pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in care homes - PubMed

  • ️Sun Jan 01 2012

Review

A systematic mapping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in care homes

Adam L Gordon et al. BMC Geriatr. 2012.

Abstract

Background: A thorough understanding of the literature generated from research in care homes is required to support evidence-based commissioning and delivery of healthcare. So far this research has not been compiled or described. We set out to describe the extent of the evidence base derived from randomized controlled trials conducted in care homes.

Methods: A systematic mapping review was conducted of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in care homes. Medline was searched for "Nursing Home", "Residential Facilities" and "Homes for the Aged"; CINAHL for "nursing homes", "residential facilities" and "skilled nursing facilities"; AMED for "Nursing homes", "Long term care", "Residential facilities" and "Randomized controlled trial"; and BNI for "Nursing Homes", "Residential Care" and "Long-term care". Articles were classified against a keywording strategy describing: year and country of publication; randomization, stratification and blinding methodology; target of intervention; intervention and control treatments; number of subjects and/or clusters; outcome measures; and results.

Results: 3226 abstracts were identified and 291 articles reviewed in full. Most were recent (median age 6 years) and from the United States. A wide range of targets and interventions were identified. Studies were mostly functional (44 behaviour, 20 prescribing and 20 malnutrition studies) rather than disease-based. Over a quarter focussed on mental health.

Conclusions: This study is the first to collate data from all RCTs conducted in care homes and represents an important resource for those providing and commissioning healthcare for this sector. The evidence-base is rapidly developing. Several areas - influenza, falls, mobility, fractures, osteoporosis - are appropriate for systematic review. For other topics, researchers need to focus on outcome measures that can be compared and collated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Number of articles published by year.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Great Britain Department of Health. Care Standards Act 2000. London: Stationery Office; 2001.
    1. Bowman C, Whistler J, Ellerby M. A national census of care home residents. Age Ageing. 2004;33(6):561–566. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh177. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helton MR, Cohen LW, Zimmerman S, van der Steen JT. The Importance of Physician Presence in Nursing Homes for Residents with Dementia and Pneumonia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(1):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.01.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Katz PR, Karuza J, Intrator O, Mor V. Nursing Home Physician Specialists: A Response to the Workforce Crisis in Long-Term Care. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(6):411–413. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conroy S, Van Der Cammen T, Schols J, Van Balen R, Peteroff P, Luxton T. Medical services for older people in nursing homes — Comparing services in England and The Netherlands. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13(6):559–563. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0107-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources