Toward a harmonized approach for environmental assessment of human activities in the marine environment - PubMed
Review
Toward a harmonized approach for environmental assessment of human activities in the marine environment
Jacqueline E Tamis et al. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Oct.
Abstract
With a foreseen increase in maritime activities, and driven by new policies and conventions aiming at sustainable management of the marine ecosystem, spatial management at sea is of growing importance. Spatial management should ensure that the collective pressures caused by anthropogenic activities on the marine ecosystem are kept within acceptable levels. A multitude of approaches to environmental assessment are available to provide insight for sustainable management, and there is a need for a harmonized and integrated environmental assessment approach that can be used for different purposes and variable levels of detail. This article first provides an overview of the main types of environmental assessments: "environmental impact assessment" (EIA), "strategic environmental assessment" (SEA), "cumulative effect assessment" (CEA), and "environmental (or ecological) risk assessment" (ERA). Addressing the need for a conceptual "umbrella" for the fragmented approaches, a generic framework for environmental assessment is proposed: cumulative effects of offshore activities (CUMULEO). CUMULEO builds on the principle that activities cause pressures that may lead to adverse effects on the ecosystem. Basic elements and variables are defined that can be used consistently throughout sequential decision-making levels and diverse methodological implementations. This enables environmental assessment to start at a high strategic level (i.e., plan and/or program level), resulting in early environmental awareness and subsequently more informed, efficient, and focused project-level assessments, which has clear benefits for both industry and government. Its main strengths are simplicity, transparency, flexibility (allowing the use of both qualitative and quantitative data), and visualization, making it a powerful framework to support discussions with experts, stakeholders, and policymakers. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:632-642. © 2015 SETAC.
Keywords: Human activities; Impact assessment; Multiple pressures; Visualization tool.
© 2015 SETAC.
Similar articles
-
Application of ecosystem services in natural resource management decision making.
Moore DW, Booth P, Alix A, Apitz SE, Forrow D, Huber-Sannwald E, Jayasundara N. Moore DW, et al. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jan;13(1):74-84. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1838. Epub 2016 Oct 5. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017. PMID: 27474860
-
"And DPSIR begat DAPSI(W)R(M)!" - A unifying framework for marine environmental management.
Elliott M, Burdon D, Atkins JP, Borja A, Cormier R, de Jonge VN, Turner RK. Elliott M, et al. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 May 15;118(1-2):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.049. Epub 2017 Apr 7. Mar Pollut Bull. 2017. PMID: 28396077
-
Conceptual Framework for Assessing Ecosystem Health.
Harwell MA, Gentile JH, McKinney LD, Tunnell JW Jr, Dennison WC, Kelsey RH, Stanzel KM, Stunz GW, Withers K, Tunnell J. Harwell MA, et al. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Jul;15(4):544-564. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4152. Epub 2019 Jul 25. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019. PMID: 30908815 Free PMC article.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S. Jardine C, et al. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
-
Brown AR, Whale G, Jackson M, Marshall S, Hamer M, Solga A, Kabouw P, Galay-Burgos M, Woods R, Nadzialek S, Maltby L. Brown AR, et al. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jan;13(1):17-37. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1797. Epub 2016 Aug 10. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017. PMID: 27243906 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources