y, Kirk S, Macpherson A, Moore S, Rothman L, Shareck M, Tomasone JR, Laberee K, Stephens ZP, Sones M, Ayton D, Batomen B, Bell S, Collins P, Diab E, Giles AR, Hagel BE, Harris MS, Harris P, Lachapelle U, Manaugh K, Mitra R, Muhajarine N, Myrdahl TM, Pettit CJ, Pike I, Skouteris H, Wachsmuth D, Whitehurst D, Beck B. Winters M, et al. BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e085850. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085850. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38631827 Free PMC article.

• Is Red the New Black? A Quasi-Experimental Study Comparing Perceptions of Differently Coloured Cycle Lanes.

  Karlsen K, Fyhri A. Karlsen K, et al. Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 4;11:554488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554488. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 33343440 Free PMC article.

• Assessing bicycle safety risks using emerging mobile sensing data.

  Li Y, Zhang Y, Long Y, Bhalla K, Ezzati M. Li Y, et al. Travel Behav Soc. 2025 Jan;38:100906. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100906. Travel Behav Soc. 2025. PMID: 39411520 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms