Transcriptome comparison and gene coexpression network analysis provide a systems view of citrus response to 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' infection - PubMed
- ️Tue Jan 01 2013
Transcriptome comparison and gene coexpression network analysis provide a systems view of citrus response to 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' infection
Zhi-Liang Zheng et al. BMC Genomics. 2013.
Abstract
Background: Huanglongbing (HLB) is arguably the most destructive disease for the citrus industry. HLB is caused by infection of the bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter spp. Several citrus GeneChip studies have revealed thousands of genes that are up- or down-regulated by infection with Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus. However, whether and how these host genes act to protect against HLB remains poorly understood.
Results: As a first step towards a mechanistic view of citrus in response to the HLB bacterial infection, we performed a comparative transcriptome analysis and found that a total of 21 Probesets are commonly up-regulated by the HLB bacterial infection. In addition, a number of genes are likely regulated specifically at early, late or very late stages of the infection. Furthermore, using Pearson correlation coefficient-based gene coexpression analysis, we constructed a citrus HLB response network consisting of 3,507 Probesets and 56,287 interactions. Genes involved in carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolic processes, transport, defense, signaling and hormone response were overrepresented in the HLB response network and the subnetworks for these processes were constructed. Analysis of the defense and hormone response subnetworks indicates that hormone response is interconnected with defense response. In addition, mapping the commonly up-regulated HLB responsive genes into the HLB response network resulted in a core subnetwork where transport plays a key role in the citrus response to the HLB bacterial infection. Moreover, analysis of a phloem protein subnetwork indicates a role for this protein and zinc transporters or zinc-binding proteins in the citrus HLB defense response.
Conclusion: Through integrating transcriptome comparison and gene coexpression network analysis, we have provided for the first time a systems view of citrus in response to the Ca. Liberibacter spp. infection causing HLB.
Figures

HLB response network. The citrus HLB response network is displayed using Cytoscape. A white circle represents a node (Probeset), and a black edge connecting the two nodes indicates an interaction (coexpression) with a Pcc value of > =0.93. Six categories of major biological processes are color-coded.

Summary of the network characteristics. The distribution of number of nodes (Probesets) in different ranges of edge numbers (1; 2; 3–10; 11–50, 51–100; 101–150; 151–200; 201–250; 251–300; and 300–369) in the HLB response network is presented.

HLB disease response subnetwork. (A) The HLB defense subnetwork is displayed with three categories of major biological processes highlighted by different colors. (B) The close-up of the box in the subnetwork shown in Figure 3A.

HLB hormore subnetwork. The HLB hormone response subnetwork is displayed, with six hormone response groups coded with distinct colors.

SA response subnetwor. The SA hormone response subnetwork is displayed. Nine large hubs are labeled with Probeset ID.

A subset of SA response subnetwork. A subset of the SA hormone response subnetwork with four large hubs is displayed.

Early stage HLB response subnetwork. The HLB early response subnetwork is displayed. Nodes belonging to five categories of major biological processes are coded with distinct colors. The arrows indicate the two nodes (Probesets) that are discussed in the text.

Early stage HLB response subnetworks based on two representative genes. Two gene-specific subnetworks are displayed with all Probesets labeled. (A) A subset of early stage HLB response subnetwork centered on the hub Cit.29252.1.S1_s_at. Because many second degree interactions exist for most of the first degree nodes connecting to Cit.29252.1.S1_s_at, only the first degree interaction-based subnetwork is presented. (B) The NAC096 transcription factor subnetwork is displayed.

HLB response core subnetwork. The HLB response core subnetwork is constructed using the 21 commonly up-regulated Probesets (see Table 2) as the seed nodes (highlighted in red). First degree interactions are shown. Green nodes indicate “transport”, yellow nodes represent “hormone response”, and blue nodes indicate “carbohydrate metabolic process”. Nodes overlapped in the categories of “transport” and “hormone response” exhibit a mixed color of green and yellow.

Phloem protein (PP2) subnetwork. The subnetworks for the PP2, based on first (A) and second (B) degree neighbors of Cit.35955.1.S1_at. Six of the Probesets belonging to the second degree interactions (B) are labeled with yellow.
Similar articles
-
Kim JS, Sagaram US, Burns JK, Li JL, Wang N. Kim JS, et al. Phytopathology. 2009 Jan;99(1):50-7. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-1-0050. Phytopathology. 2009. PMID: 19055434
-
Killiny N, Nehela Y. Killiny N, et al. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017 Aug;30(8):666-678. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-17-0106-R. Epub 2017 Jun 14. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017. PMID: 28510485
-
Teixeira DDC, Saillard C, Eveillard S, Danet JL, Costa PID, Ayres AJ, Bové J. Teixeira DDC, et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Sep;55(Pt 5):1857-1862. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63677-0. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005. PMID: 16166678
-
Citrus huanglongbing: a newly relevant disease presents unprecedented challenges.
Wang N, Trivedi P. Wang N, et al. Phytopathology. 2013 Jul;103(7):652-65. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-12-12-0331-RVW. Phytopathology. 2013. PMID: 23441969 Review.
-
Merfa MV, Pérez-López E, Naranjo E, Jain M, Gabriel DW, De La Fuente L. Merfa MV, et al. Phytopathology. 2019 Jul;109(7):1092-1101. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-02-19-0051-RVW. Epub 2019 Jun 3. Phytopathology. 2019. PMID: 30998129 Review.
Cited by
-
Mathé C, Fawal N, Roux C, Dunand C. Mathé C, et al. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 30;9(1):20373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56774-4. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31889110 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Coexpression Networks with GWAS to Prioritize Causal Genes in Maize.
Schaefer RJ, Michno JM, Jeffers J, Hoekenga O, Dilkes B, Baxter I, Myers CL. Schaefer RJ, et al. Plant Cell. 2018 Dec;30(12):2922-2942. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00299. Epub 2018 Nov 9. Plant Cell. 2018. PMID: 30413654 Free PMC article.
-
Annotation of gene function in citrus using gene expression information and co-expression networks.
Wong DC, Sweetman C, Ford CM. Wong DC, et al. BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Jul 15;14:186. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-186. BMC Plant Biol. 2014. PMID: 25023870 Free PMC article.
-
Liu P, Chen K, Li G, Yang X, Long CA. Liu P, et al. BMC Genomics. 2016 Jan 4;17:17. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2333-3. BMC Genomics. 2016. PMID: 26725242 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular signatures between citrus and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus.
Hu B, Rao MJ, Deng X, Pandey SS, Hendrich C, Ding F, Wang N, Xu Q. Hu B, et al. PLoS Pathog. 2021 Dec 9;17(12):e1010071. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010071. eCollection 2021 Dec. PLoS Pathog. 2021. PMID: 34882744 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Zhao XY. Citrus yellow shoot disease (huanglongbing) in China-a. Review. Proc Int Citriculture. 1981;1:466–469.
-
- de Graça JV. Citrus greening disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;29:109–136.
-
- Wang N, Li W, Irey M, Albrigo G, Bo K, Kim JS. Citrus huanglongbing. Tree Forestry Science Biotechnology. 2009;3:67–72.
-
- Duan Y, Zhou L, Hall DG, Li W, Doddapaneni H, Lin H, Liu L, Vahling CM, Gabriel DW, Williams KP. et al.Complete genome sequence of citrus huanglongbing bacterium, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ obtained through metagenomics. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2009;22(8):1011–1020. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-8-1011. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous