Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research - PubMed
- ️Invalid Date
. 2008 Oct;2(10):1501-17.
doi: 10.1017/S1751731108002723.
Affiliations
- PMID: 22443909
- DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108002723
Free article
Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: current status and possible future research
E M C Terlouw et al. Animal. 2008 Oct.
Free article
Abstract
The present paper describes the main procedures used to slaughter fowl, pigs, calves and adult cattle, sheep, and farmed fish, starting on the farm and ending with the death of the animal at the abattoir. It reviews the currently known causes of stress, indicated by behavioural and physiological measurements on the animal level, and by post-mortem muscle metabolism. During the pre-slaughter period, psychological stress is due to changes of environment, social disturbances and handling, and physical stress is due to food deprivation, climatic conditions, fatigue, and sometimes pain. The exact causes of stress depend, however, on the characteristics of each species, including the rearing system. For fowl, bird catching and crating, duration and climatic conditions of transport and of lairage and shackling are the main known pre-slaughter stress factors. For pigs, stress is caused by fighting during mixing of pens, loading and unloading conditions, and introduction in the restrainer. Handling and novelty of the situation contribute to the stress reactions. For veal calves and adult cattle, disruption of the social group, handling, loading and sometimes unloading conditions, fatigue, novelty of the situation and for calves mixing with unfamiliar animals are known stress factors. Gathering and yarding of extensively reared lambs and sheep causes stress, particularly when shepherd dogs are used. Subsequent transport may induce fatigue, especially if sheep are commercialised through auctions or markets. In farmed fish, stress is predominantly related to environmental aspects such as temperature, oxygen, cleanliness of the water and, to a certain extent, stocking density and removal of the fish from the water. If transport and lairage conditions are good and their durations not too long, they may allow pigs, calves and adult cattle, sheep, and fish to rest. For certain species, it was shown that genetic origin and earlier experience influence reactions to the slaughter procedure. Stunning techniques used depend on the species. Pigs and fowl are mostly electrically or gas-stunned, while most adult cattle are stunned with a captive bolt pistol. Calves and sheep may be electrically stunned or with a captive bolt pistol. Various stunning methods exist for the different farmed fish species. Potential causes of stress associated with the different stunning procedures are discussed. The paper addresses further consequences for meat quality and possible itineraries for future research. For all species, and most urgently for fish, more knowledge is needed on stunning and killing techniques, including gas-stunning techniques, to protect welfare.
Similar articles
-
Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter.
Gregory NG. Gregory NG. Meat Sci. 2008 Sep;80(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019. Epub 2008 May 24. Meat Sci. 2008. PMID: 22063164
-
Validation of indicators used to assess unconsciousness in veal calves at slaughter.
Verhoeven MT, Gerritzen MA, Hellebrekers LJ, Kemp B. Verhoeven MT, et al. Animal. 2016 Sep;10(9):1457-65. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000422. Epub 2016 Mar 11. Animal. 2016. PMID: 26965337
-
Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Faucitano L, Dadgar S, Shand P, González LA, Crowe TG. Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, et al. Meat Sci. 2012 Nov;92(3):227-43. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Meat Sci. 2012. PMID: 22608833 Review.
-
Broom DM. Broom DM. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003 Mar;110(3):83-9. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003. PMID: 12731104 Review.
Cited by
-
Davis MK, Sullivan PA, Hess AM, Nair MN, Mooney DF, Edwards-Callaway LN. Davis MK, et al. Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;8:txad150. doi: 10.1093/tas/txad150. eCollection 2024. Transl Anim Sci. 2024. PMID: 38259258 Free PMC article.
-
Muráni E, Ponsuksili S, D'Eath RB, Turner SP, Kurt E, Evans G, Thölking L, Klont R, Foury A, Mormède P, Wimmers K. Muráni E, et al. BMC Genet. 2010 Aug 9;11:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-74. BMC Genet. 2010. PMID: 20696048 Free PMC article.
-
Transcriptome profiling reveals stress-responsive gene networks in cattle muscles.
Cassar-Malek I, Pomiès L, de la Foye A, Tournayre J, Boby C, Hocquette JF. Cassar-Malek I, et al. PeerJ. 2022 Apr 6;10:e13150. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13150. eCollection 2022. PeerJ. 2022. PMID: 35411255 Free PMC article.
-
Wigham E, Grist A, Mullan S, Wotton S, Butterworth A. Wigham E, et al. Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 20;9(8):584. doi: 10.3390/ani9080584. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31434301 Free PMC article.
-
da Silva WC, da Silva JAR, Martorano LG, da Silva ÉBR, de Carvalho KC, Sousa CEL, Neves KAL, Júnior RNCC, Belo TS, de Santos AGS, Araújo CV, Joaquim LA, Rodrigues TCGC, Lourenço-Júnior JB. da Silva WC, et al. Vet Sci. 2024 May 23;11(6):236. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11060236. Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38921983 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources