Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant - PubMed

Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant

Ziad M Hafed et al. Vision Res. 2016 Jan.

Free article

Abstract

Electronic implants are able to restore some visual function in blind patients with hereditary retinal degenerations. Subretinal visual implants, such as the CE-approved Retina Implant Alpha IMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), sense light through the eye's optics and subsequently stimulate retinal bipolar cells via ∼1500 independent pixels to project visual signals to the brain. Because these devices are directly implanted beneath the fovea, they potentially harness the full benefit of eye movements to scan scenes and fixate objects. However, so far, the oculomotor behavior of patients using subretinal implants has not been characterized. Here, we tracked eye movements in two blind patients seeing with a subretinal implant, and we compared them to those of three healthy controls. We presented bright geometric shapes on a dark background, and we asked the patients to report seeing them or not. We found that once the patients visually localized the shapes, they fixated well and exhibited classic oculomotor fixational patterns, including the generation of microsaccades and ocular drifts. Further, we found that a reduced frequency of saccades and microsaccades was correlated with loss of visibility. Last, but not least, gaze location corresponded to the location of the stimulus, and shape and size aspects of the viewed stimulus were reflected by the direction and size of saccades. Our results pave the way for future use of eye tracking in subretinal implant patients, not only to understand their oculomotor behavior, but also to design oculomotor training strategies that can help improve their quality of life.

Keywords: Fixational eye movements; Gaze fixation; Microsaccades; Retina Implant Alpha IMS; Retinitis pigmentosa; Subretinal electronic implant.

Similar articles

• Transfer characteristics of subretinal visual implants: corneally recorded implant responses.

  Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Braun A, Gekeler F, Greppmaier U, Schatz A, Stett A, Strasser T, Kitiratschky V, Zrenner E. Stingl K, et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;133(2):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s10633-016-9557-7. Epub 2016 Aug 10. Doc Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27510912 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

• Functional outcome in subretinal electronic implants depends on foveal eccentricity.

  Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Gekeler F, Kusnyerik A, Sachs H, Zrenner E. Stingl K, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 19;54(12):7658-65. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12835. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013. PMID: 24150759 Clinical Trial.

• Subretinal Visual Implant Alpha IMS--Clinical trial interim report.

  Stingl K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Besch D, Chee CK, Cottriall CL, Gekeler F, Groppe M, Jackson TL, MacLaren RE, Koitschev A, Kusnyerik A, Neffendorf J, Nemeth J, Naeem MA, Peters T, Ramsden JD, Sachs H, Simpson A, Singh MS, Wilhelm B, Wong D, Zrenner E. Stingl K, et al. Vision Res. 2015 Jun;111(Pt B):149-60. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Mar 23. Vision Res. 2015. PMID: 25812924 Clinical Trial.

• Control and Functions of Fixational Eye Movements.

  Rucci M, Poletti M. Rucci M, et al. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;1:499-518. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035742. Epub 2015 Oct 14. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2015. PMID: 27795997 Free PMC article. Review.

• [The Subretinal Implant - Clinical Results].

  Sachs HG. Sachs HG. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016 Nov;233(11):1233-1237. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-118460. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016. PMID: 27855447 Review. German.

Cited by

• Full gaze contingency provides better reading performance than head steering alone in a simulation of prosthetic vision.

  Paraskevoudi N, Pezaris JS. Paraskevoudi N, et al. Sci Rep. 2021 May 27;11(1):11121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86996-4. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34045485 Free PMC article.

• Restoring Sight with Retinal Prostheses.

  Palanker D, Goetz G. Palanker D, et al. Phys Today. 2018 Jul;71(7):26-32. doi: 10.1063/PT.3.3970. Phys Today. 2018. PMID: 31885403 Free PMC article.

• Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

  Goetz G, Smith R, Lei X, Galambos L, Kamins T, Mathieson K, Sher A, Palanker D. Goetz G, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Nov;56(12):7186-94. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17566. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015. PMID: 26540657 Free PMC article.

• Spatiotemporal Pixelization to Increase the Recognition Score of Characters for Retinal Prostheses.

  Kim HS, Park KS. Kim HS, et al. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Oct 24;17(10):2439. doi: 10.3390/s17102439. Sensors (Basel). 2017. PMID: 29073735 Free PMC article.

• Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses.

  van der Grinten M, de Ruyter van Steveninck J, Lozano A, Pijnacker L, Rueckauer B, Roelfsema P, van Gerven M, van Wezel R, Güçlü U, Güçlütürk Y. van der Grinten M, et al. Elife. 2024 Feb 22;13:e85812. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85812. Elife. 2024. PMID: 38386406 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Elsevier Science
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.

• Other Literature Sources

  • scite Smart Citations