Antigen-specific tolerance by autologous myelin peptide-coupled cells: a phase 1 trial in multiple sclerosis - PubMed
- ️Tue Jan 01 2013
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Jun 5;5(188):188ra75.
doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006168.
Sara Yousef, Andreas Sputtek, Klarissa H Stürner, Jan-Patrick Stellmann, Petra Breiden, Stefanie Reinhardt, Christian Schulze, Maxim Bester, Christoph Heesen, Sven Schippling, Stephen D Miller, Mireia Sospedra, Roland Martin
Affiliations
- PMID: 23740901
- PMCID: PMC3973034
- DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006168
Clinical Trial
Antigen-specific tolerance by autologous myelin peptide-coupled cells: a phase 1 trial in multiple sclerosis
Andreas Lutterotti et al. Sci Transl Med. 2013.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a devastating inflammatory disease of the brain and spinal cord that is thought to result from an autoimmune attack directed against antigens in the central nervous system. The aim of this first-in-man trial was to assess the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of a tolerization regimen in MS patients that uses a single infusion of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells chemically coupled with seven myelin peptides (MOG1-20, MOG35-55, MBP13-32, MBP83-99, MBP111-129, MBP146-170, and PLP139-154). An open-label, single-center, dose-escalation study was performed in seven relapsing-remitting and two secondary progressive MS patients who were off-treatment for standard therapies. All patients had to show T cell reactivity against at least one of the myelin peptides used in the trial. Neurological, magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory, and immunological examinations were performed to assess the safety, tolerability, and in vivo mechanisms of action of this regimen. Administration of antigen-coupled cells was feasible, had a favorable safety profile, and was well tolerated in MS patients. Patients receiving the higher doses (>1 × 10(9)) of peptide-coupled cells had a decrease in antigen-specific T cell responses after peptide-coupled cell therapy. In summary, this first-in-man clinical trial of autologous peptide-coupled cells in MS patients establishes the feasibility and indicates good tolerability and safety of this therapeutic approach.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: A.L., S.D.M., and R.M. are listed as co-inventors on a University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf patent (EP# 08845159.6: Use of modified cells for the treatment of multiple sclerosis) related to the use of antigen-coupled cells in MS. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/3021a457746e/nihms566419f1.gif)
(A) The first six patients were followed before treatment with two clinical, MRI, and laboratory examinations at month −1 before treatment and day 0 and after treatment at weeks 2 and 6 and 3 months. Vital signs and AEs were recorded during infusion; 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 4 hours after infusion; and on day +1, day +3, week +2, week +3, week +6, and month +3. General physical examination was performed at month −1 and day +1. Neurological examination was done at month −1, day −1, week +2, week +6, and month +3. Brain MRI was assessed at month −1, day −1, week +2, week +6, and month +3. MSIS29 was assessed at month −1, day +1, week +6, and month +3. Patients were further followed for AEs, serious AEs (SAEs), and clinical and MRI disease activity at months +4, +5, and +6. The last three patients were followed at four time points (month −3 to day 0) before treatment, and further examinations were performed at week 2 and months 1, 2, 3, and 6 (scattered lines). (B) Patients were admitted to the phase 1 unit the day before treatment. At day 0, leukapheresis was performed. The autologous cell product manufactured was infused the same day, and patients were monitored for AEs for 24 hours. (C) Most important steps of the manufacturing process, which was performed in blood bags while maintaining a closed system. Erythrocytes are lysed with lysis buffer. The peptides are added, and the coupling procedure is initiated by addition of EDC. After quality control (QC), the ETIMS cell product is used for therapy. * includes washing steps and cell counting. RBCs, red blood cells.
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/c7bdca1b8381/nihms566419f2.gif)
Absolute peripheral blood counts (means ± SEM) of eosinophils, basophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets before and after treatment. Dotted lines indicate the time point of study drug administration.
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/1eb2d7dc15af/nihms566419f3.gif)
Clinical exacerbations in the year before treatment (gray circles), during the first 3 months after treatment (black circles), and during the safety follow-up until month 6 for the nine patients included in the trial. Dose of ETIMS is shown on the right side. Dotted lines indicate the time point of study drug administration.
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/7b407f83c198/nihms566419f4.gif)
EDSS (left graphs), SNRS (middle graphs), and MSIS29 (right graphs) in patients 1 to 6 (upper graphs; means ± SEM) and in patients 7, 8, and 10 (lower graphs) before and after treatment. Dotted lines indicate the time point of study drug administration.
![Fig. 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/5b96b6e12b69/nihms566419f5.gif)
New T2 lesions (left graphs) and CELs (right graphs) in patients 1 to 6 (upper graphs; means ± SEM) and in patients 7, 8, and 10 (lower graphs). T2 lesion graphs: y axis is number of T2 lesions; first column in gray indicates the number of total T2 lesions 3 months before study drug administration; columns in black indicate new T2 lesions before and after treatment. CEL graphs: y axis is number of new CELs (both brain and spinal cord CELs); new CELs before and after treatment are shown. Dotted lines indicate the time point of study drug administration.
![Fig. 6](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/dea3e48a412b/nihms566419f6.gif)
(A to C) Percentage of (A) B cells (CD45+CD19+), monocytes (CD45+CD14+), T cells (CD45+CD3+CD56−), NK cells (CD45+CD3−CD56+), and NK T cells (CD45+CD3+CD56+); (B) CD4+ T cells (CD3+CD4+CD8−), including TH1 (CD4+IFN-γ+), TH17 (CD4+IL-17+), TH2 (CD4+IL-4+), Tregs (CD4+FoxP3+), and Tr1 (CD4+IL-10+); and (C) CD8+ T cells (CD3+CD4+CD8+), including regulatory CD8+ (CD8+CD57+ILT2+) and proinflammatory CD8+ (CD8+CD161high) measured by flow-cytometry in patients 6, 7, 8, and 10 before (month −1) and after (month 3) ETIMS treatment. Means ± SEM is shown. Dotted lines indicate the time point of study drug administration.
![Fig. 7](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/908b/3973034/91e5922d1d73/nihms566419f7.gif)
MOG1–20, MOG35–55, MBP13–32, MBP83–99, MBP111–129, MBP146–170, PLP139–154, tetanus toxoid (TTx)–specific T cell responses, and unstimulated wells before and 3 months after ETIMS treatment in patients treated with low (1 × 103 to 5 × 108, patients 1 to 5; left panel) or high (1 × 109 to 3 × 109, patients 6, 7, 8, and 10; right panel) dose of antigen-coupled cells. Proliferative responses were measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. Graphs (y axis) represent the scintillation counts per minute (CPM). The dotted lines represent the threshold set for the mean + 3 SDs of unstimulated wells. All wells above this threshold are shown in red.
Similar articles
-
Using myelin antigen--coupled autologous cells for treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Bawany FI, Khan MS. Bawany FI, et al. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Jan;64(1):115. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014. PMID: 24605733 No abstract available.
-
Bar-Or A, Vollmer T, Antel J, Arnold DL, Bodner CA, Campagnolo D, Gianettoni J, Jalili F, Kachuck N, Lapierre Y, Niino M, Oger J, Price M, Rhodes S, Robinson WH, Shi FD, Utz PJ, Valone F, Weiner L, Steinman L, Garren H. Bar-Or A, et al. Arch Neurol. 2007 Oct;64(10):1407-15. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.10.nct70002. Epub 2007 Aug 13. Arch Neurol. 2007. PMID: 17698695 Clinical Trial.
-
Kaushansky N, Kerlero de Rosbo N, Zilkha-Falb R, Yosef-Hemo R, Cohen L, Ben-Nun A. Kaushansky N, et al. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027860. Epub 2011 Nov 29. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22140475 Free PMC article.
-
Myelin peptides in multiple sclerosis.
Grau-López L, Raïch D, Ramo-Tello C, Naranjo-Gómez M, Dàvalos A, Pujol-Borrell R, Borràs FE, Martínez-Cáceres E. Grau-López L, et al. Autoimmun Rev. 2009 Jul;8(8):650-3. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Feb 12. Autoimmun Rev. 2009. PMID: 19393199 Review.
-
Mitoxantrone: a review of its use in multiple sclerosis.
Scott LJ, Figgitt DP. Scott LJ, et al. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(6):379-96. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418060-00010. CNS Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15089110 Review.
Cited by
-
Engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials for type 1 diabetes.
Stabler CL, Li Y, Stewart JM, Keselowsky BG. Stabler CL, et al. Nat Rev Mater. 2019 Jun;4(6):429-450. doi: 10.1038/s41578-019-0112-5. Epub 2019 May 17. Nat Rev Mater. 2019. PMID: 32617176 Free PMC article.
-
Kleist C, Mohr E, Gaikwad S, Dittmar L, Kuerten S, Platten M, Mier W, Schmitt M, Opelz G, Terness P. Kleist C, et al. J Transl Med. 2016 May 1;14(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0860-6. J Transl Med. 2016. PMID: 27131971 Free PMC article.
-
Tissue-Targeted Drug Delivery Strategies to Promote Antigen-Specific Immune Tolerance.
Rui Y, Eppler HB, Yanes AA, Jewell CM. Rui Y, et al. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023 Jan;12(6):e2202238. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202238. Epub 2022 Dec 15. Adv Healthc Mater. 2023. PMID: 36417578 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Harnessing nanoparticles for immune modulation.
Getts DR, Shea LD, Miller SD, King NJ. Getts DR, et al. Trends Immunol. 2015 Jul;36(7):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 15. Trends Immunol. 2015. PMID: 26088391 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Engineering Cell Membrane-Based Nanotherapeutics to Target Inflammation.
Yan H, Shao D, Lao YH, Li M, Hu H, Leong KW. Yan H, et al. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019 May 22;6(15):1900605. doi: 10.1002/advs.201900605. eCollection 2019 Aug 7. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019. PMID: 31406672 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Lutterotti A, Sospedra M, Martin R. Antigen-specific therapies in MS—Current concepts and novel approaches. J Neurol Sci. 2008;274:18–22. - PubMed
-
- Sospedra M, Martin R. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:683–747. - PubMed
-
- Goebels N, Hofstetter H, Schmidt S, Brunner C, Wekerle H, Hohlfeld R. Repertoire dynamics of autoreactive T cells in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy subjects: Epitope spreading versus clonal persistence. Brain. 2000;123(Pt. 3):508–518. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases