Interventions for ingrowing toenails - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2012
Review
Interventions for ingrowing toenails
Just A H Eekhof et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.
Abstract
Background: Ingrowing toenails are a common problem in which part of the nail penetrates the skinfold alongside the nail, creating a painful area. Different non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails are available, but there is no consensus about a standard first-choice treatment.
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of non-surgical and surgical interventions in a medical setting for ingrowing toenails, with the aim of relieving symptoms and preventing regrowth of the nail edge or recurrence of the ingrowing toenail.
Search methods: We updated our searches of the following databases to January 2010: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We also updated our searches of CINAHL, WEB of SCIENCE, ongoing trials databases, and reference lists of articles.
Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials of non-surgical and surgical interventions for ingrowing toenails, which are also known by the terms 'unguis incarnatus' and 'onychocryptosis', and those comparing postoperative treatment options. Studies must have had a follow-up period of at least one month.
Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently selected studies, assessed methodological quality, and extracted data from selected studies. We analysed outcomes as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Main results: This is an update of the Cochrane review 'Surgical treatments for ingrowing toenails'. In this update we included 24 studies, with a total of 2826 participants (of which 7 were also included in the previous review). Five studies were on non-surgical interventions, and 19 were on surgical interventions.The risk of bias of each included study was assessed; this is a measure of the methodological quality of several characteristics in these studies. It was found to be unclear for several items, due to incomplete reporting. Participants were not blinded to the treatment they received because of the nature of the interventions, e.g. surgery or wearing a brace on the toe. Outcome assessors were reported to be blinded in only 9 of the 24 studies.None of the included studies addressed our primary outcomes of 'relief of symptoms' or 'regrowth', but 16 did address 'recurrence'. Not all of the included studies addressed all of our secondary outcomes (healing time, postoperative complications - infection and haemorrhage, pain of operation/postoperative pain, participant satisfaction), and two studies did not address any of the secondary outcomes.Surgical interventions were better at preventing recurrence than non-surgical interventions with gutter treatment (or gutter removal), and they were probably better than non-surgical treatments with orthonyxia (brace treatment).In 4 of the 12 studies in which a surgical intervention with chemical ablation (e.g. phenol) was compared with a surgical intervention without chemical ablation, a significant reduction of recurrence was found. The surgical interventions on both sides in these comparisons were not equal, so it is not clear if the reduction was caused by the addition of the chemical ablation.In only one study, a comparison was made of a surgical intervention known as partial nail avulsion with matrix excision compared to the same surgical intervention with phenol. In this study of 117 participants, the surgical intervention with phenol was significantly more effective in preventing recurrence than the surgical intervention alone (14% compared to 41% respectively, RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.69).None of the postoperative interventions described, such as the use of antibiotics or manuka honey; povidone-iodine with paraffin; hydrogel with paraffin; or paraffin gauze, showed any significant difference when looking at infection rates, pain, or healing time.
Authors' conclusions: Surgical interventions are more effective than non-surgical interventions in preventing the recurrence of an ingrowing toenail.In the studies comparing a surgical intervention to a surgical intervention with the application of phenol, the addition of phenol is probably more effective in preventing recurrence and regrowth of the ingrowing toenail. Because there is only one study in which the surgical interventions in both study arms were equal, more studies have to be done to confirm these outcomes.Postoperative interventions do not decrease the risk of postoperative infection, postoperative pain, or healing time.
Conflict of interest statement
None known.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1692b/1692b4fec78d162a12d8638be985e82915520517" alt="1"
Proper Trimming of the Toenail
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0b10/b0b10d25ef701fb70ed226cde4534fdfaf729309" alt="2"
The Three Stages of Ingrown Toenails
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/239a1/239a130d40fda8a334bbcee159d5b895054ba7d7" alt="3"
Three Non‐surgical Interventions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97202/9720206883974b9dec80ae83a4bb8a91c43d7e40" alt="4"
Surgical Interventions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00354/00354ffb917fc45220a4d1747175fbd47b0801fa" alt="5"
'Risk of bias' table: Review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58a45/58a4547870a3f521958a74c063fff6620334c919" alt="6"
Methodological quality graph: Review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/443d8/443d85505b06aadf0800c5501fbd5b3f77e9e9df" alt="1.1"
Comparison 1 Non‐surgical procedures, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84236/84236461f87f110558a185978a0b4c5e57ca2ddb" alt="2.1"
Comparison 2 Non‐surgical vs surgical procedures, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6319/d6319268cdc08feccc0aff1071cfea92984456e9" alt="3.1"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c10/a1c104def6665fbf232ec3180e8b8b79bbd33077" alt="3.2"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 2 Pain of operation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8ef7/f8ef7cb07f8b01f1bd9c0ed42f93e04c3c842dbc" alt="3.3"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 3 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd310/cd310e590d024dd65e6b778f30c00e39b0bd41de" alt="3.4"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 4 Postoperative haemorrhage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd331/fd331955d0b669b4c9f3718df2bc6f45f2586587" alt="3.5"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 5 Postoperative analgesic use.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f2eb/9f2eb385e220f2da69d03081369fa2d4a2c382f9" alt="3.6"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 6 Postoperative pain at 2 weeks (VAS).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b00c/7b00cb883d850962c98c271af0b46c634aab64dd" alt="3.7"
Comparison 3 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & surg vs surg proc, Outcome 7 Participant satisfaction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e95fa/e95faae2270055e7040e89370666efc84275ebbc" alt="4.1"
Comparison 4 Surgical procedures: Different types of surg proc, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fac/27fac86e794daa5c67332ed7a3ba929ccdda6209" alt="4.2"
Comparison 4 Surgical procedures: Different types of surg proc, Outcome 2 Participant satisfaction.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6556c/6556c4527bef057d0fde81fd7c53c0bf2e0da5b2" alt="4.3"
Comparison 4 Surgical procedures: Different types of surg proc, Outcome 3 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c03f1/c03f10aff0761d9bb9f00af809fadea039882f50" alt="5.1"
Comparison 5 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & partial avul vs chem abln & surg, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23cab/23cab98acbea98e6dc43471ad04510fd2f01a607" alt="5.2"
Comparison 5 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & partial avul vs chem abln & surg, Outcome 2 Postoperative pain (yes/no).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5821b/5821bf0a47c77f03cbe40c319a7e5a6cc2431774" alt="5.3"
Comparison 5 Surgical procedures: Chem abln & partial avul vs chem abln & surg, Outcome 3 Postoperative pain intensity after 24h duration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bf71/9bf71400df94691e7f8bb819263f754fa40daa09" alt="6.1"
Comparison 6 Surgical procedures: Wedge + electroful vs wedge + surg ME, Outcome 1 Postoperative pain at 2 weeks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3150d/3150d60dd4d6873af9b4863a39cec8fb18b72235" alt="6.2"
Comparison 6 Surgical procedures: Wedge + electroful vs wedge + surg ME, Outcome 2 Postoperative haemorrhage at 2 weeks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6045e/6045e860a3514f9055d24362b278c7b0114e2959" alt="7.1"
Comparison 7 Postoperative procedures, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0278/b02786c144548248abf017a3279a8ad27a8c37eb" alt="7.2"
Comparison 7 Postoperative procedures, Outcome 2 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfe42/cfe423b5e555dc981a1b4cbf0caa0eb9be30804d" alt="7.3"
Comparison 7 Postoperative procedures, Outcome 3 Postoperative pain (VAS).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79ee4/79ee4dde1c47bb27cc59c88c963ce30d23e09b7b" alt="7.4"
Comparison 7 Postoperative procedures, Outcome 4 Healing time (days).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e675/3e6757d1cd26c5fbc8bdea344dc1d3a0336cb31a" alt="8.1"
Comparison 8 Surgery plus postoperative treatment vs surgery, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fda04/fda0469747ef74d963cad0652fda4256e34b28bc" alt="8.2"
Comparison 8 Surgery plus postoperative treatment vs surgery, Outcome 2 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43c8d/43c8d301045fe56fe4c83677f2c9f93ac4d775d4" alt="9.1"
Comparison 9 Surgery plus postoperative treatment vs phenol, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd2c2/dd2c2897191fe56cdd902a52ec0bb166859dcc7c" alt="9.2"
Comparison 9 Surgery plus postoperative treatment vs phenol, Outcome 2 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8000e/8000e5d8ab441dcb06f696938480851bfc038313" alt="10.1"
Comparison 10 Phenol plus postoperative treatment vs phenol, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7402/f7402056a1c3caf862797baa329c58ba8306bb05" alt="10.2"
Comparison 10 Phenol plus postoperative treatment vs phenol, Outcome 2 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd4dc/fd4dc251b1a81371e135a9e536ec51ce6ebc3628" alt="10.3"
Comparison 10 Phenol plus postoperative treatment vs phenol, Outcome 3 Healing time (weeks).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eee04/eee04aad1bf504957a062f356f1a8a1162c690e7" alt="11.1"
Comparison 11 Phenol plus postoperative treatment vs surgery, Outcome 1 Recurrence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/340b2/340b2607755ba3e1cc71d68020ab55e55df53ab0" alt="11.2"
Comparison 11 Phenol plus postoperative treatment vs surgery, Outcome 2 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd43d/cd43d52bae797cb1ce67c62a88fb9eb3fe15c8e9" alt="12.1"
Comparison 12 Preoperative treatment vs postoperative treatment, Outcome 1 Healing time (weeks).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4391b/4391baeb2afb782440f5898d18d81c1b89de5685" alt="13.1"
Comparison 13 Preoperative treatment vs surgery, Outcome 1 Postoperative infection.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9ee1/e9ee1ed89d94ce53c0b39e835a7191afa72207af" alt="13.2"
Comparison 13 Preoperative treatment vs surgery, Outcome 2 Healing time (weeks).
Update of
-
Surgical treatments for ingrowing toenails.
Rounding C, Bloomfield S. Rounding C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001541.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005. PMID: 15846620 Updated. Review.
Similar articles
-
Elwenspoek MM, Thom H, Sheppard AL, Keeney E, O'Donnell R, Jackson J, Roadevin C, Dawson S, Lane D, Stubbs J, Everitt H, Watson JC, Hay AD, Gillett P, Robins G, Jones HE, Mallett S, Whiting PF. Elwenspoek MM, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371. Health Technol Assess. 2022. PMID: 36321689 Free PMC article.
-
Todd CL, Johnson EE, Stewart F, Wallace SA, Bryant A, Woodward S, Norton C. Todd CL, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 29;10(10):CD002115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002115.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39470206
-
Pillay J, Gaudet LA, Saba S, Vandermeer B, Ashiq AR, Wingert A, Hartling L. Pillay J, et al. Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39593159 Free PMC article.
-
Mackintosh NJ, Davis RE, Easter A, Rayment-Jones H, Sevdalis N, Wilson S, Adams M, Sandall J. Mackintosh NJ, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;12(12):CD012829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012829.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33285618 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.
Lindson-Hawley N, Hartmann-Boyce J, Fanshawe TR, Begh R, Farley A, Lancaster T. Lindson-Hawley N, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27734465 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Recurrence and satisfaction with sutured surgical treatment of an ingrown toenail.
Dąbrowski M, Litowińska A. Dąbrowski M, et al. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Jun 26;56:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.06.029. eCollection 2020 Aug. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020. PMID: 32637092 Free PMC article.
-
Muriel-Sánchez JM, Coheña-Jiménez M, Montaño-Jiménez P. Muriel-Sánchez JM, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 6;18(19):10478. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910478. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639778 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Deviation of the Nail Lamina after Unilateral Partial Matricectomy.
Saura-Sempere Á, Sánchez-Gómez R, Reguera-Medina JM, Márquez-Reina S, Rodríguez-León R, Gómez-Carrión Á. Saura-Sempere Á, et al. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;12(16):1681. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161681. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39201239 Free PMC article.
-
Muriel-Sánchez JM, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Montaño-Jiménez P, Coheña-Jiménez M. Muriel-Sánchez JM, et al. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 20;9(3):845. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030845. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32244966 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for infection following ingrowing toenail surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Terrill AJ, Green KJ, Salerno A, Butterworth PA. Terrill AJ, et al. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Jul 29;13(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00414-y. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020. PMID: 32727511 Free PMC article.
References
References to studies included in this review
Anderson 1990 {published data only}
-
- Anderson JH, Greig JD, Ireland AJ, Anderson JR. Randomized, prospective study of nail bed ablation for recurrent ingrowing toenails. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1990;35:240‐2. - PubMed
Arista 2006 {published data only}
-
- Arista GF, Merino JE. Onychocryptosis: study comparing postoperative period after partial lateral matricectomy vs partial lateral matricectomy with phenolization [Onicocriptosis: estudio comparativo del periodo posoperatorio de una matricectomía parcial lateral con el de una matricectomía parcial lateral con fenolizacíon]. Dermatología Revista Mexicana 2006;50(3):87‐93.
Beck 1984 {published data only}
-
- Beck J, Nielsen J. Orthonyxia compared with conservative treatment in ingrowing toenail of the great toe [Ortonyksi kontra konservativ behandling ved unguis incarnatus hallucis]. Ugeskrift for Laeger 1984;146(46):3537‐8. - PubMed
Bos 2006 {published data only}
-
- Bos AMC, Tilburg MWA, Sorge AA, Klinkenbijl JHG. Randomized clinical trial of surgical technique and local antibiotics for ingrowing toenail. British Journal of Surgery 2006;94:292‐6. - PubMed
Dovison 2001 {published data only}
-
- Dovison R, Keenan AM. Wound healing and infection in nail matrix phenolisation wounds. Does topical medication make a difference?. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2001;91(5):230‐3. - PubMed
Flores 2006 {published data only}
-
- Flores AV, Merino JE. Partial matricectomy vs partial matricectomy with electrofulguration as a treatment for onychocryptosis [Matricectomía parcial quirúrgica vs matricectomía parcial con electrofulguración en el tratamiento de la onicocriptosis]. Dermatología Revista Mexicana 2006;50(2):54‐9.
Gem 1990a {published data only}
-
- Gem MA, Sykes PA. Ingrowing toenails: studies of segmental chemical ablation (study 1). British Journal of Clinical Practice 1990;44:562‐3. - PubMed
Gem 1990b {published data only}
-
- Gem MA, Sykes PA. Ingrowing toenails: studies of segmental chemical ablation (study 2). British Journal of Clinical Practice 1990;44:562‐3. - PubMed
Gerritsma‐Bleeker 2002 {published data only}
-
- Gerritsma‐Bleeker CLE, Klaase JM, Geelkerken LH, Hermans J, Det RJ. Partial matrix excision or segmental phenolization for ingrowing toenails. Archives of Surgery 2002;137:320‐5. - PubMed
Greig 1991a {published data only}
-
- Grieg JD, Anderson JH, Ireland AJ, Anderson JR. The surgical treatment of ingrowing toenails (Study 1). Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1991;73:131‐3. - PubMed
Issa 1988 {published data only}
-
- Issa MM, Tanner WA. Approach to ingrowing toenails: the wedge resection/segmental phenolization combination treatment. British Journal of Surgery 1988;75:181‐3. - PubMed
Kim 2003 {published data only}
-
- Kim YJ, Ko JH, Choi KC, Lee CG, Lim KJ. Nail‐splinting technique for ingrown toenails: The therapeutic effects and the proper removal time of the splint. Dermatologic Surgery 2003;29:745‐8. - PubMed
Kruijff 2008 {published data only}
-
- Kruijff S, Det RJ, Meer GT, Berg ICMAE, Palen J, Geelkerken RH. Partial matrix excision or orthonyxia for ingrowing toenails. Journal of American College of Surgeons 2008;206:148‐153. - PubMed
Leahy 1990 {published data only}
-
- Leahy AL, Timon CI, Craig A, Stephens RB. Ingrowing toenails: improving treatment. Surgery 1990;107:566‐7. - PubMed
McIntosh 2006 {published data only}
-
- McIntosh CD, Thomson CE. Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras dressing following toenail surgery. Journal of Wound Care 2006;15(3):133‐6. - PubMed
Morkane 1984 {published data only}
-
- Morkane AJ, Robertson RW, Inglis GS. Segmental phenolization of ingrowing toenails: a randomized controlled study. British Journal of Surgery 1984;71:526‐7. - PubMed
Perry 1984 {published data only}
-
- Perry EP, O'Malley S, McGowan B, Cullimore G, Watkin DFL. A comparison of four nail‐conserving procedures for ingrowing toenail. British Journal of Surgery 1984;71(11):912.
Reyzelman 2000 {published data only}
-
- Reyzelman AM, Trombello KA, Vayser DJ, Armstrong DG, Harkless LB. Are antibiotics necessary in the treatment of locally infected ingrowing toenails?. Archives of Family Medicine 2000;9:930‐2. - PubMed
Shaath 2005 {published data only}
-
- Shaath N, Shea J, Whiteman I, Zarugh A. A prospective randomized comparison of the Zadik procedure and chemical ablation in the treatment of ingrown toenails. Foot & Ankle International 2005;26(5):401‐5. - PubMed
Sykes 1988b {published data only}
Sykes 1988c {published data only}
van der Ham 1990 {published data only}
-
- Ham AC, Hackeng CA, Yo TI. The treatment of ingrowing toenails. A randomised comparison of wedge excision and phenol cauterisation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 1990;72:507‐9. - PubMed
Varma 1983 {published data only}
-
- Varma JS, Kinninmonth AW, Hamer Hodges DW. Surgical wedge excision versus phenol wedge cauterisation for ingrowing toenail. A controlled study. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1983;28:331‐2. - PubMed
References to studies excluded from this review
Aksahal 2001 {published data only}
-
- Aksahal AB, Atahan C, Öztas P, Oruk Ş. Minimizing postoperative drainage with 20% ferric chloride after chemical matricectomy with phenol. Dermatologic Surgery 2001;27:158‐160. - PubMed
Andrew 1979 {published data only}
Arai 2004 {published data only}
-
- Arai H, Arai T, Nakajima H, Haneke E. Formable acrylic treatment for ingrowing nail with gutter splint and sculptured nail. International Journal of Dermatology 2004;43:759‐765. - PubMed
Boberg 2002 {published data only}
-
- Boberg JS, Frederiksen MS, Harton FM. Scientific analysis of phenol nail surgery. Journal of the Amrican Podiatric Medical Association 2002;92(10):575‐9. - PubMed
Bossers 1992 {published data only}
-
- Bossers AM, Jansen IMC, Eggink WF. Rational therapy for ingrown toenails. A prospective study. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 1992;58(3):325‐9. - PubMed
Bostanci 2007 {published data only}
-
- Bostanci S, Kocyigit P, Gürgey E. Comparison of phenol and sodium hydroxide chemical matricectomies for the treatment of ingrowing toenails. Dermatologic Surgery 2007;33:680‐5. - PubMed
Burssens 1987 {published data only}
-
- Burssens P, Vereecken L, Loon C. A randomized controlled study of two treaments for ingrowing toenails [Een vergelijkende studie tussen twee behandelingswijzen voor onychocryptosis (ingegroeide teennagel)]. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 1987;87:294‐7. - PubMed
Cameron 1981 {published data only}
Córdoba‐Fernandez 2008 {published data only}
-
- Córdoba‐Fernandez A, Rayo‐Rosado R, Juarez‐Jiménez JM. Platelet gel for the surgical treatment of onychocryptosis. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2008;98(4):296‐301. - PubMed
Foley 1994 {published data only}
-
- Foley GB, Allen J. Wound healing after toenail avulsion. A comparison of Kaltostat and Melolin as postoperative dressings. The Foot 1994;4:88‐91.
Greig 1991b {published data only}
-
- Greig JD, Anderson JH, Ireland AJ, Anderson JR. The surgical treatment of ingrowing toenails [Study 2]. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1991;73‐B:131‐3. - PubMed
Herold 2001 {published data only}
-
- Herold N, Houshian S, Riegels‐Nielsen P. A prospective comparison of wegde matrix resection with nail matrix phenolization for the treatment of ingrown toenail. The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery 2001;40(6):390‐5. - PubMed
Holt 1987 {published data only}
-
- Holt SDH, Tiwari IB, Howell GP. Phenolisation as an adjunct to Zadik's procedure for ingrowing toenail and onychogryphosis. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1987;32(4):228‐229. - PubMed
Kocyigit 2005 {published data only}
-
- Kocyigit P, Bostanci S, Özdemir E, Gürgey E. Sodium hydroxide chemical matricectomy for the treatment of ingrown toenails: Comparison of three different application periods. Dermatologic Surgery 2005;31:744‐7. - PubMed
Schütte 1980 {published data only}
-
- Schütte PR. Partial excision of matrix as a treatment of the ingrowing nail [Partiële matrixexcisie als behandeling van de ingroeiende nagel]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1980;124(44):1868‐1870. - PubMed
Sykes 1988a {published data only}
Tada 2004 {published data only}
-
- Tada H, Hatoko M, Tanaka A, Iioka H, Niitsuma K, Mashiba K. Clinical comparison of the scanning CO₂ laser and conventional surgery in the treatment of ingrown nail deformities. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 2004;15:387‐390. - PubMed
Tait 1987 {published data only}
-
- Tait GR, Tuck JS. Surgical or phenol ablation of the nail bed for ingrowing toenails: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1987;32:358‐60. - PubMed
References to studies awaiting assessment
Altinyazar 2010 {published data only}
-
- Altinyazar HC, Demirel CB, Koca R, Hosnuter M. Digital block with and without epinephrine during chemical matricectomy with phenol. Dermatologic Surgery 2010;36(10):1568‐1571. - PubMed
Peyvandi 2011 {published data only}
-
- Peyvandi H, Robati RM, Yegane RA, Hajinasrollah E, Toossi P, Peyvandi AA, et al. Comparison of two surgical methods (Winograd and sleeve method) in the treatment of ingrown toenail. Dermatologic Surgery 2011;37(3):331‐335. - PubMed
Tatlican 2009 {published data only}
-
- Tatlican S, Yamangöktürk B, Eren C, Eskioğlu F, Adiyaman S. Comparison of phenol applications of different durations for the cauterization of the germinal matrix: an efficacy and safety study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 2009;43(4):298‐302. - PubMed
Zaba 2002 {published data only}
-
- Zaba R, Zaba Z, Krol J, Karon J. Laser treatment of ingrown toenails. Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie 2002;129:525.
References to ongoing studies
ISRCTN32883274 {unpublished data only}
-
- ISRCTN32883274. Radio surgery versus 80% phenol for toe nail matrix ablation: a randomised comparison study. http://www.controlled‐trials.com/ISRCTN32883274 (accessed 11 December 2011).
NCT00641433 {unpublished data only}
-
- NCT00641433. Topical collagen‐silver versus standard care following phenol ablation of ingrown nails: a randomized controlled trial. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00641433 (accessed 11 December 2011).
Additional references
Antrum 1984
-
- Antrum RM. Radical excision of the nailfold for ingrowing toenail. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1984;66(1):63‐5. - PubMed
Cox 1995
-
- Cox HA, Jones MRO. Direct extension osteomyelitis secondary to chronic onychocryptosis. Three case reports. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 1995;85(6):321‐4. - PubMed
DeLauro 2004
-
- DeLauro NM, DeLauro TM. Onychocryptosis. Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery 2004;21(4):617‐30. - PubMed
Dunn 2004
-
- Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. American Journal of Epidemiology 2004;159(5):491‐8. - PubMed
El‐Shaer 2007
-
- El‐Shaer WM. Lateral fold rotational flap technique for treatment if ingrown nail. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 2007;120(7):2131‐33. - PubMed
Gunal 2003
-
- Gunal I, Kosay C, Veziroglu A, Balkan Y, Ilhan F. Relationship between onychocryptosis and foot type and treatment with toe spacer. A preliminary investigation. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2003;93(1):33‐6. - PubMed
Heidelbaugh 2009
-
- Heidelbaugh JJ, Lee H. Management of the ingrown toenail. American Family Physician 2009;79(4):303‐8. - PubMed
Higgins 2008
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available on www.cochrane‐handbook.org, 2008.
Larsen 1971
-
- Larsen K. Orthonycsia. Regulation of nails [Ortonyksi. Negleregulering]. Ugeskr Laeg 1971;133(38):1867‐8. - PubMed
Ross 1969
-
- Ross WR. Treatment of the ingrown toenail and a new anesthetic method. Surgical Clinics of North America 1969;49(6):1499‐1504. - PubMed
Schulte 1998
-
- Schulte KW, Neumann NJ, Ruzicka T. Surgical Pearl: Nail splinting by flexible tube‐‐A new noninvasive treatment for ingrown toenails. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1998;39:629‐630. - PubMed
Westert 2005
-
- Westert GP, Schellevis FG, Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, Vander ZJ. Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. European Journal of Public Health 2005;15:59‐65. - PubMed
Winograd 1929
-
- Winograd AM. A modification in the technic of operation for ingrown toenail. Journal of the American Medical Association 1929;92(3):229‐230. - PubMed
Yang 2008
-
- Yang G, Yanchar NL, Lo AYS, Jones SA. Treatment of ingrown toenails in the pediatric population. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2008;43:931‐5. - PubMed
Zadik 1950
-
- Zadik FR. Obliteration of the nail bed of the great toe without shortening the terminal phalanx. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1950;32(1):66‐7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources