Potential diagnostic consequences of applying non-invasive prenatal testing: population-based study from a country with existing first-trimester screening - PubMed
doi: 10.1002/uog.13270. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
Collaborators, Affiliations
- PMID: 24375770
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.13270
Free article
Potential diagnostic consequences of applying non-invasive prenatal testing: population-based study from a country with existing first-trimester screening
O B Petersen et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar.
Free article
Abstract
Objectives: Targeted non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) tests for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies and could be an alternative to traditional karyotyping. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of missing other abnormal karyotypes of probable phenotypic significance by NIPT.
Methods: This was a retrospective population-based analysis of all singleton pregnancies booked for combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) in Denmark over a 4-year period. Data concerning maternal demographics, cFTS and prenatal or postnatal karyotypes were collected from the Danish Fetal Medicine database. Karyotypes were classified according to whether the chromosomal anomaly would have been detected by NIPT and whether it was likely to affect phenotype.
Results: cFTS was completed in 193638 pregnancies. 10205 (5.3%) had cytogenetic or molecular analysis performed. Of these, 1122 (11.0%) had an abnormal karyotype, of which 262 (23.4%) would have been missed by NIPT, but would probably have been clinically significant. The prevalence of such 'atypical abnormal karyotypes' was increased in women above 45 years of age, in pregnancies with increased nuchal translucency (NT) thickness (≥ 3.5 mm), with abnormal levels of free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (<0.2 or ≥ 5.0 multiples of the median (MoM)) or pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A<0.2 MoM. One or more of these factors was present in 3% of women, and the prevalence of atypical abnormal karyotypes in this high-risk cohort was 1.6%.
Conclusions: A significant proportion of karyotypic abnormalities will be missed by targeted NIPT. Women of advanced maternal age, or with increased fetal NT or abnormal biochemistry, have a higher risk of having a fetus affected by an atypical abnormal karyotype and need to be counseled accordingly when considering NIPT.
Keywords: NIPT; chromosomal anomaly; free fetal DNA; prenatal diagnosis; prenatal screening.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Gadsbøll K, Vogel I, Kristensen SE, Pedersen LH, Hyett J, Petersen OB; Danish Cytogenetic Central Register study group. Gadsbøll K, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.27667. Epub 2024 Sep 4. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38642365
-
Karadzov-Orlić N, Egić A, Filimonović D, Marinković M, Damnjanović-Pazin B, Milovanović Z, Joksić I, Branković S, Lukić R, Mandić V, Cerović N, Mojović D, Plamenac S, Stanković M, Maglić D, Mikovć Z. Karadzov-Orlić N, et al. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2012 Sep-Oct;140(9-10):606-11. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2012. PMID: 23289277
-
Atypicality index as an add-on to combined first-trimester screening for chromosomal aberrations.
Gadsbøll K, Vogel I, Pedersen LH, Kristensen SE, Wright A, Wright D, Petersen OB. Gadsbøll K, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun;63(6):798-806. doi: 10.1002/uog.27562. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 38112514
-
Spencer K, Cowans NJ, Avgidou K, Nicolaides KH. Spencer K, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;28(5):637-43. doi: 10.1002/uog.3809. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 16952214 Review.
-
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects.
Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E. Benn P, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;42(1):15-33. doi: 10.1002/uog.12513. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23765643 Review.
Cited by
-
Sagi-Dain L, Singer A, Petersen OB, Lou S, Vogel I. Sagi-Dain L, et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;8:768997. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.768997. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34869484 Free PMC article.
-
Harasim T, Neuhann T, Behnecke A, Stampfer M, Holinski-Feder E, Abicht A. Harasim T, et al. J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 13;11(2):372. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020372. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35054066 Free PMC article.
-
Xu Y, Hu S, Chen L, Hao Y, Zhang H, Xu Z, Wu W, Deng L. Xu Y, et al. Mol Cytogenet. 2023 Oct 28;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13039-023-00661-1. Mol Cytogenet. 2023. PMID: 37898768 Free PMC article.
-
Have we done our last amniocentesis? Updates on cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening.
Gray KJ, Wilkins-Haug LE. Gray KJ, et al. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Apr;48(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3958-y. Epub 2018 Mar 17. Pediatr Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29550862 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lou S, Nielsen CP, Hvidman L, Petersen OB, Risør MB. Lou S, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1114-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27769247 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials