pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Severely comminuted radius fracture presenting as a signature patterned injury - PubMed

Severely comminuted radius fracture presenting as a signature patterned injury

Saurabh Jain et al. Indian J Orthop. 2016 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Dilemma still prevails, regarding the exact management of mangled extremity injuries between limb salvage versus amputation, each having there own set of complications. We here present a case of severely comminuted fractures of radius (bag of bones) along with the multiple criss-cross shaped lacerated wounds on the forearm and wrist presenting as a "signature pattern injury" caused by entrapment of the limb in the concrete mixer. MESS score of patient was 8, a score valid for amputation, but contrary, we successfully salvaged the patient's limb with use of radio-carpal distracter. Management of mangled injuries should be individualized, with due consideration to the mechanism and force of injury, associated injuries, and the patient profile.

Keywords: Bag of bones; Radius fractures; bone; fracture fixation; fractures; radius; severely comminuted fracture; signature patterned fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) (a) and lateral (b) X-ray of forearm with wrist and AP (c) X-rays of hand with wrist of the patient showing severely comminuted middle and distal radius fracture (bag of bones), with intraarticular extension with fracture 1st and 2nd metacarpal, with crushed thumb and severely comminuted fracture of the proximal and distal phalanx of the thumb and intact ulna and carpals and maintenance of the inter carpal relation

Figure 2
Figure 2

Immediate postoperative anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) X-ray of the forearm with wrist showing application of the radio-carpal distracter

Figure 3
Figure 3

Anteroposterior (a) and lateral (b) X-ray at final followup (7 months) showing sound union. (c and d) Clinical photographs of the patient showing functional outcome (e and f) Clinical photograph showing palmar-flexion and dorsi-flexion

Similar articles

References

    1. Bumbasirevic M, Stevanovic M, Lesic A, Atkinson HD. Current management of the mangled upper extremity. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2189–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prasarn ML, Helfet DL, Kloen P. Management of the mangled extremity. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2012;7:57–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oakes R, Urban A, Levy PD. The mangled extremity. J Emerg Med. 2008;35:437–44. - PubMed
    1. Togawa S, Yamami N, Nakayama H, Mano Y, Ikegami K, Ozeki S. The validity of the mangled extremity severity score in the assessment of upper limb injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1516–9. - PubMed
    1. Slauterbeck JR, Britton C, Moneim MS, Clevenger FW. Mangled extremity severity score: An accurate guide to treatment of the severely injured upper extremity. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8:282–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources