pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis to Determine Quality Indicators forHealth Professions Education Blogs and Podcasts - PubMed

Review

A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis to Determine Quality Indicators forHealth Professions Education Blogs and Podcasts

Quinten S Paterson et al. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Historically, trainees in undergraduate and graduate health professions education have relied on secondary resources, such as textbooks and lectures, for core learning activities. Recently, blogs and podcasts have entered into mainstream usage, especially for residents and educators. These low-cost, widely available resources have many characteristics of disruptive innovations and, if they continue to improve in quality, have the potential to reinvigorate health professions education. One potential limitation of further growth in the use of these resources is the lack of information on their quality and effectiveness.

Objective: To identify quality indicators for secondary resources that are described in the literature, which might be applicable to blogs and podcasts.

Methods: Using a blended research methodology, we performed a systematic literature review using Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ERIC to identify quality indicators for secondary resources. A qualitative analysis of these indicators resulted in the organization of this information into themes and subthemes. Expert focus groups were convened to triangulate these findings and ensure that no relevant quality indicators were missed.

Results: The literature search identified 4530 abstracts, and quality indicators were extracted from 157 articles. The qualitative analysis produced 3 themes (credibility, content, and design), 13 subthemes, and 151 quality indicators.

Conclusions: The list of quality indicators resulting from our analysis can be used by stakeholders, including learners, educators, academic leaders, and blog/podcast producers. Further studies are being conducted, which will refine the list into a form that is more structured and stratified for use by these stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Michelle Lin is a deputy editor for DynaMed. Brent Thoma, Michelle Lin, Ken Milne, and Teresa Chan are unpaid editors and contributors to various medical education websites, blogs, and podcasts. Teresa Chan and Brent Thoma have received funding from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada for other graduate studies and other unaffiliated projects.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Flowchart Demonstrating the Process of Literature Search and Article Inclusion

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2

Qualitative Thematic Analysis That Resulted in Final List of 151 Quality Indicators (QI's) for Blogs and Podcasts

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510–520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cadogan M, Thoma B, Chan TM, Lin M. Free open access meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002–2013) Emerg Med J. 2014;31(e1):e76–e77. - PubMed
    1. Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C, Davies BJ, Averch TD, Woo HH, et al. Use of social media in urology: data from the American Urological Association (AUA) BJU Int. 2014;113(6):993–998. - PubMed
    1. Mallin M, Schlein S, Doctor S, Stroud S, Dawson M, Fix M. A survey of the current utilization of asynchronous education among emergency medicine residents in the United States. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):598–601. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Purdy E, Thoma B, Bednarczyk J, Migneault D, Sherbino J. The use of free online educational resources by Canadian emergency medicine residents and program directors. CJEM. 2015;17(2):101–106. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources