pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Updating in working memory predicts greater emotion reactivity to and facilitated recovery from negative emotion-eliciting stimuli - PubMed

  • ️Thu Jan 01 2015

Updating in working memory predicts greater emotion reactivity to and facilitated recovery from negative emotion-eliciting stimuli

Madeline L Pe et al. Front Psychol. 2015.

Abstract

That emotions change in response to emotion-eliciting events is a natural part of human life. However, it is equally important for emotions to return to baseline once the emotion-eliciting events have passed. This suggests that the ability to emotionally react to and recover from emotion-eliciting events is critical for healthy psychological functioning. But why do individuals differ in their emotion reactivity and recovery? The present work postulates that the ability to update emotional information in working memory (WM) may explain individual differences in emotion reactivity and recovery. Two studies are presented, which examined whether updating ability was related to emotion reactivity and recovery. In Study 1, we assessed participants' self-reported affect as they viewed negative and positive films. Our results revealed that better updating ability was related to greater emotion reactivity and facilitated (i.e., quicker) recovery from watching negative films. In Study 2, participants recalled a recent angering event, and were then instructed to either ruminate about or reappraise the event. Results revealed that updating ability was again related to greater emotion reactivity and facilitated (i.e., successful) emotion recovery in response to the angering event, and that this was unrelated to the emotion regulation strategy used. These findings identify the ability to update emotional information in WM as a possible mechanism in emotion responding.

Keywords: emotion reactivity; emotion recovery; emotion responding; updating; working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Negative emotions in Study 1 during the different phases of the negative film-clip task. Low and high updating represent participants who scored 2SD below and above the sample average emotional updating ability, respectively.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Anger and positive emotions in Study 2 during the different phases of the anger recall task. Low and high updating represent participants who scored 2SD below and above the sample average emotional updating ability, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aldao A., Nolen-Hoeksema S., Schweizer S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 30, 217–237. 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Block J., Kremen A. M. (1996). IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 349–361. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.349 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradley M. M., Lang P. J. (1999). Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
    1. Bylsma L. M., Morris B. H., Rottenberg J. (2008). A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 28, 676–691. 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bylsma L. M., Taylor-Clift A., Rottenberg J. (2011). Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 120, 155–167. 10.1037/a0021662 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources