A test of the 'genetic rescue' technique using bottlenecked donor populations of Drosophila melanogaster - PubMed
A test of the 'genetic rescue' technique using bottlenecked donor populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Sol Heber et al. PLoS One. 2012.
Abstract
We produced replicated experimental lines of inbred fruit flies Drosophila melanogaster to test the effects of crossing different bottlenecked populations as a method of 'genetic rescue' for endangered species lacking outbred donor populations. Two strains differing in the origin of the founders were maintained as isolated populations in a laboratory environment. After two generations of controlled full-sib matings, the resulting inbred fruit flies had significantly reduced breeding success and survival rates. However, crosses between the two bottlenecked strains reversed the effects of inbreeding and led to increases in breeding success and survival that persisted into the second generation of hybrid offspring. In contrast, crosses within each strain (but between different replicate lines) resulted in only slight improvements in some fitness components, and this positive trend was reversed in the second generation. This experiment highlights the potential value of translocations between different inbred populations of endangered species as a tool to mitigate the negative effects of inbreeding, but this benefit may depend upon the origin of the populations. Our results also confirm the importance of maintaining adequate levels of genetic variation within populations and that severely bottlenecked populations should not be discounted as possible donors in genetic rescue programs for endangered species.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d5ee/1d5eec55744ac1debef0df62afd452b3ee0e266a" alt="Figure 1"
Crosses (<$>\raster="rg1"<$>) identify replica lost during the process of inbreeding. In the between-strain F2 hybrids, offspring from hybrid-inbred matings resulted either from matings of F1 hybrids with Slg inbred or Wt inbred flies (only matings between F1 between-strain hybrids and Slg inbred flies are shown for simplicity). Pairs that did not lay any eggs are excluded from the calculations.
Similar articles
-
Jørgensen DB, Ørsted M, Kristensen TN. Jørgensen DB, et al. J Evol Biol. 2022 Jun;35(6):868-878. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14015. Epub 2022 May 9. J Evol Biol. 2022. PMID: 35532930 Free PMC article.
-
Heber S, Varsani A, Kuhn S, Girg A, Kempenaers B, Briskie J. Heber S, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 12;280(1752):20122228. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2228. Print 2013 Feb 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 23235701 Free PMC article.
-
Fluctuating asymmetry does not increase with moderate inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.
Fowler K, Whitlock MC. Fowler K, et al. Heredity (Edinb). 1994 Oct;73 ( Pt 4):373-6. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.184. Heredity (Edinb). 1994. PMID: 7989217
-
[Consequences of selection in highly inbred Drosophila strains].
Iovleva OV, Myl'nikov SV. Iovleva OV, et al. Genetika. 2007 Oct;43(10):1328-40. Genetika. 2007. PMID: 18069337 Review. Russian.
-
Genetic and environmental stress, and the persistence of populations.
Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Boerema AC, Van Putten WF. Bijlsma R, et al. EXS. 1997;83:193-207. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8882-0_11. EXS. 1997. PMID: 9342850 Review.
Cited by
-
Davis MA, Douglas MR, Webb CT, Collyer ML, Holycross AT, Painter CW, Kamees LK, Douglas ME. Davis MA, et al. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0131067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131067. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26114622 Free PMC article.
-
Jørgensen DB, Ørsted M, Kristensen TN. Jørgensen DB, et al. J Evol Biol. 2022 Jun;35(6):868-878. doi: 10.1111/jeb.14015. Epub 2022 May 9. J Evol Biol. 2022. PMID: 35532930 Free PMC article.
-
Mussmann SM, Douglas MR, Anthonysamy WJ, Davis MA, Simpson SA, Louis W, Douglas ME. Mussmann SM, et al. R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Feb 22;4(2):160736. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160736. eCollection 2017 Feb. R Soc Open Sci. 2017. PMID: 28386428 Free PMC article.
-
Kyriazis CC, Wayne RK, Lohmueller KE. Kyriazis CC, et al. Evol Lett. 2020 Dec 17;5(1):33-47. doi: 10.1002/evl3.209. eCollection 2021 Feb. Evol Lett. 2020. PMID: 33552534 Free PMC article.
-
Heber S, Varsani A, Kuhn S, Girg A, Kempenaers B, Briskie J. Heber S, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 12;280(1752):20122228. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2228. Print 2013 Feb 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2012. PMID: 23235701 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
-
- Newman D, Pilson D (1997) Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: Experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella . Evolution 51: 354–362. - PubMed
-
- England PR, Osler GHR, Woodworth LM, Montgomery ME, Briscoe DA, et al. (2003) Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Conserv Genet 4: 595–604.
-
- O’Grady JJ, Brook BW, Reed DH, Ballou JD, Tonkyn DW, et al. (2006) Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations. Biol Conserv 133: 42–51.
-
- Brook BW, Tonkyn DW, O’Grady JJ, Frankham R (2005) Contribution of inbreeding to extinction risk in threatened species. Conserv Ecol 6: 16.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
This project was funded by the University of Canterbury and the Brian Mason Science and Technical Trust (http://www.brianmasontrust.org/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases