pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Identification of Coq11, a new coenzyme Q biosynthetic protein in the CoQ-synthome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae - PubMed

  • ️Thu Jan 01 2015

Identification of Coq11, a new coenzyme Q biosynthetic protein in the CoQ-synthome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Christopher M Allan et al. J Biol Chem. 2015.

Abstract

Coenzyme Q (Q or ubiquinone) is a redox active lipid composed of a fully substituted benzoquinone ring and a polyisoprenoid tail and is required for mitochondrial electron transport. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Q is synthesized by the products of 11 known genes, COQ1-COQ9, YAH1, and ARH1. The function of some of the Coq proteins remains unknown, and several steps in the Q biosynthetic pathway are not fully characterized. Several of the Coq proteins are associated in a macromolecular complex on the matrix face of the inner mitochondrial membrane, and this complex is required for efficient Q synthesis. Here, we further characterize this complex via immunoblotting and proteomic analysis of tandem affinity-purified tagged Coq proteins. We show that Coq8, a putative kinase required for the stability of the Q biosynthetic complex, is associated with a Coq6-containing complex. Additionally Q6 and late stage Q biosynthetic intermediates were also found to co-purify with the complex. A mitochondrial protein of unknown function, encoded by the YLR290C open reading frame, is also identified as a constituent of the complex and is shown to be required for efficient de novo Q biosynthesis. Given its effect on Q synthesis and its association with the biosynthetic complex, we propose that the open reading frame YLR290C be designated COQ11.

Keywords: Coenzyme Q; Immunoprecipitation; Mass Spectrometry (MS); Mitochondrial Metabolism; Protein Complex; Proteomics; Q Biosynthetic Intermediates; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Ubiquinone; Yeast.

© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

Proposed coenzyme Q biosynthetic pathway in S. cerevisiae. Yeast utilize either 4HB or pABA to synthesize the first lipid intermediates of the pathway, HHB or HAB, respectively, through the actions of Coq1 and Coq2. These intermediates then undergo a series of ring modifications catalyzed by the enzymes denoted above each step to yield Q. Two steps in the pathway, denoted with question marks, remain uncharacterized. The step at which the amino group is converted to the hydroxyl group remains unclear and is denoted by dashed arrows. Two late stage intermediates, DMQ6 and IDMQ6, are readily detected in yeast. The hexaprenyl moiety is abbreviated as R.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

Expression of CNAP-tagged Coq3, Coq6, or Coq9 proteins preserves growth on a nonfermentable carbon source and de novo Q biosynthesis. A, designated yeast strains were grown overnight in 5 ml of YPD, diluted to an A600 of 0.2 with sterile PBS, and 2 μl of 5-fold serial dilutions were spotted onto each type of plate medium, corresponding to a final A600 of 0.2, 0.04, 0.008, 0.0016, and 0.00032. Plates were incubated at 30 °C, and growth is depicted after 2 days for both YPD and SD−His and 3 days for YPG. B and C, total 13C6-Q6 (13C6-Q6 + 13C6-Q6H2) (B) and total 12C-Q6 (12C-Q6 + 12C-Q6H2) (C) were measured in the designated yeast strains by HPLC-MS/MS. Yeast strains were grown overnight in 5 ml of SD-complete diluted to an A600 of 0.05 in 50 ml of DOD-complete, labeled with either 13C6-4HB or 13C6-pABA at an A600 of 0.5, and harvested after 3 h of labeling. Lipid measurements were normalized by the wet weight of extracted cells. Each bar represents the mean of four measurements from two biological samples with two injections each. Error bars represent standard deviations. Statistical significance was determined with the two-tailed Student's t test, and the lowercase letters above the bars are indicative of statistical significance. In B, the content of total 13C6-Q6 in CNAP3, CNAP6, CNAP9, and coq8Δ was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor; 13C6-Q6 synthesized from 13C6-pABA in CNAP6 was 120% of wild type, whereas 13C6-Q6 synthesized from 13C6-4HB in CNAP9 was 70% of wild type (a, p = 0.0052; b, p = 0.0018). In C, the content of total 12C-Q6 in CNAP3, CNAP6, CNAP9, and coq8Δ was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor; accumulated 12C-Q6 in CNAP6 was 80% of wild type under 13C6-4HB labeling, 120% in CNAP6 under 13C6-pABA labeling compared with wild type, and 80% of wild type in CNAP9 labeled with 13C6-4HB (a, p = 0.0423; b, p = 0.0179; c, p = 0.0224). ND, not detected.

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.

CNAP-tagged Coq proteins co-precipitate several other Coq proteins. W303, CNAP3, CNAP6, and CNAP9 purified mitochondria (15 mg of protein) were solubilized with digitonin and subjected to tandem affinity purification with Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen) followed by anti-PC-agarose (Roche). Samples were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels followed by transfer to PVDF membranes for immunoblotting with antisera to the designated yeast polypeptides. 25 μg of mitochondria protein were analyzed for each strain (M), and 2.5% of the first anti-PC elution (E1) volume was loaded per strain (25 μl). Arrows denote each tagged protein in their respective blots. The predominant band in the Coq3 blot detected in the mitochondrial samples represents a background protein and not Coq3, accounting for its presence in CNAP3 mitochondria.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Tandem affinity-purified Coq complexes co-purify with Q6 and late-stage Q6 intermediates. For each strain, aliquots of the anti-PC eluates (29% of E1 and 29% of E2) were combined and subjected to lipid extraction with methanol and petroleum ether. Lipid extracts were analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS for Q6 (A), DMQ6 (C), and IDMQ6 (E). Measured lipids were normalized by the extracted eluate volume. Bars represent the means of two measurements, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined with the two-tailed Student's t test, and the lowercase letters above the bars are indicative of statistical significance. In A, the content of Q6 in CNAP3, CNAP6, and CNAP9 was 11.7-, 8.6-, and 22.6-fold higher, respectively, compared with wild type (a, p = 0.0001; b, p = 0.0040; c, p = 0.0006). In C, the content of DMQ6 in CNAP3, CNAP6, and CNAP9 was 30-, 24-, and 97-fold higher, respectively, compared with wild type (a, p = 0.0110; b, p = 0.0113; c, p = 0.0010). In E, there was no detectable IDMQ6 in the wild type. ND, not detected. Representative overlaid traces of all four strains (W303, purple; CNAP3, green; CNAP6, red; CNAP9, blue) are shown for Q6 (B), DMQ6 (D), and IDMQ6 (F).

FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.

SYPRO Ruby staining for total protein reveals unique bands in CNAP tagged eluates. For each strain designated, aliquots of the anti-PC eluates (20% of E1 and 20% of anti-PC eluate two (E2)) were combined and dried with a SpeedVac at 60 °C for 2 h. Samples were resuspended in 42 μl of SDS sample buffer and separated with an 8–16% Criterion SDS-PAGE gel (Bio-Rad). Following separation proteins were fixed, and the gel was stained overnight with a 1:1 mixture of fresh and used SYPRO Ruby (Life Technologies). The gel was subsequently washed and visualized with an FX Pro Plus Molecular Imager (Bio-Rad) at 532-nm excitation, and emission was measured with a 555-nm long pass filter. The ladder denotes protein masses in kDa.

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.

Yeast ilv6Δ and ylr290cΔ mutants retain the ability to grow on a nonfermentable carbon source. Designated yeast strains were grown overnight in 5 ml of YPD and diluted to an A600 of 0.2 with sterile PBS, and 2 μl of 5-fold serial dilutions were spotted onto each type of plate medium, corresponding to a final A600 of 0.2, 0.04, 0.008, 0.0016, and 0.00032. Plates were incubated at 30 °C, and growth is depicted after 2 days for YPD and 3 days for YPG.

FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.

The yeast ylr290cΔ mutant, but not the ilv6Δ mutant, shows impaired de novo Q biosynthesis. 13C6-HAB (A), 12C-HAB (B), 13C6-HHB (C), 12C-HHB (D), 13C6-DMQ6 (E), 12C-DMQ6 (F), total 13C6-Q6 (13C6-Q6 + 13C6-Q6H2) (G), and total 12C-Q6 (12C-Q6 + 12C-Q6H2) (H) were measured in the designated yeast strains by HPLC-MS/MS. Yeast strains were grown overnight in 5 ml of SD-complete, diluted to an A600 of 0.05 in 50 ml of DOD-complete, labeled with either 13C6-4HB or 13C6-pABA at an A600 of 0.5, and harvested after 3 h of labeling. Lipid measurements were normalized by the wet weight of extracted cells. Each bar represents the mean of four measurements from two biological samples with two injections each. Error bars represent standard deviations. Statistical significance was determined with the two-tailed Student's t test, and the lowercase letters above the bars are indicative of statistical significance. In A, the relative content of 13C6-HAB in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor (a, p = 0.0017; b, p < 0.0001; c, p = 0.0014). In B, the relative content of 12C-HAB in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor (a, p < 0.0001; b, p = 0.0003; c, p = 0.0014; d, p = 0.0002). In C, the relative content of 13C6-HHB in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor (a, p = 0.0001; b, p = 0.0003; c, p = 0.0005). In D, the relative content of 12C-HHB in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor (a, p = 0.0002; b, p = 0.0004; c, p = 0.0047; d, p < 0.0001). In E, the relative content of 13C6-DMQ6 in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor (a, p = 0.0441; b, p < 0.0001). ND, not detected. In F, the relative content of 12C-DMQ6 in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor (a, p = 0.0453; b, p = 0.0002; c, p = 0.0003). ND, not detected. In G, the content of 13C6-Q6 in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor; the ilv6Δ mutant produced 60% 13C6-Q6 compared with wild type when labeled with 13C6-4HB, and the ylr290cΔ mutant produced 6.1 and 4.5% 13C6-Q6 compared with wild type when labeled with 13C6-4HB or 13C6-pABA, respectively (a, p = 0.0017; b, p < 0.0001). ND, not detected. In H, the content of 12C-Q6 in the three null mutants was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor; the ylr290cΔ mutant accumulated 17.5 and 21.8% 12C-Q6 compared with wild type when labeled with 13C6-4HB or 13C6-pABA respectively (a, p < 0.0001). ND, not detected.

FIGURE 8.
FIGURE 8.

Expression of CNAP-tagged YLR290C preserves de novo Q biosynthesis. Levels of total 13C6-Q6 (13C6-Q6 + 13C6-Q6H2) (A) and total 12C-Q6 (12C-Q6 + 12C-Q6H2) (B) were measured in the designated yeast strains by HPLC-MS/MS. Yeast strains were grown overnight in 5 ml of SD-complete, diluted to an A600 of 0.05 in 50 ml of DOD-complete, labeled with either 13C6-4HB or 13C6-pABA at an A600 of 0.5, and harvested after 3 h of labeling. Lipid measurements were normalized by the wet weight of extracted cells. Each bar represents the mean of four measurements from two biological samples with two injections each. Error bars represent standard deviations. Statistical significance was determined with the two-tailed Student's t test, and the lowercase letters above the bars are indicative of statistical significance. In A, the content of 13C6-Q6 in CA-1 and coq8Δ was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor; 13C6-Q6 synthesized by CA-1 was 70% of wild type and 80% of wild type with 13C6-4HB and 13C6-pABA, respectively (a, p = 0.0005; b, p = 0.0196). ND, not detected. In B, the content of 12C-Q6 in CA-1 and coq8Δ was compared with wild type with the corresponding 13C6-labeled precursor; accumulated 12C-Q6 in CA-1 was 70% of wild type when labeled with either 13C6-4HB or 13C6-pABA (a, p = 0.0202; b, p = 0.0001). ND, not detected.

FIGURE 9.
FIGURE 9.

Coq4, Coq5, and Coq7 co-precipitate with YLR290C-CNAP. Purified mitochondria from W303 and CA-1 (15 mg of protein) were solubilized with digitonin and subjected to tandem affinity purification using Ni-NTA resin (Qiagen) followed by anti-PC-agarose (Roche). Samples were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels followed by transfer to PVDF membranes for immunoblotting. Mitochondria (25 μg of protein) (M) and 2.5% of the first anti-PC elution (E1) were analyzed for each of the two strains.

FIGURE 10.
FIGURE 10.

Tandem affinity-purified YLR290C-CNAP co-purifies with Q and late-stage Q intermediates. For each strain, aliquots of the anti-PC eluates (29% of E1 and 29% of E2) were combined and subjected to lipid extraction with methanol and petroleum ether. Lipid extracts were analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS for total Q6 (Q6 + Q6H2) (A), DMQ6 (C), and IDMQ6 (E). Measured lipids were normalized by the extracted eluate volume. The bars represent the mean of two measurements, and the error bars represent the standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined with the two-tailed Student's t test, and the lowercase letters above the bars are indicative of statistical significance. In A, the content of Q6 in CA-1 was 5.4-fold higher compared with wild type (a, p = 0.0418). In C, the content of DMQ6 in CA-1 was 6.7-fold higher compared with wild type (a, p = 0.0025). In E, there was no detectable IDMQ6 in the wild type. ND, not detected. Representative overlaid traces of both strains (W303, magenta; CA-1, green) are shown for Q6 (B), DMQ6 (D), and IDMQ6 (F).

FIGURE 11.
FIGURE 11.

Sequence analysis of YLR290C and related proteins. In A, YLR290C resides in a protein cluster populated by homologous fungal sequences including proteins that are fused to Coq10. Plant-like homologs form a distinct cluster composed of proteins from photosynthetic organisms. Prokaryotic sequences form a third independent cluster. The closest identified SDR subfamily distinct from YLR290C-like proteins includes human NDUFA9, a subunit of complex I, and orthologs in animals, fungi, and plants. In B, sequences representing each cluster from the protein similarity network in A were used to build a neighbor-joining tree. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units (amino acid substitutions per site) as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. A branch length scale bar is shown below. A number after an organism name signifies the presence of multiple homologs in the tree. Protein identifications can be found in the

supplemental Data Set 1

. A schematic of the YLR290C-Coq10 fusion found in U. maydis is shown in C.

FIGURE 12.
FIGURE 12.

Amino acid alignment of selected fungal YLR290C fusion proteins with YLR290C and Coq10 from S. cerevisiae. The N-terminal YLR290C-like portion is highlighted in yellow, and the Coq10 portion near the C terminus is highlighted in blue. The poorly conserved N-terminal sequence found in P. antarctica (res 1–100) is not shown. The numbering at the top of the alignment corresponds to the P. antarctica sequence. Pan, P. antarctica; Sre, S. reilianum; Pfl, P. flocculosa; Mpe, M. pennsylvanicum; Uma, U. maydis.

FIGURE 13.
FIGURE 13.

Model of the Q biosynthetic complex. The organization of the complex is based on co-precipitation experiments performed in previous work (21) and this study, as well as two-dimensional blue native-PAGE analysis (28). Coq1, Coq2, and Coq10 have not been shown to associate with the complex. Coq10 binds Q and particular Q intermediates and is postulated to function as a Q chaperone for efficient respiration and de novo Q biosynthesis (56). Coq8 is required for the phosphorylation of Coq3, Coq5, and Coq7 (19), and co-precipitation of CNAP-tagged Coq6 demonstrates their physical association. Co-precipitation of tagged YLR290C, here designated Coq11, showed its association with Coq4, Coq5, and Coq7. The number of copies of each Coq polypeptide depicted in the CoQ-synthome is hypothetical because the stoichiometry has not been determined. Lipid analysis of co-precipitation eluates demonstrated the association of Q6 and the late stage intermediates DMQ6 and IDMQ6 with the complex, illustrated as small molecules in association with Coq4.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Crane F. L. (1965) Distribution of ubiquinones. In Biochemistry of Quinones (Morton R. A., ed) pp. 183–206, Academic Press, London
    1. Brandt U., Trumpower B. (1994) The protonmotive Q cycle in mitochondria and bacteria. Crit Rev Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29, 165–197 - PubMed
    1. Grandier-Vazeille X., Bathany K., Chaignepain S., Camougrand N., Manon S., Schmitter J. M. (2001) Yeast mitochondrial dehydrogenases are associated in a supramolecular complex. Biochemistry 40, 9758–9769 - PubMed
    1. Lenaz G., De Santis A. (1985) A survey of the function and specificity of ubiquione in the mitochondrial respiratory chain. In Coenzyme Q (Lenaz G., ed) pp. 165–199, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
    1. Hildebrandt T. M., Grieshaber M. K. (2008) Three enzymatic activities catalyze the oxidation of sulfide to thiosulfate in mammalian and invertebrate mitochondria. FEBS J. 275, 3352–3361 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances