A brief historicity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2012
A brief historicity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
Shadia Kawa et al. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2012.
Abstract
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of the American Psychiatric Association, currently in its fourth edition and considered the reference for the characterization and diagnosis of mental disorders, has undergone various developments since its inception in the mid-twentieth century. With the fifth edition of the DSM presently in field trials for release in 2013, there is renewed discussion and debate over the extent of its relative successes - and shortcomings - at iteratively incorporating scientific evidence on the often ambiguous nature and etiology of mental illness. Given the power that the DSM has exerted both within psychiatry and society at large, this essay seeks to analyze variations in content and context of various editions of the DSM, address contributory influences and repercussion of such variations on the evolving landscape of psychiatry as discipline and practice over the past sixty years. Specifically, we document major modifications in the definition, characterization, and classification of mental disorders throughout successive editions of the DSM, in light of shifting trends in the conceptualization of psychopathology within evolving schools of thought in psychiatry, and in the context of progress in behavioral and psychopharmacological therapeutics over time. We touch upon the social, political, and financial environments in which these changes took places, address the significance of these changes with respect to the legitimacy (and legitimization) of what constitutes mental illness and health, and examine the impact and implications of these changes on psychiatric practice, research, and teaching. We argue that problematic issues in psychiatry, arguably reflecting the large-scale adoption of the DSM, may be linked to difficulties in formulating a standardized nosology of psychopathology. In this light, we highlight 1) issues relating to attempts to align the DSM with the medical model, with regard to increasing specificity in the characterization of discrete mental disease entities and the incorporation of neurogenetic, neurochemical and neuroimaging data in its nosological framework; 2) controversies surrounding the medicalization of cognition, emotion, and behavior, and the interpretation of subjective variables as 'normal' or 'abnormal' in the context of society and culture; and 3) what constitutes treatment, enablement, or enhancement - and what metrics, guidelines, and policies may need to be established to clarify such criteria.
Similar articles
-
Cerbo AD. Cerbo AD. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021. PMID: 34964106 English, Turkish.
-
Fischer BA. Fischer BA. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012 Dec;200(12):1022-30. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318275cf19. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012. PMID: 23197117 Review.
-
The Troubled History of Psychiatry's Quest for Specificity.
Horwitz AV, Grob GN. Horwitz AV, et al. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016 Aug;41(4):521-39. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3620797. Epub 2016 Apr 28. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016. PMID: 27127255
-
Psychiatry and the 21st Century: Reworking the DSM.
Becker RE. Becker RE. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021 Jun 1;209(6):398-402. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001342. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2021. PMID: 34037549
-
Can psychopathology and neuroscience coexist in psychiatric classifications?
Crocq MA. Crocq MA. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;20(3):155-160. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.3/macrocq. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30581284 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning.
Mulinari S. Mulinari S. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2014 Oct 18;9:14. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-9-14. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2014. PMID: 25326797 Free PMC article.
-
Bragazzi NL. Bragazzi NL. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013 Jul 12;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-8-4. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2013. PMID: 23849623 Free PMC article.
-
London EB. London EB. Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 19;9:1120. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01120. eCollection 2018. Front Neurol. 2018. PMID: 30619071 Free PMC article.
-
Minding our Minds: Obsessive-Compulsiveness, Psychiatry, and Psychology.
Blum LD. Blum LD. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;47(2):543-554. doi: 10.1007/s11013-022-09767-4. Epub 2022 Jan 22. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 35066727 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Psychedelic treatment of functional neurological disorder: a systematic review.
Butler M, Seynaeve M, Nicholson TR, Pick S, Kanaan RA, Lees A, Young AH, Rucker J. Butler M, et al. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 May 11;10:2045125320912125. doi: 10.1177/2045125320912125. eCollection 2020. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32435447 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Frequently Asked Questions, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 2011. http://www.psych.org/MainMenu/Research/DSMIV/FAQs.aspx
-
- Grob GN. Origins of DSM-I: of setting appearance and reality. Am J Psychiatry. 1991;148:421–31. - PubMed
-
- Klerman GL. In: Contemporary Directions and Psychopathology: Towards the DSM-IV. Millon T, Klerman GL, editor. New York: The Guilford Press; 1986. Historical perspectives on contemporary schools of psychopathology.
-
- Raines GN. Comment: the new nomenclature. Am J Psychiatry. 1953;109:548–549. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous