The conserved GTPase LepA contributes mainly to translation initiation in Escherichia coli - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2014
The conserved GTPase LepA contributes mainly to translation initiation in Escherichia coli
Rohan Balakrishnan et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014.
Abstract
LepA is a paralog of EF-G found in all bacteria. Deletion of lepA confers no obvious growth defect in Escherichia coli, and the physiological role of LepA remains unknown. Here, we identify nine strains (ΔdksA, ΔmolR1, ΔrsgA, ΔtatB, ΔtonB, ΔtolR, ΔubiF, ΔubiG or ΔubiH) in which ΔlepA confers a synthetic growth phenotype. These strains are compromised for gene regulation, ribosome assembly, transport and/or respiration, indicating that LepA contributes to these functions in some way. We also use ribosome profiling to deduce the effects of LepA on translation. We find that loss of LepA alters the average ribosome density (ARD) for hundreds of mRNA coding regions in the cell, substantially reducing ARD in many cases. By contrast, only subtle and codon-specific changes in ribosome distribution along mRNA are seen. These data suggest that LepA contributes mainly to the initiation phase of translation. Consistent with this interpretation, the effect of LepA on ARD is related to the sequence of the Shine-Dalgarno region. Global perturbation of gene expression in the ΔlepA mutant likely explains most of its phenotypes.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.
Figures

Examples of genes that exhibit decreased ARD in the absence of LepA. Total-RNA and ribosome-footprint read counts for WT, mutant (M) and complemented (C) strains are shown mapped back to the genome in the vicinity of ychH (A), raiA (B), lldP (C), dctA (D) and aldA (E). Ribosome-footprint reads are mapped to the genomic position corresponding to the predicted central nt of the P codon, and total-RNA reads are mapped to the center of the read fragment. Read counts are normalized with respect to total number of reads (after quality control and rRNA read removal), making the histograms of analogous data tracks directly comparable in each panel.

Gene expression is globally perturbed in the absence of LepA. Normalized gene-by-gene coverages are compared between ribosome footprints and total RNA in WT, mutant and complemented strains (as indicated). A measure of spread, , was calculated for each of the comparisons, yielding 0.62 ± 0.02, 1.12 ± 0.02 and 0.88 ± 0.03 for the WT, M and C samples, respectively. Student's t-tests on the values of
in all three replicates yield P = 1.6 × 10−5 for the WT versus M, and P = 1.2 × 10−3 for the M versus C comparison, showing significant perturbation of translation efficiencies (i.e. changes in ARD values) due to loss of LepA.

Loss of LepA results in fewer polysomes and more free subunits. Representative A254 traces of sucrose gradient profiles of wild-type (A), ΔlepA (B) and ΔlepA(pLEPA) (C) strains, with peaks corresponding to 30S and 50S subunits, 70S monosomes and polysomes (as indicated). The percentage of polysomes, 70S monosomes, and subunits (30S plus 50S) are graphed below (mean ± SEM). Differences deemed significant are seen for polysome levels (WT versus M, P = 2.4 × 10−2; C versus M, P = 1.9 × 10−2) and subunit levels (WT versus M, P = 2.6 × 10−2), based on Student's t-test.

Effects of LepA on ARD are related to the TIR sequence. Nt frequencies at each position of the TIR were determined for the subset of genes with decreased ARD in the absence of LepA (WT, C > M; 237 genes), the subset of genes with increased ARD in absence of LepA (WT, C < M; 283 genes) and all genes analyzed (1870). Purine and pyrimidine frequencies for each subset, relative to those of the complete set, are plotted as a function of TIR position (as indicated; position zero corresponds to the first nt of the start codon). Binomial tests indicate that pyrimidines are significantly underrepresented in the former subset (WT, C > M) at positions −11 (P = 7.4 × 10−4), −10 (P = 2.9 × 10−3) and −9 (P = 1.6 × 10−3) and significantly overrepresented in the latter subset (WT, C < M) at positions −11 (P = 3.3 × 10−2), −10 (P = 3.7 × 10−4), −9 (P = 2.5 × 10−2) and −8 (P = 2.6 × 10−2), data points marked with asterisks. The differences seen at the first position of the start codon (position zero) are deemed less than statistically significant (only 40 of the 1870 analyzed genes begin with a pyrimidine). Genes infC and pcnB have the rare start codon AUU and hence were omitted from the analysis. The second and third nts of the start codon (UG) are otherwise invariant and assigned the value of 1.0.

LepA prevents ribosomal pausing at certain GGU codons. Aligned are the coding sequences corresponding to the predicted paused ribosomes seen specifically in the mutant strain. The left column identifies the gene and the codon number (of the P codon of the paused complex). Codon GGU (red) is significantly overrepresented as the A codon (P = 7.4 × 10−13), based on a two-tailed binomial test. GGC (blue), the other codon recognized by Gly-tRNAGly3, is seen to occupy the A site in two cases, which is deemed less-than-significant enrichment.
Similar articles
-
Gibbs MR, Moon KM, Chen M, Balakrishnan R, Foster LJ, Fredrick K. Gibbs MR, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):980-985. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613665114. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017. PMID: 28096346 Free PMC article.
-
Shoji S, Janssen BD, Hayes CS, Fredrick K. Shoji S, et al. Biochimie. 2010 Feb;92(2):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Nov 17. Biochimie. 2010. PMID: 19925844 Free PMC article.
-
Carlson MA, Haddad BG, Weis AJ, Blackwood CS, Shelton CD, Wuerth ME, Walter JD, Spiegel PC Jr. Carlson MA, et al. FEBS J. 2017 Jun;284(11):1631-1643. doi: 10.1111/febs.14067. Epub 2017 Apr 10. FEBS J. 2017. PMID: 28342293 Free PMC article.
-
Gibbs MR, Fredrick K. Gibbs MR, et al. Mol Microbiol. 2018 Feb;107(4):445-454. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13895. Epub 2017 Dec 29. Mol Microbiol. 2018. PMID: 29235176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Taking a Step Back from Back-Translocation: an Integrative View of LepA/EF4's Cellular Function.
Heller JLE, Kamalampeta R, Wieden HJ. Heller JLE, et al. Mol Cell Biol. 2017 May 31;37(12):e00653-16. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00653-16. Print 2017 Jun 15. Mol Cell Biol. 2017. PMID: 28320876 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Ero R, Kumar V, Chen Y, Gao YG. Ero R, et al. RNA Biol. 2016 Dec;13(12):1258-1273. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1201627. Epub 2016 Jun 20. RNA Biol. 2016. PMID: 27325008 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Omnipresent Maxwell's demons orchestrate information management in living cells.
Boël G, Danot O, de Lorenzo V, Danchin A. Boël G, et al. Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;12(2):210-242. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13378. Microb Biotechnol. 2019. PMID: 30806035 Free PMC article.
-
Structure of the GTP Form of Elongation Factor 4 (EF4) Bound to the Ribosome.
Kumar V, Ero R, Ahmed T, Goh KJ, Zhan Y, Bhushan S, Gao YG. Kumar V, et al. J Biol Chem. 2016 Jun 17;291(25):12943-50. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.725945. Epub 2016 May 2. J Biol Chem. 2016. PMID: 27137929 Free PMC article.
-
Mohammad F, Green R, Buskirk AR. Mohammad F, et al. Elife. 2019 Feb 6;8:e42591. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42591. Elife. 2019. PMID: 30724162 Free PMC article.
-
Translational regulation of environmental adaptation in bacteria.
Tollerson R 2nd, Ibba M. Tollerson R 2nd, et al. J Biol Chem. 2020 Jul 24;295(30):10434-10445. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.012742. Epub 2020 Jun 9. J Biol Chem. 2020. PMID: 32518156 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Caldon C.E., March P.E. Function of the universally conserved bacterial GTPases. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003;6:135–139. - PubMed
-
- Caldon C.E., Yoong P., March P.E. Evolution of a molecular switch: universal bacterial GTPases regulate ribosome function. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;41:289–297. - PubMed
-
- March P.E., Inouye M. Characterization of the lep operon of Escherichia coli. Identification of the promoter and the gene upstream of the signal peptidase I gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:7206–7213. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases