Genetic analysis of chemosensory traits in human twins - PubMed
doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs070. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
Liang-Dar Hwang, Anna Lysenko, Fujiko F Duke, Brad Fesi, Amin Khoshnevisan, Rebecca S James, Charles J Wysocki, MeeRa Rhyu, Michael G Tordoff, Alexander A Bachmanov, Emi Mura, Hajime Nagai, Danielle R Reed
Affiliations
- PMID: 22977065
- PMCID: PMC3589946
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjs070
Genetic analysis of chemosensory traits in human twins
Antti Knaapila et al. Chem Senses. 2012 Nov.
Abstract
We explored genetic influences on the perception of taste and smell stimuli. Adult twins rated the chemosensory aspects of water, sucrose, sodium chloride, citric acid, ethanol, quinine hydrochloride, phenylthiocarbamide (PTC), potassium chloride, calcium chloride, cinnamon, androstenone, Galaxolide™, cilantro, and basil. For most traits, individual differences were stable over time and some traits were heritable (h(2) from 0.41 to 0.71). Subjects were genotyped for 44 single nucleotide polymorphisms within and near genes related to taste and smell. The results of these association analyses confirmed previous genotype-phenotype results for PTC, quinine, and androstenone. New associations were detected for ratings of basil and a bitter taste receptor gene, TAS2R60, and between cilantro and variants in three genes (TRPA1, GNAT3, and TAS2R50). The flavor of ethanol was related to variation within an olfactory receptor gene (OR7D4) and a gene encoding a subunit of the epithelial sodium channel (SCNN1D). Our study demonstrates that person-to-person differences in the taste and smell perception of simple foods and drinks are partially accounted for by genetic variation within chemosensory pathways.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34f9d/34f9d3a3e1f021e5a308246f64ceff565968f70f" alt="Figure 1"
Heatmap of reliable quantitative traits. Traits that are most highly positively correlated are shown in pink–red; negatively correlated traits, in blue–green. Specific r values are presented in
Supplemental Table 5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70876/70876dcb35e101b6fb56bf49ef3319079101d1e7" alt="Figure 2"
Detection of the odor of androstenone and Galaxolide by OR7D4 R88W (rs61729907) genotype: fraction of individuals who answered “No” to the question “Did you smell something?”
Similar articles
-
A genome-wide study on the perception of the odorants androstenone and galaxolide.
Knaapila A, Zhu G, Medland SE, Wysocki CJ, Montgomery GW, Martin NG, Wright MJ, Reed DR. Knaapila A, et al. Chem Senses. 2012 Jul;37(6):541-52. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs008. Epub 2012 Feb 23. Chem Senses. 2012. PMID: 22362865 Free PMC article.
-
Lunde K, Egelandsdal B, Skuterud E, Mainland JD, Lea T, Hersleth M, Matsunami H. Lunde K, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035259. Epub 2012 May 2. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22567099 Free PMC article.
-
Schütz M, Oertel BG, Heimann D, Doehring A, Walter C, Dimova V, Geisslinger G, Lötsch J. Schütz M, et al. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21;9(4):e95592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095592. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24752136 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Beyond the Flavour: The Potential Druggability of Chemosensory G Protein-Coupled Receptors.
Di Pizio A, Behrens M, Krautwurst D. Di Pizio A, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 20;20(6):1402. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061402. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30897734 Free PMC article. Review.
-
TRPA1 and cold transduction: an unresolved issue?
Caspani O, Heppenstall PA. Caspani O, et al. J Gen Physiol. 2009 Mar;133(3):245-9. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200810136. J Gen Physiol. 2009. PMID: 19237589 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Ong JS, Hwang LD, Zhong VW, An J, Gharahkhani P, Breslin PAS, Wright MJ, Lawlor DA, Whitfield J, MacGregor S, Martin NG, Cornelis MC. Ong JS, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 15;8(1):16414. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34713-z. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30442986 Free PMC article.
-
Taste Responses to Linoleic Acid: A Crowdsourced Population Study.
Garneau NL, Nuessle TM, Tucker RM, Yao M, Santorico SA, Mattes RD; Genetics of Taste Lab Citizen Scientists. Garneau NL, et al. Chem Senses. 2017 Oct 31;42(9):769-775. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjx058. Chem Senses. 2017. PMID: 28968903 Free PMC article.
-
Personal Variation in Preference for Sweetness: Effects of Age and Obesity.
Bobowski N, Mennella JA. Bobowski N, et al. Child Obes. 2017 Oct;13(5):369-376. doi: 10.1089/chi.2017.0023. Epub 2017 May 12. Child Obes. 2017. PMID: 28497993 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of cross-fostering on preference for calcium chloride in C57BL/6J and PWK/PhJ mice.
Voznesenskaya A, Tordoff MG. Voznesenskaya A, et al. Physiol Behav. 2013 Oct 2;122:159-62. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 13. Physiol Behav. 2013. PMID: 24041724 Free PMC article.
-
Pirastu N, Kooyman M, Traglia M, Robino A, Willems SM, Pistis G, Amin N, Sala C, Karssen LC, van Duijn CM, Toniolo D, Gasparini P. Pirastu N, et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Dec;23(12):1717-22. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.34. Epub 2015 Mar 11. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 25758996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Desor JA, Beauchamp GK. 1987. Longitudinal changes in sweet preferences in humans Physiol Behav. 39:639–641 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources