Molecular basis of substrate recognition and degradation by human presequence protease - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2014
Molecular basis of substrate recognition and degradation by human presequence protease
John V King et al. Structure. 2014.
Abstract
Human presequence protease (hPreP) is an M16 metalloprotease localized in mitochondria. There, hPreP facilitates proteostasis by utilizing an ∼13,300-Å(3) catalytic chamber to degrade a diverse array of potentially toxic peptides, including mitochondrial presequences and β-amyloid (Aβ), the latter of which contributes to Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Here, we report crystal structures for hPreP alone and in complex with Aβ, which show that hPreP uses size exclusion and charge complementation for substrate recognition. These structures also reveal hPreP-specific features that permit a diverse array of peptides, with distinct distributions of charged and hydrophobic residues, to be specifically captured, cleaved, and have their amyloidogenic features destroyed. SAXS analysis demonstrates that hPreP in solution exists in dynamic equilibrium between closed and open states, with the former being preferred. Furthermore, Aβ binding induces the closed state and hPreP dimerization. Together, these data reveal the molecular basis for flexible yet specific substrate recognition and degradation by hPreP.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures

(A) M16 metalloprotease domain organization. (B) Crystal structure of hPreP (C) Volumetric analysis of the hPreP catalytic chamber, performed with 3V (Voss and Gerstein, 2010). (D) Electrostatic surface representations of hPreP, atPreP (PDB: 2FGE) and Fln (PDB: 3S5H) catalytic chambers at ±6 kT/e, performed with APBS (Baker et al., 2001). Positive surfaces are blue, negative ones red, and neutral ones white. (E) Analysis of M16C catalytic chamber conservation, performed with ConSur (Ashkenazy et al., 2010). Positions are colored on a sliding scale from magenta (most conserved) to teal (degenerate). See also Figure S1 and S2.

(A) HPreP-N catalytic chamber. (B) Two pockets (L111, F123, F124, and L127; and H896 and R888) explain observed cleavage site preference for P1 or P′1 hydrophobic residues, and scissile bonds 2-5 residues distal from substrate C-termini. (C) Labeled acidic residues are proximal to the active site and can facilitate interaction with basic substrate residues (D) A network of hydrophobic resides in hPreP-N permits capture of hydrophobic residues.

(A) L557E and P558G sit in a conserved hydrophobic pocket on the D1 surface. The lower inset is colored by electrostatic surface; the upper one, by conservation. (B) Specific activities of hPreP WT and mutants at an enzyme concentration of 1.25 nM. Activity was determined by monitoring the cleavage of 0.5μM Substrate V at 37 °C. (C) WT and mutant hPreP specific activities at indicated Substrate V concentrations. Datasets were fit to the Michaelis-Menten equation, with Vmax (98, 29, 43 s−1) and Km (26, 82, 26 μM), calculated for WT, L557E, and P558G, respectively. Mean ± SD represents at least 3 experiments. See also Figure S3.

(A) MALDI-ToF/ToF and (B) deconvoluted Q-ToF mass spectra of Aβ40 alone (lower panel) and hPreP-degraded Aβ40 (upper panels). Aβ40 and hPreP were mixed at the indicated molar ratios (1:100-1000). (C) Schematic of hPreP's Aβ40 cleavage sites. Filled arrows denote sites identified by (Falkevall et al., 2006), while dashed arrows indicate cleavage sites identified in this study. Asterisks mark cleavage sites reported by (Chow et al., 2009). See also Figure S4.

(A) Aβ-binding to hPreP-N. (B) Hydrophobic exosite. Four Aβ residues (x1, y1-3) are observed. Hydrophobic residues that comprise the putative side chain binding pockets are displayed in gray. (C) Aβ-binding to the hPreP catalytic cleft. The S1 site consists of L111, F123, F124, and R900. (D-E) 2Fo-Fc electron density maps contoured at 0.5σ for Aβ residues bound to (D) the catalytic cleft and (E) the hydrophobic exosite. Arrows denote preferred Aβ cleavage sites by hPreP. See also Figure S5.

Pair distribution functions and scattering curves for WT (A and B), E107Q (C and D), and E107Q + Aβ (E and F). Curve fitting was performed based on atomic models input to CRYSOL (single models) and OLIGOMER (multiple models). The volume fractions shown below the profiles indicate the percent composition by conformational state in solution that yielded the line of best fit for the observed data (mixture). See also Figure S6.
Similar articles
-
Degradation of the amyloid beta-protein by the novel mitochondrial peptidasome, PreP.
Falkevall A, Alikhani N, Bhushan S, Pavlov PF, Busch K, Johnson KA, Eneqvist T, Tjernberg L, Ankarcrona M, Glaser E. Falkevall A, et al. J Biol Chem. 2006 Sep 29;281(39):29096-104. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602532200. Epub 2006 Jul 18. J Biol Chem. 2006. PMID: 16849325
-
In vitro oxidative inactivation of human presequence protease (hPreP).
Teixeira PF, Pinho CM, Branca RM, Lehtiö J, Levine RL, Glaser E. Teixeira PF, et al. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012 Dec 1;53(11):2188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.09.039. Epub 2012 Oct 3. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012. PMID: 23041349 Free PMC article.
-
Alikhani N, Berglund AK, Engmann T, Spånning E, Vögtle FN, Pavlov P, Meisinger C, Langer T, Glaser E. Alikhani N, et al. J Mol Biol. 2011 Jul 15;410(3):400-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 May 23. J Mol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21621546
-
Alikhani N, Ankarcrona M, Glaser E. Alikhani N, et al. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2009 Oct;41(5):447-51. doi: 10.1007/s10863-009-9244-4. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2009. PMID: 19798557 Review.
-
The organellar peptidasome, PreP: a journey from Arabidopsis to Alzheimer's disease.
Glaser E, Alikhani N. Glaser E, et al. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jun-Jul;1797(6-7):1076-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.12.016. Epub 2009 Dec 28. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010. PMID: 20036633 Review.
Cited by
-
Smith-Carpenter JE, Alper BJ. Smith-Carpenter JE, et al. Protein Sci. 2018 Apr;27(4):861-873. doi: 10.1002/pro.3380. Epub 2018 Feb 23. Protein Sci. 2018. PMID: 29383861 Free PMC article.
-
Protease-associated import systems are widespread in Gram-negative bacteria.
Grinter R, Leung PM, Wijeyewickrema LC, Littler D, Beckham S, Pike RN, Walker D, Greening C, Lithgow T. Grinter R, et al. PLoS Genet. 2019 Oct 15;15(10):e1008435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008435. eCollection 2019 Oct. PLoS Genet. 2019. PMID: 31613892 Free PMC article.
-
Targeting Insulin-Degrading Enzyme to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Tang WJ. Tang WJ. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;27(1):24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2015.11.003. Epub 2015 Dec 2. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016. PMID: 26651592 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bacterial iron acquisition mediated by outer membrane translocation and cleavage of a host protein.
Mosbahi K, Wojnowska M, Albalat A, Walker D. Mosbahi K, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 26;115(26):6840-6845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800672115. Epub 2018 Jun 11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018. PMID: 29891657 Free PMC article.
-
A cryptic third active site in cyanophycin synthetase creates primers for polymerization.
Sharon I, Pinus S, Grogg M, Moitessier N, Hilvert D, Schmeing TM. Sharon I, et al. Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 7;13(1):3923. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31542-7. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 35798723 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alikhani N, Berglund AK, Engmann T, Spanning E, Vogtle FN, Pavlov P, Meisinger C, Langer T, Glaser E. Targeting capacity and conservation of PreP homologues localization in mitochondria of different species. J Mol Biol. 2011a;410:400–410. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous