pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Cognitive theory development as we know it: specificity, explanatory power, and the brain - PubMed

Cognitive theory development as we know it: specificity, explanatory power, and the brain

Davide Crepaldi et al. Front Psychol. 2013.

No abstract available

A commentary on Future Morphology? Summary of visual word identification effects draws attention to necessary efforts in understanding morphological processing by Koester, D. (2012). Front. Psychology 3:395. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00395

1. Amenta S., Crepaldi D. (2012). Morphological processing as we know it: an analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Front. Psychology 3:232 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00232 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
1. Baayen R., Milin P., Filipović Djurdjević D., Hendrix P., Marelli M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychol. Rev. 118, 438–481 10.1037/a0023851 - DOI - PubMed
1. Baayen R. H., Wurm L. H., Aycock J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: a regression study across tasks and modalities. Ment. Lexicon 2, 419–463
1. Bowers J. (2009). On the biological plausibility of grandmother cells: implications for neural network theories in psychology and neuroscience. Psychol. Rev. 116, 220–251 10.1037/a0014462 - DOI - PubMed
1. Coltheart M. (1982). The psycholinguistic analysis of acquired dyslexias: some illustrations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 298, 151–164 10.1098/rstb.1982.0078 - DOI - PubMed