Use of De Novo Transcriptome Libraries to Characterize a Novel Oleaginous Marine Chlorella Species during the Accumulation of Triacylglycerols - PubMed
- ️Fri Jan 01 2016
Use of De Novo Transcriptome Libraries to Characterize a Novel Oleaginous Marine Chlorella Species during the Accumulation of Triacylglycerols
Cresten B Mansfeldt et al. PLoS One. 2016.
Abstract
Marine chlorophytes of the genus Chlorella are unicellular algae capable of accumulating a high proportion of cellular lipids that can be used for biodiesel production. In this study, we examined the broad physiological capabilities of a subtropical strain (C596) of Chlorella sp. "SAG-211-18" including its heterotrophic growth and tolerance to low salt. We found that the alga replicates more slowly at diluted salt concentrations and can grow on a wide range of carbon substrates in the dark. We then sequenced the RNA of Chlorella strain C596 to elucidate key metabolic genes and investigate the transcriptomic response of the organism when transitioning from a nutrient-replete to a nutrient-deficient condition when neutral lipids accumulate. Specific transcripts encoding for enzymes involved in both starch and lipid biosynthesis, among others, were up-regulated as the cultures transitioned into a lipid-accumulating state whereas photosynthesis-related genes were down-regulated. Transcripts encoding for two of the up-regulated enzymes-a galactoglycerolipid lipase and a diacylglyceride acyltransferase-were also monitored by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays. The results of these assays confirmed the transcriptome-sequencing data. The present transcriptomic study will assist in the greater understanding, more effective application, and efficient design of Chlorella-based biofuel production systems.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86ece/86ece9623236f7b119dd512ae50efe29a35cb71c" alt="Fig 1"
The asterisks indicates organisms with available genomes in the NCBI database. The representative full-length 18S rRNA sequences were aligned with MUSCLE in MEGA 6.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d003/1d003ceedf9103e85d45c18c7a33ee6fc1ce9b80" alt="Fig 2"
(a) Time-course of a batch experiment culminating in N and P co-limitation (N:P = 13:1): nitrate+nitrite (black, solid), phosphate (black, dashed), cells (blue), TAG (red, solid), and total lipids (red, dashed) concentrations; error bars represent the 95% confidence interval. (b-g) Fluorescence and phase contrast microscopy of strain C596 cells grown in batch culture culminating in P limitation (N:P = 30:1). Samples were withdrawn during the exponential phase (b-d) and four days after onset of stationary (e-g) growth phase. The fluorescence microscopy reveals the chloroplast (autoflourescence, bright white) and Nile red stained lipids (in c and f; grey). The red arrows and brackets indicate intercellular TAG locations. The white arrows highlight the chloroplast.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d44a8/d44a803352bfbd20b86007333bccc0f8a0d0ce31" alt="Fig 3"
Growth rates (d-1, based on cell density over time) are shown for (a) different salinities and (b) various carbon substrates. White bars indicate photosynthetic growth with a PPFD of 80 μmol photons m−2 s−1; gray bars indicate grown in the dark plus a carbon source at a final concentration of 20 mmol L−1; the black bar indicates growth in the dark. Values are the means of triplicate biological replicates (n = 3); error bars represent ±1 standard error (SE).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9fe0/c9fe07196af302feeae1a8e92fb89a433ab84527" alt="Fig 4"
Genes are considered differentially expressed when the edgeR p-value < 0.05 and the fold-ratio > 2 or < 0.5. The assignment of a transcript to a category is based upon the KEGG annotation of orthologs in C. variabilis NC64A. The axis of the dot plot displays the ratio of 182/109 h on a log scale. The numbers in the category column represent the number of genes down-regulated (-), up-regulated (+), and the difference between these (Δ). The color shading is based on the Δ (positive, red; negative, blue).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c99e/4c99e22f6ff2b1df0bd30272f8dc697465b3d80d" alt="Fig 5"
(a) The final steps of the TAG biosynthesis pathway. The symbols indicate whether one or more transcripts encode the enzyme at that step is present for Chlorella strain C596 (circle), C. variabilis NC64A (square), or C. reinhardtii (triangle). Grey shading indicates presence. Lined shading for the glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase indicates a bacterial-type homolog. Lined shading for the diacylglycerol acyltransferase indicates a secondary homolog in C. reinhardtii. (b) Heatmaps of the cyclophillin-normalized values for the putative transcripts for the TAG accumulation pathway and galactoglycerolipid lipase in samples taken during exponential growth (89 and 109 h) and during lipid accumulation (182 h). The intensity of the shading represents cyclophillin normalized values ranging from 0 to 1.8; note, one transcript, c10691_g3, falls outside of this range and the appropriate box is labeled. The * symbol represents those transcripts for which RT-qPCR primers were designed. The † symbol represents the transcript whose ratio could not be calculated because the transcript was not detected in the 109 h sample. (c) Comparison of the RNA-seq (top row) and RT-qPCR results also normalized to cyclophillin (bottom row) for the predicted DAGAT (left column) and galactoglycerolipid lipase (right column) for two biological duplicates (a and b). The error bars indicate the 95% confidence interval of the technical replicates run for the RT-qPCR.
Similar articles
-
Genomic Foundation of Starch-to-Lipid Switch in Oleaginous Chlorella spp.
Fan J, Ning K, Zeng X, Luo Y, Wang D, Hu J, Li J, Xu H, Huang J, Wan M, Wang W, Zhang D, Shen G, Run C, Liao J, Fang L, Huang S, Jing X, Su X, Wang A, Bai L, Hu Z, Xu J, Li Y. Fan J, et al. Plant Physiol. 2015 Dec;169(4):2444-61. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01174. Epub 2015 Oct 20. Plant Physiol. 2015. PMID: 26486592 Free PMC article.
-
Fan J, Cui Y, Zhou Y, Wan M, Wang W, Xie J, Li Y. Fan J, et al. Bioresour Technol. 2014 Jul;164:214-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.087. Epub 2014 May 9. Bioresour Technol. 2014. PMID: 24859213
-
Gao C, Wang Y, Shen Y, Yan D, He X, Dai J, Wu Q. Gao C, et al. BMC Genomics. 2014 Jul 10;15(1):582. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-582. BMC Genomics. 2014. PMID: 25012212 Free PMC article.
-
Wan MX, Wang RM, Xia JL, Rosenberg JN, Nie ZY, Kobayashi N, Oyler GA, Betenbaugh MJ. Wan MX, et al. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012 Aug;109(8):1958-64. doi: 10.1002/bit.24477. Epub 2012 Mar 2. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012. PMID: 22354808
-
Richter LV, Mansfeldt CB, Kuan MM, Cesare AE, Menefee ST, Richardson RE, Ahner BA. Richter LV, et al. Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Jun 19;52(12):6854-6863. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b06581. Epub 2018 May 25. Environ Sci Technol. 2018. PMID: 29750518
Cited by
-
Richter LV, Yang H, Yazdani M, Hanson MR, Ahner BA. Richter LV, et al. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 May 10;11:133. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1127-7. eCollection 2018. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018. PMID: 29760775 Free PMC article.
-
Koh HG, Cho JM, Jeon S, Chang YK, Lee B, Kang NK. Koh HG, et al. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2023 Jul 15;16(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13068-023-02358-4. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2023. PMID: 37454088 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular basis of autotrophic vs mixotrophic growth in Chlorella sorokiniana.
Cecchin M, Benfatto S, Griggio F, Mori A, Cazzaniga S, Vitulo N, Delledonne M, Ballottari M. Cecchin M, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 24;8(1):6465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24979-8. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29691462 Free PMC article.
-
Mora-Godínez S, Senés-Guerrero C, Pacheco A. Mora-Godínez S, et al. PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0299780. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299780. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38758755 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Williams PJlB, Laurens LML. Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: Review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. Energy and Environmental Science. 2010;3:554–590. 10.1039/b924978h - DOI
-
- Zhu L. Biorefinery as a promising approach to promote microalgae industry: An innovative framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015;41:1376–1384. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.040 - DOI
-
- Volkman J, Jeffrey S, Nichols P, Rogers G, Garland C. Fatty acid and lipid composition of 10 species of microalgae used in mariculture. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1989;128(3):219–240. 10.1016/0022-0981(89)90029-4 - DOI
-
- Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P. A look back at the US Department of Energy’s aquatic species program: biodiesel from algae. vol. 328 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden; 1998.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
The United States Department of Energy (www.energy.gov) provided funding under grant number DE-EE0003371. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources