Ravens notice dominance reversals among conspecifics within and outside their social group - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2014
Ravens notice dominance reversals among conspecifics within and outside their social group
Jorg J M Massen et al. Nat Commun. 2014.
Free PMC article
Abstract
A core feature of social intelligence is the understanding of third-party relations, which has been experimentally demonstrated in primates. Whether other social animals also have this capacity, and whether they can use this capacity flexibly to, for example, also assess the relations of neighbouring conspecifics, remains unknown. Here we show that ravens react differently to playbacks of dominance interactions that either confirm or violate the current rank hierarchy of members in their own social group and of ravens in a neighbouring group. Therefore, ravens understand third-party relations and may deduce those not only via physical interactions but also by observation.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ab/3997804/4d4b4e4e18f1/ncomms4679-f1.gif)
Mean±s.e.m. difference between playback and baseline (delta: Δ) of (a) self-directed behaviour and (b) ‘Stress’ behaviour, for playbacks simulating expected (purple bars) and unexpected (orange bars) dominance interactions of in-group individuals. For clarity, we added 2 to these means. n=16, GLMM: *P<0.05, #0.05<P<0.10.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ab/3997804/effc5a25b734/ncomms4679-f2.gif)
Mean±s.e.m. difference between playback and baseline (Δ) self-directed behaviour of males (n=7) and females (n=9), for playbacks simulating expected (purple bars) and unexpected (orange bars) dominance interactions of in-group individuals. For clarity, we added 2 to these means. GLMM and post hoc Wilcoxon-signed ranks tests: *P<0.05.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ab/3997804/0148363d32a1/ncomms4679-f3.gif)
Mean±s.e.m. difference between playback and baseline (Δ) of activity, for playbacks simulating expected (purple bars) and unexpected (orange bars) dominance interactions of in-group individuals of the same sex and of individuals of the different sex. For clarity, we added 2 to these means. n=16, GLMM and post hoc Wilcoxon-signed ranks tests: *P<0.05; **P<0.01.
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ab/3997804/6b7e4092310a/ncomms4679-f4.gif)
Mean±s.e.m. difference between playback and baseline (Δ) of (a) vocalizations and (b) close interest behaviour of males (n=7) and females (n=9), for playbacks simulating expected (purple bars) and unexpected (orange bars) dominance interactions of in-group individuals. For clarity, we added 2 to these means. GLMM and post hoc Wilcoxon-signed ranks tests: *P<0.05, #0.05<P<0.10.
![Figure 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ab/3997804/971f084ece80/ncomms4679-f5.gif)
Aviaries A (18 × 10 × 5 m3), B (15 × 15 × 5 m3) and C (8 × 10 × 5 m3), housing group 1 (orange) and group 2 (yellow) during the different phases (a–c) of the experiment. The black dot represents an example of an animal in a test, the sound logo the place of the speaker from which the playback was played and the camera logo the respective place of the cameras that filmed this bird.
![Figure 6](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7ab/3997804/d1e4c26f4eae/ncomms4679-f6.gif)
Playback stimulus simulating an interaction between a dominant bird giving a bout of three SADs (individual I) followed by a bout of submissive vocalizations from a subordinate bird (individual II) and followed again by one SAD from the dominant.
Similar articles
-
Attacked ravens flexibly adjust signalling behaviour according to audience composition.
Szipl G, Ringler E, Bugnyar T. Szipl G, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 13;285(1880):20180375. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0375. Proc Biol Sci. 2018. PMID: 29875298 Free PMC article.
-
Scheid C, Range F, Bugnyar T. Scheid C, et al. J Comp Psychol. 2007 Nov;121(4):380-6. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.380. J Comp Psychol. 2007. PMID: 18085921
-
Stocker M, Munteanu A, Stöwe M, Schwab C, Palme R, Bugnyar T. Stocker M, et al. Horm Behav. 2016 Feb;78:194-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 26. Horm Behav. 2016. PMID: 26631484 Free PMC article.
-
Hobson EA. Hobson EA. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Jun;33:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 1. Curr Opin Psychol. 2020. PMID: 31627042 Review.
-
The mentality of crows: convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes.
Emery NJ, Clayton NS. Emery NJ, et al. Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1098410. Science. 2004. PMID: 15591194 Review.
Cited by
-
Krüppel-homologue 1 Mediates Hormonally Regulated Dominance Rank in a Social Bee.
Pandey A, Bloch G. Pandey A, et al. Biology (Basel). 2021 Nov 15;10(11):1188. doi: 10.3390/biology10111188. Biology (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34827180 Free PMC article.
-
Firth JA, Sheldon BC, Brent LJN. Firth JA, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Nov 29;284(1867):20171939. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1939. Proc Biol Sci. 2017. PMID: 29142116 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans.
Brecht KF, Wagener L, Ostojić L, Clayton NS, Nieder A. Brecht KF, et al. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017 Dec;203(12):1017-1027. doi: 10.1007/s00359-017-1211-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28905251 Free PMC article.
-
Wild acorn woodpeckers recognize associations between individuals in other groups.
Pardo MA, Sparks EA, Kuray TS, Hagemeyer ND, Walters EL, Koenig WD. Pardo MA, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jul 11;285(1882):20181017. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1017. Proc Biol Sci. 2018. PMID: 30051822 Free PMC article.
-
What constitutes "social complexity" and "social intelligence" in birds? Lessons from ravens.
Boucherie PH, Loretto MC, Massen JJM, Bugnyar T. Boucherie PH, et al. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019;73(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00265-018-2607-2. Epub 2019 Jan 19. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2019. PMID: 30930524 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Humphrey N. K. inGrowing Points in Ethology eds Bateson P. P. G., Hinde R. A. 303–317Cambridge Univ. Press (1976).
-
- Byrne R. W. & Whiten A. Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Complexity and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and Humans Oxford Univ. Press (1988).
-
- Dunbar R. I. M. The social brain hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 6, 178–190 (1998).
-
- Silk J. B., Alberts S. C. & Altmann J. Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival. Science 302, 1231–1234 (2003). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources