Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape - PubMed
Regions of homozygosity in the porcine genome: consequence of demography and the recombination landscape
Mirte Bosse et al. PLoS Genet. 2012.
Abstract
Inbreeding has long been recognized as a primary cause of fitness reduction in both wild and domesticated populations. Consanguineous matings cause inheritance of haplotypes that are identical by descent (IBD) and result in homozygous stretches along the genome of the offspring. Size and position of regions of homozygosity (ROHs) are expected to correlate with genomic features such as GC content and recombination rate, but also direction of selection. Thus, ROHs should be non-randomly distributed across the genome. Therefore, demographic history may not fully predict the effects of inbreeding. The porcine genome has a relatively heterogeneous distribution of recombination rate, making Sus scrofa an excellent model to study the influence of both recombination landscape and demography on genomic variation. This study utilizes next-generation sequencing data for the analysis of genomic ROH patterns, using a comparative sliding window approach. We present an in-depth study of genomic variation based on three different parameters: nucleotide diversity outside ROHs, the number of ROHs in the genome, and the average ROH size. We identified an abundance of ROHs in all genomes of multiple pigs from commercial breeds and wild populations from Eurasia. Size and number of ROHs are in agreement with known demography of the populations, with population bottlenecks highly increasing ROH occurrence. Nucleotide diversity outside ROHs is high in populations derived from a large ancient population, regardless of current population size. In addition, we show an unequal genomic ROH distribution, with strong correlations of ROH size and abundance with recombination rate and GC content. Global gene content does not correlate with ROH frequency, but some ROH hotspots do contain positive selected genes in commercial lines and wild populations. This study highlights the importance of the influence of demography and recombination on homozygosity in the genome to understand the effects of inbreeding.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/fb2011a006e7/pgen.1003100.g001.gif)
The distributions of ROH statistics for Asian breeds (n = 7), Asian wild boars(n = 5), European breeds (n = 29), European wild boars (n = 6) and other species (n = 5). Groups are divided based on geography (Asians and Europeans), domestication (pigs and wild boars) and speciation (Other-species include the African Warthog Phacochoerus africanus and other representatives of the Sus genus being Sus barbatus, Sus celebensis, Sus verrucosus and Sus cebifrons). Values are averaged within individuals resulting in a single data point per ROH characteristic for each individual. 1A. nucleotide diversity including ROHs (*10−4 bp) 1B. nucleotide diversity excluding ROHs (*10−4 bp) 1C. Average ROH size (*104 bp) 1D. number of ROHs in the genomes of individuals.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/54413ae7e90c/pgen.1003100.g002.gif)
2A. The average number of ROHs belonging to three size classes small (<100 Kbp) medium (0.1 to 5 Mbp) and large (>5 Mbp) for each of the different groups. 2B. The total size of the genome that is covered by the particular ROH size class in one individual, averaged per group. The Japanese wild boar is shown separately and is not included in the Asian group, as its demographic history from an island population and the associated ROH pattern is very distinct from all other sampled individuals. Asian wild boars (n = 4), Asian pigs (n = 7), European wild boars (n = 6), European pigs (n = 29), other species (n = 5).
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/9098b5bfa4e9/pgen.1003100.g003.gif)
3A shows the correlation between both methods when the total sum of ROHs is taken from the re-sequencing method (‘Genomic ROHsum’) and the 60K chip method (‘60K ROHsum’). In 3B the correlation is shown when only the ROHs over 5 Mbp are taken into account for the re-sequencing method. The outlier for the Asian group (the Japanese wild boar) is not included in the R2 calculations.
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/ec67382679a8/pgen.1003100.g004.gif)
Number of ROHs and sum of ROHs detected by PLINK for all 241 individuals genotyped by the Illumina porcine 60k beadchip. Sum of ROHsize is *1000 bp. 4A. ROHs in domesticated individuals. Asian pigs are shown in red, orange and purple and the European pigs are in blue and green. 4B. ROHs in wild individuals. Asian wild boars are shown in red and orange and the European wild populations are displayed in green and blue. The dashed line represents the range of ROH number and ROH size for the domesticated individuals. The individuals marked with * are putative hybrids.
![Figure 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/30f4ee5b8fe2/pgen.1003100.g005.gif)
On the x-axis, the number of ROHs in the genome per individual is plotted, the average ROH size (*104 bp) is displayed on the y-axis and the nucleotide diversity outside ROHs in a 10 kb window ‘nucleotide diversity (π-out *10−4)’ on the z-axis. Coloration is based on relatedness and geography, with individuals from the same populations having the same color.
![Figure 6](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/5cdd7faebfda/pgen.1003100.g006.gif)
Physical distribution of total nucleotide diversity (6A), nucleotide diversity outside ROHs (6B), GC content (6C), recombination rate (6D) over chromosomes. Relative chromosomal position is averaged for all chromosomes so that 0.0 represents the left telomeric region and 1.0 the far right telomere.
![Figure 7](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0029/3510040/c50ecb5869a1/pgen.1003100.g007.gif)
ROHs were split into three size classes; big (x>5 Mbp), medium (0.1 to 5 Mbp) and small (x<0.1 Mbp). The distribution is relative only to the total number of ROH bins in that particular size class, and the distributions are averaged over all chromosomes. ROH distribution is given for four groups: European pigs (7A), European wild boars (7B), Asian pigs (7C) and Asian wild boars (including the Japanese, 7D).
Similar articles
-
Schiavo G, Bovo S, Muñoz M, Ribani A, Alves E, Araújo JP, Bozzi R, Čandek-Potokar M, Charneca R, Fernandez AI, Gallo M, García F, Karolyi D, Kušec G, Martins JM, Mercat MJ, Núñez Y, Quintanilla R, Radović Č, Razmaite V, Riquet J, Savić R, Usai G, Utzeri VJ, Zimmer C, Ovilo C, Fontanesi L. Schiavo G, et al. Anim Genet. 2021 Apr;52(2):155-170. doi: 10.1111/age.13045. Epub 2021 Feb 5. Anim Genet. 2021. PMID: 33544919
-
Berghöfer J, Khaveh N, Mundlos S, Metzger J. Berghöfer J, et al. BMC Genomics. 2022 Aug 6;23(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08801-4. BMC Genomics. 2022. PMID: 35933356 Free PMC article.
-
The pattern of runs of homozygosity and genomic inbreeding in world-wide sheep populations.
Nosrati M, Asadollahpour Nanaei H, Javanmard A, Esmailizadeh A. Nosrati M, et al. Genomics. 2021 May;113(3):1407-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 8. Genomics. 2021. PMID: 33705888
-
Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock.
Peripolli E, Munari DP, Silva MVGB, Lima ALF, Irgang R, Baldi F. Peripolli E, et al. Anim Genet. 2017 Jun;48(3):255-271. doi: 10.1111/age.12526. Epub 2016 Dec 1. Anim Genet. 2017. PMID: 27910110 Review.
-
[Runs of homozygosity and its application on livestock genome study].
Liu G, Sun FZ, Zhu FX, Feng HY, Han X. Liu G, et al. Yi Chuan. 2019 Apr 20;41(4):304-317. doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.18-287. Yi Chuan. 2019. PMID: 30992252 Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Li M, Chen L, Tian S, Lin Y, Tang Q, Zhou X, Li D, Yeung CKL, Che T, Jin L, Fu Y, Ma J, Wang X, Jiang A, Lan J, Pan Q, Liu Y, Luo Z, Guo Z, Liu H, Zhu L, Shuai S, Tang G, Zhao J, Jiang Y, Bai L, Zhang S, Mai M, Li C, Wang D, Gu Y, Wang G, Lu H, Li Y, Zhu H, Li Z, Li M, Gladyshev VN, Jiang Z, Zhao S, Wang J, Li R, Li X. Li M, et al. Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):865-874. doi: 10.1101/gr.207456.116. Epub 2016 Sep 19. Genome Res. 2017. PMID: 27646534 Free PMC article.
-
Yuan J, Kitchener AC, Lackey LB, Sun T, Jiangzuo Q, Tuohetahong Y, Zhao L, Yang P, Wang G, Huang C, Wang J, Hou W, Liu Y, Chen W, Mi D, Murphy WJ, Li G. Yuan J, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 9;121(2):e2310763120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310763120. Epub 2024 Jan 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024. PMID: 38165928 Free PMC article.
-
Modiba MC, Nephawe KA, Wang J, Hlongwane N, Hadebe K, Lu W, Mtileni B. Modiba MC, et al. Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 14;12(12):1546. doi: 10.3390/ani12121546. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35739882 Free PMC article.
-
Genomic structure of a crossbred Landrace pig population.
Joaquim LB, Chud TCS, Marchesi JAP, Savegnago RP, Buzanskas ME, Zanella R, Cantão ME, Peixoto JO, Ledur MC, Irgang R, Munari DP. Joaquim LB, et al. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212266. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30818344 Free PMC article.
-
Hidalgo AM, Bastiaansen JW, Harlizius B, Megens HJ, Madsen O, Crooijmans RP, Groenen MA. Hidalgo AM, et al. BMC Genet. 2014 Jan 9;15:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-4. BMC Genet. 2014. PMID: 24405739 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ku CS, Naidoo N, Teo SM, Pawitan Y (2011) Regions of homozygosity and their impact on complex diseases and traits. Hum Genet 129: 1–15. - PubMed
-
- Vine AE, McQuillin A, Bass NJ, Pereira A, Kandaswamy R, et al. (2009) No evidence for excess runs of homozygosity in bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Genet 19: 165–170. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous