Non-hormonal and hormonal intrauterine contraception: survey of patients' perceptions in four Latin American countries - PubMed
Non-hormonal and hormonal intrauterine contraception: survey of patients' perceptions in four Latin American countries
Agnaldo Lopes da Silva-Filho et al. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jun.
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to understand women's perceived barriers to the use of hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine contraception in Latin America.
Methods: We developed an online survey for women in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia and Mexico who were seeking contraception. The questions aimed at evaluating patient awareness of negative stories and statements, as well as perceived barriers to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).
Results: The survey was mailed to 2300 women. A total of 1953 responses were received from Argentina (n = 465), Brazil (n = 380), Colombia (n = 613) and Mexico (n = 495). More women reported having heard negative stories about the copper IUD than about the LNG-IUS. More women believed that the copper IUD, rather than the LNG-IUS, was suitable only for those who had already had children. More women believed that weight gain (14.3% vs. 38.2%; p < 0.001), mood swings (14.1% vs. 38.7%; p < 0.001) and infertility (16.3% vs. 19.9%; p = 0.016) were possible side effects of the LNG-IUS. By contrast, more women believed that abortion (36% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001), pelvic infections (42.1% vs. 15.7%; p < 0.001) and ectopic pregnancy (43.5% vs 23.5%; p < 0.001) were side effects more associated with the copper IUD. More believed the copper IUD was associated with less pain during placement and removal compared with the LNG-IUS (42.8% vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001). The perception of increased risk of contracting a sexual transmitted disease did not differ between the methods (IUD vs. LNG-IUS, 21.7% vs. 20.3%; p = 0.388).
Conclusions: Respondents to a web-based survey in four Latin American countries have misperceptions regarding the adverse effects and risks of intrauterine contraception, which may hamper the use of these safe and efficient contraceptive methods. Education about the true risks and benefits involved is fundamental to improving patient acceptance and compliance as well as reducing unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions.
Keywords: Intrauterine contraception; intrauterine device; knowledge.
Similar articles
-
Kakaire O, Tumwesigye NM, Byamugisha JK, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Kakaire O, et al. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jun;21(3):220-6. doi: 10.3109/13625187.2016.1146249. Epub 2016 Feb 19. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016. PMID: 26895345 Clinical Trial.
-
Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Heinemann K, et al. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):280-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 16. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 25601350 Clinical Trial.
-
Sivin I, Stern J, Diaz J, Diaz MM, Faundes A, el Mahgoub S, Diaz S, Pavez M, Coutinho E, Mattos CE, et al. Sivin I, et al. Contraception. 1987 Mar;35(3):245-55. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(87)90026-6. Contraception. 1987. PMID: 3111785 Clinical Trial.
-
A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
Sturridge F, Guillebaud J. Sturridge F, et al. Drug Saf. 1996 Dec;15(6):430-40. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199615060-00006. Drug Saf. 1996. PMID: 8968696 Review.
-
Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.
Krashin J, Tang JH, Mody S, Lopez LM. Krashin J, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 17;2015(8):CD009805. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009805.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26280888 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Harris DM, Dam A, Morrison K, Mann C, Jackson A, Bledsoe SM, Rowan A, Longfield K. Harris DM, et al. Stud Fam Plann. 2022 Sep;53(3):455-490. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12209. Epub 2022 Aug 3. Stud Fam Plann. 2022. PMID: 35922382 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Borges ALV, Araújo KS, Santos OAD, Gonçalves RFS, Fujimori E, Divino EDA. Borges ALV, et al. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Feb 14;28:e3232. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3140.3232. eCollection 2020. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020. PMID: 32074205 Free PMC article.
-
Maceira D, Oizerovich S, Perrotta G, de León RGP, Karolinski A, Suarez N, Espinola N, Caffe S, Chandra-Mouli V. Maceira D, et al. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2189507. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2189507. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023. PMID: 37042700 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes Toward the Copper IUD in Sweden: A Survey Study.
Wemrell M, Gunnarsson L. Wemrell M, et al. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Jul 8;3:920298. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.920298. eCollection 2022. Front Glob Womens Health. 2022. PMID: 35873134 Free PMC article.
-
Belizan M, Maradiaga E, Roberti J, Casco-Aguilar M, Ortez AF, Avila-Flores JC, González G, Bustillo C, Calderón A, Bock H, Cafferata ML, Tavares AB, Alger J, Ali M. Belizan M, et al. BMC Womens Health. 2020 Sep 12;20(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01066-7. BMC Womens Health. 2020. PMID: 32919474 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical