Identification of cation-binding sites on actin that drive polymerization and modulate bending stiffness - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2012
Identification of cation-binding sites on actin that drive polymerization and modulate bending stiffness
Hyeran Kang et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012.
Abstract
The assembly of actin monomers into filaments and networks plays vital roles throughout eukaryotic biology, including intracellular transport, cell motility, cell division, determining cellular shape, and providing cells with mechanical strength. The regulation of actin assembly and modulation of filament mechanical properties are critical for proper actin function. It is well established that physiological salt concentrations promote actin assembly and alter the overall bending mechanics of assembled filaments and networks. However, the molecular origins of these salt-dependent effects, particularly if they involve nonspecific ionic strength effects or specific ion-binding interactions, are unknown. Here, we demonstrate that specific cation binding at two discrete sites situated between adjacent subunits along the long-pitch helix drive actin polymerization and determine the filament bending rigidity. We classify the two sites as "polymerization" and "stiffness" sites based on the effects that mutations at the sites have on salt-dependent filament assembly and bending mechanics, respectively. These results establish the existence and location of the cation-binding sites that confer salt dependence to the assembly and mechanics of actin filaments.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93128/93128f58847868be266bbd9d183142440670e880" alt="Fig. 1."
Specific cation binding drives actin polymerization. Linear fits of the activity coefficient (γ) corrected cation concentration dependence of Kpolym (rabbit skeletal muscle actin, 5% pyrene labeled) yields slopes of 1.18 ± 0.02, 0.46 ± 0.10, 0.91 ± 0.09, and 0.83 ± 0.02, for K+, Na+, Mg2+, or Ca2+, respectively. Uncertainty bars represent the standard error (SEM).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52be0/52be04398aec98b3b03174497efe36348e6dc434" alt="Fig. 2."
Cation binding stiffens actin filaments. Bending persistence length (Lp) of actin filaments (rabbit skeletal muscle actin, Alexa 488 labeled) in K+, Na+, Mg2+, or Ca2+. Uncertainty bars represent SEM.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc181/fc181e3ea47cd39b190874d534a9a0b50f942dab" alt="Fig. 3."
Structural bioinformatics predicts two classes of discrete actin filament-specific cation-binding sites. The actin filament on the left (PDB ID 3MFP “biological assembly”) is oriented with the barbed end at the bottom, and is colored by subunit. The central subunit is rendered as a cartoon showing the location of the predicted cation-binding sites. “Polymerization” sites (green spheres) have the highest prediction score from comparing WebFEATURE cation-binding site prediction results between the F-actin monomer (3MFP) and F-actin polymer (3MFP “biological assembly,” Materials and Methods). “Stiffness” sites (purple spheres) have the highest prediction score from comparing WebFEATURE cation-binding site prediction results between the G-actin monomer (PDB ID 1J6Z) and F-actin monomer (3MFP).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3486/d348654ab3c7c680ea9b4111d3de05e079221de0" alt="Fig. 4."
The “stiffness site” controls the cation dependence of actin filament rigidity. Bending persistence length (Lp) of A167E mutant yeast actin (Alexa 488 labeled) filaments increases with Mg2+-binding, whereas wt filaments shows no [Mg2+] dependence of Lp. Uncertainty bars represent SEM.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99f81/99f81cc7cdf583bfdd3bcbe8304682981c6539ff" alt="Fig. 5."
The “polymerization site” modulates the cation dependence of the critical concentration. T203C yeast actin shows little or no polymerization at 0.2 mM Mg2+ (Cc > 15 μM), Cc at 1 mM Mg2+ that is higher (Cc = 8.9 μM) than that of wt yeast actin, but a Cc value comparable to that of wt is achieved at 5 mM Mg2+. Uncertainty bars represent SEM.
Similar articles
-
Regulation of actin by ion-linked equilibria.
Kang H, Bradley MJ, Elam WA, De La Cruz EM. Kang H, et al. Biophys J. 2013 Dec 17;105(12):2621-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.032. Biophys J. 2013. PMID: 24359734 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cations Stiffen Actin Filaments by Adhering a Key Structural Element to Adjacent Subunits.
Hocky GM, Baker JL, Bradley MJ, Sinitskiy AV, De La Cruz EM, Voth GA. Hocky GM, et al. J Phys Chem B. 2016 May 26;120(20):4558-67. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b02741. Epub 2016 May 13. J Phys Chem B. 2016. PMID: 27146246 Free PMC article.
-
Steinmetz MO, Hoenger A, Stoffler D, Noegel AA, Aebi U, Schoenenberger CA. Steinmetz MO, et al. J Mol Biol. 2000 Oct 20;303(2):171-84. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4129. J Mol Biol. 2000. PMID: 11023784
-
Colavin A, Hsin J, Huang KC. Colavin A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3585-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317061111. Epub 2014 Feb 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24550504 Free PMC article.
-
Carlier MF, Valentin-Ranc C, Combeau C, Fievez S, Pantoloni D. Carlier MF, et al. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994;358:71-81. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2578-3_7. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994. PMID: 7801813 Review.
Cited by
-
Mao W, Renner LD, Cornilleau C, Li de la Sierra-Gallay I, Afensiss S, Benlamara S, Ah-Seng Y, Van Tilbeurgh H, Nessler S, Bertin A, Chastanet A, Carballido-Lopez R. Mao W, et al. Elife. 2023 Oct 11;12:e84505. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84505. Elife. 2023. PMID: 37818717 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer cells become less deformable and more invasive with activation of β-adrenergic signaling.
Kim TH, Gill NK, Nyberg KD, Nguyen AV, Hohlbauch SV, Geisse NA, Nowell CJ, Sloan EK, Rowat AC. Kim TH, et al. J Cell Sci. 2016 Dec 15;129(24):4563-4575. doi: 10.1242/jcs.194803. Epub 2016 Nov 14. J Cell Sci. 2016. PMID: 27875276 Free PMC article.
-
Regulation of actin by ion-linked equilibria.
Kang H, Bradley MJ, Elam WA, De La Cruz EM. Kang H, et al. Biophys J. 2013 Dec 17;105(12):2621-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.032. Biophys J. 2013. PMID: 24359734 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scipion CPM, Ghoshdastider U, Ferrer FJ, Yuen TY, Wongsantichon J, Robinson RC. Scipion CPM, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 9;115(41):10345-10350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806394115. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 30254171 Free PMC article.
-
A successful hybrid deep learning model aiming at promoter identification.
Wang Y, Peng Q, Mou X, Wang X, Li H, Han T, Sun Z, Wang X. Wang Y, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 May 31;23(Suppl 1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04735-6. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022. PMID: 35641900 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Holmes KC, Popp D, Gebhard W, Kabsch W. Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature. 1990;347:44–49. - PubMed
-
- Ariel G, Andelman D. Polyelectrolyte persistence length: Attractive effect of counterion correlations and fluctuations. Europhys Lett. 2003;61:67–73.
-
- Pollard TD, Cooper J. Actin and actin-binding proteins: A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:987–1035. - PubMed
-
- Korn ED, Carlier MF, Pantaloni D. Actin polymerization and ATP hydrolysis. Science. 1987;238:638–644. - PubMed
-
- Oosawa F, Kasai M. Theory of linear and helical aggregations of macromolecules. J Mol Biol. 1962;4:10–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases