Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults - PubMed
- ️Fri Jan 01 2016
Review
Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults
Sheena Derry et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016.
Abstract
Background: Use of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to treat chronic musculoskeletal conditions has become widely accepted because they can provide pain relief without associated systemic adverse events. This review is an update of 'Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults', originally published in Issue 9, 2012.
Objectives: To review the evidence from randomised, double-blind, controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of topically applied NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and our own in-house database; the date of the last search was February 2016. We also searched the references lists of included studies and reviews, and sought unpublished studies by asking personal contacts and searching online clinical trial registers and manufacturers' web sites.
Selection criteria: We included randomised, double-blind, active or inert carrier (placebo) controlled trials in which treatments were administered to adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain of moderate or severe intensity. Studies had to meet stringent quality criteria and there had to be at least 10 participants in each treatment arm, with application of treatment at least once daily.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion and extracted data. We used numbers of participants achieving each outcome to calculate risk ratio and numbers needed to treat (NNT) or harm (NNH) compared to carrier or other active treatment. We were particularly interested to compare different formulations (gel, cream, plaster) of individual NSAIDs. The primary outcome was 'clinical success', defined as at least a 50% reduction in pain, or an equivalent measure such as a 'very good' or 'excellent' global assessment of treatment, or 'none' or 'slight' pain on rest or movement, measured on a categorical scale.
Main results: We identified five new studies for this update, which now has information from 10,631 participants in 39 studies, a 38% increase in participants from the earlier review; 33 studies compared a topical NSAID with carrier. All studies examined topical NSAIDs for treatment of osteoarthritis, and for pooled analyses studies were generally of moderate or high methodological quality, although we considered some at risk of bias from short duration and small size.In studies lasting 6 to 12 weeks, topical diclofenac and topical ketoprofen were significantly more effective than carrier for reducing pain; about 60% of participants had much reduced pain. With topical diclofenac, the NNT for clinical success in six trials (2343 participants) was 9.8 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.1 to 16) (moderate quality evidence). With topical ketoprofen, the NNT for clinical success in four trials (2573 participants) was 6.9 (5.4 to 9.3) (moderate quality evidence). There was too little information for analysis of other individual topical NSAIDs compared with carrier. Few trials compared a topical NSAID to an oral NSAID, but overall they showed similar efficacy (low quality evidence). These efficacy results were almost completely derived from people with knee osteoarthritis.There was an increase in local adverse events (mostly mild skin reactions) with topical diclofenac compared with carrier or oral NSAIDs, but no increase with topical ketoprofen (moderate quality evidence). Reporting of systemic adverse events (such as gastrointestinal upsets) was poor, but where reported there was no difference between topical NSAID and carrier (very low quality evidence). Serious adverse events were infrequent and not different between topical NSAID and carrier (very low quality evidence).Clinical success with carrier occurred commonly - in around half the participants in studies lasting 6 to 12 weeks. Both direct and indirect comparison of clinical success with oral placebo indicates that response rates with carrier (topical placebo) are about twice those seen with oral placebo.A substantial amount of data from completed, unpublished studies was unavailable (up to 6000 participants). To the best of our knowledge, much of this probably relates to formulations that have never been marketed.
Authors' conclusions: Topical diclofenac and topical ketoprofen can provide good levels of pain relief beyond carrier in osteoarthritis for a minority of people, but there is no evidence for other chronic painful conditions. There is emerging evidence that at least some of the substantial placebo effects seen in longer duration studies derive from effects imparted by the NSAID carrier itself, and that NSAIDs add to that.
Conflict of interest statement
SD: none known.
PC is a specialist rheumatologist and manages patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. He was an author of two studies included in this review. He was not involved in data coding or data extraction for these studies. He has received speaking fees from Abbvie, BMS, and Roche (2013).
JdS is a specialist rheumatologist and manages patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
PW: none known.
RAM: has received institutional grant support from Reckitt Benckiser (RB) relating to individual patient level analyses of trial data on ibuprofen in acute pain and the effects of food on drug absorption of analgesics (2013), and from Grünenthal relating to individual patient level analyses of trial data regarding tapentadol in osteoarthritis and back pain (2015). He has received honoraria for attended boards with Menarini concerning methods of analgesic trial design (2014), with Novartis (2014) about the design of network meta‐analyses, and RB on understanding pharmacokinetics of drug uptake (2015). None of these activities was related to topical NSAIDs. Novartis and/or its subsidiaries may market a diclofenac gel product; Menarini or its subsidiaries markets a ketoprofen gel product; and RB or its subsidiaries markets an ibuprofen gel product. As far as is known, only diclofenac gel product is licensed for use in osteoarthritis.
This review was identified in a 2019 audit as not meeting the current definition of the Cochrane Commercial Sponsorship policy. At the time of its publication it was compliant with the interpretation of the existing policy. As with all reviews, new and updated, at update this review will be revised according to 2020 policy update.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b868/8b868ea683b6dda91babbfee60938ac20e7c9ebb" alt="1"
Study flow diagram.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fff6/4fff61e5b9caa63d36288e49f7e793ff056c9b51" alt="2"
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/907d7/907d737b99da974b4778b598bc0cc780636968f6" alt="3"
Forest plot of comparison: 8 Diclofenac versus carrier, outcome: 8.1 Clinical success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d43c/4d43c137b29e40751132478a5e68de0e3cdd5e0b" alt="4"
Forest plot of comparison: 9 Ketoprofen versus carrier, outcome: 9.1 Clinical success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8e80/d8e808b80997e656007ad0cc4f454b9237acaef5" alt="5"
Forest plot of comparison: Topical NSAID versus oral NSAID, outcome: Clinical success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eff49/eff4927112e0e8c8cd539640c83ab68ec21bd1e5" alt="6"
Placebo responses in topical NSAID studies for at least 50% pain intensity reduction after 12 weeks, compared with oral placebo from a pooled analysis and a single study with direct comparison with topical placebo.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fff94/fff948fbf38bd1f0f923afee828d6096245a6cb3" alt="1.1"
Comparison 1 Topical diclofenac versus carrier, Outcome 1 Clinical success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94115/941154a135d6a6e2225e502b4e85b57b9460d179" alt="1.2"
Comparison 1 Topical diclofenac versus carrier, Outcome 2 Local adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77a43/77a4368841a0f4cdb2a430b81ee990f7d6370bbc" alt="1.3"
Comparison 1 Topical diclofenac versus carrier, Outcome 3 Systemic adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/124a8/124a881ccbd4f926dc93473f49c6c0e317657659" alt="1.4"
Comparison 1 Topical diclofenac versus carrier, Outcome 4 Gastrointestinal adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b15e4/b15e490ced180674c2c6be1ca7042a42749cf011" alt="1.5"
Comparison 1 Topical diclofenac versus carrier, Outcome 5 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50120/50120182a5bb8889274112dcc63446f52712acd7" alt="1.6"
Comparison 1 Topical diclofenac versus carrier, Outcome 6 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba6f5/ba6f58c448ddb6fa28808a627b834f1942721426" alt="2.1"
Comparison 2 Topical ketoprofen versus carrier, Outcome 1 Clinical success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2299/a2299cc8dbf8e70f86ed97e265f0ac5d2a7ec601" alt="2.2"
Comparison 2 Topical ketoprofen versus carrier, Outcome 2 Local adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d0a4/9d0a466c0db015730ffda60a533f2e0d076b77e8" alt="2.3"
Comparison 2 Topical ketoprofen versus carrier, Outcome 3 Gastrointestinal adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/179ef/179ef859ade554d2578d824e6c4c29429490d675" alt="2.4"
Comparison 2 Topical ketoprofen versus carrier, Outcome 4 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fabbe/fabbe83972bec2caccdd718dd13548e5a6d3e1b8" alt="2.5"
Comparison 2 Topical ketoprofen versus carrier, Outcome 5 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99bde/99bdeffb9b10b7457188055edfec100c83bafa96" alt="3.1"
Comparison 3 Topical NSAID versus oral NSAID, Outcome 1 Clinical success.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78331/78331b0a9aab5c9ae82a2af51e2b03b035f10507" alt="3.2"
Comparison 3 Topical NSAID versus oral NSAID, Outcome 2 Local adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f6b6/2f6b62a108fc1d30d3cad798c18e856f725726f1" alt="3.3"
Comparison 3 Topical NSAID versus oral NSAID, Outcome 3 Gastrointestinal adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef15d/ef15d7694403e2dbb8c44cbd0f2d5b54a65ada41" alt="3.4"
Comparison 3 Topical NSAID versus oral NSAID, Outcome 4 Withdrawals due to adverse events.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/754e0/754e0f27f99655467f31556b0a4c257f2ccfad82" alt="3.5"
Comparison 3 Topical NSAID versus oral NSAID, Outcome 5 Withdrawals due to lack of efficacy.
Update of
-
Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.
Derry S, Moore RA, Rabbie R. Derry S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;9(9):CD007400. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007400.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22972108 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Comment in
-
Cochrane in CORR®: Topical NSAIDs for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Adults.
Adili A, Bhandari M. Adili A, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Nov;476(11):2128-2134. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000486. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018. PMID: 30247232 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Topical NSAIDs for acute musculoskeletal pain in adults.
Derry S, Moore RA, Gaskell H, McIntyre M, Wiffen PJ. Derry S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 11;2015(6):CD007402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007402.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26068955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.
Derry S, Moore RA, Rabbie R. Derry S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;9(9):CD007400. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007400.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22972108 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Topical analgesics for acute and chronic pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane Reviews.
Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Kalso EA, Bell RF, Aldington D, Phillips T, Gaskell H, Moore RA. Derry S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 12;5(5):CD008609. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008609.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28497473 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Topical NSAIDs for acute pain in adults.
Massey T, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Massey T, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD007402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007402.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. PMID: 20556778 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Single dose oral ketoprofen or dexketoprofen for acute postoperative pain in adults.
Gaskell H, Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. Gaskell H, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD007355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007355.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28540716 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Insights from pharmacovigilance and pharmacodynamics on cardiovascular safety signals of NSAIDs.
Liang S, Wang X, Zhu X. Liang S, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1455212. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1455212. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39295938 Free PMC article.
-
Martin-Vega FJ, Lucena-Anton D, Galán-Mercant A, Perez-Cabezas V, Luque-Moreno C, Vinolo-Gil MJ, Gonzalez-Medina G. Martin-Vega FJ, et al. Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 14;10(12):3254. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123254. Biomedicines. 2022. PMID: 36552010 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Odineal DD, Marois MT, Ward D, Schmid CH, Cabrera R, Sim I, Wang Y, Wilsey B, Duan N, Henry SG, Kravitz RL. Odineal DD, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):102-111. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05303-0. Epub 2019 Aug 28. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 31463686 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Bonet IJM, Araldi D, Green PG, Levine JD. Bonet IJM, et al. Pain. 2023 Dec 1;164(12):2653-2664. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002993. Epub 2023 Jul 18. Pain. 2023. PMID: 37467181 Free PMC article.
-
Ehsanian R, Fernandez S, Cooper A, Cushman DM, Conger A, Burnham T, Fogarty AE, Aiyer R, Smolinski K, McCormick ZL. Ehsanian R, et al. Interv Pain Med. 2024 Aug 19;3(3):100432. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100432. eCollection 2024 Sep. Interv Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 39502912 Free PMC article.
References
References to studies included in this review
102‐93‐1 {unpublished data only}
-
- A double‐blind, multi‐centred, randomized, placebo‐controlled, four‐way parallel, clinical trial designed to confirm the safety and efficacy of PENNSAID™ in the treatment of osteoarthritic knee. Data supplied by Nuvo.
108‐97 {unpublished data only}
-
- A double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled, four‐way parallel, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PENNSAID™ treatment of the osteoarthritic hand. Data supplied by Nuvo.
Altman 2009 {published data only}
-
- Novartis (Sponsor). Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Gel in Hand Osteoarthritis. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00171665 (accessed 9 February 2016) 2015. [CTG: NCT00171665]
Baer 2005 {published data only}
Balthazar‐Letawe 1987 {published data only}
-
- Balthazar‐Letawe D. Voltaren Emulgel in clinical rheumatology. Comparative trial with Indocid gel [Voltaren Emulgel en pratique rhumatologique. Essai comparatif avec Indocid gel]. Acta Belgica Medica Physica 1987;10:109‐10. - PubMed
Baraf 2011 {published data only}
-
- Efficacy and safety of diclofenac sodium gel (DSG) in knee osteoarthritis [NCT00426621]. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 14 February 2012] 2007.
-
- Efficacy and safety of diclofenac sodium gel in knee osteoarthritis [NCT00171678]. www.ClinicalTrials.gov [accessed 14 February 2012] 2007.
-
- Baraf HS, Gloth FM, Barthel HR, Gold MS, Altman RD. Safety and efficacy of topical diclofenac sodium gel for knee osteoarthritis in elderly and younger patients: pooled data from three randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group, placebo‐controlled, multicentre trials. Drugs Aging 2011;28(1):27‐40. - PubMed
Bolten 1991 {published data only}
-
- Bolten W. Felbinac gel for treatment of localized extra‐articular rheumatic diseases ‐ a multicenter, placebo [Felbinac‐Gel zur Behandlung lokalisierter extraartikulärer rheumatischer Beschwerden ‐ eine multizentrische, placebokontrollierte, randomisierte Studie]. Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie 1991;50:109‐13. - PubMed
Bookman 2004 {published data only}
Bruhlmann 2003 {published data only}
-
- Brühlmann P, Michel BA. Topical diclofenac patch in patients. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2003;21:193‐8. - PubMed
Burgos 2001 {published data only}
-
- Burgos A, Busquier MP, Reino JG, Ferreiro JL, Navarro F, Valverde J, et al. Double‐blind, double‐dummy comparative study of local action transcutaneous flurbiprofen (flurbiprofenLAT) versus piketoprofen cream in the treatment of extraarticular rheumatism. Clinical Drug Investigation 2001;21:95‐102.
Conaghan 2013 {published data only}
-
- Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Bolten W, Cevc G, Rother M. A multicentre, randomized, placebo‐ and active‐controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of topical ketoprofen in Transfersome gel (IDEA‐033) with ketoprofen‐free vehicle (TDT 064) and oral celecoxib for knee pain associated with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52(7):1303‐12. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket133] - DOI - PubMed
Dickson 1991 {published data only}
-
- Dickson DJ. A double‐blind evaluation of topical piroxicam gel with oral ibuprofen in osteoarthritis of the knee. Current Therapeutic Research 1991;49:199‐07.
Dreiser 1993 {published data only}
-
- Dreiser RL, Tisne‐Camus M. DHEP plasters as a topical treatment of knee osteoarthritis ‐ a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 1993;19:117‐23. - PubMed
Ergun 2007 {published data only}
Galeazzi 1993 {published data only}
-
- Galeazzi M, Marcolongo R. A placebo‐controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of a nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug, DHEP plaster, in inflammatory peri‐ and extra‐articular rheumatological diseases. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 1993;19:107‐15. - PubMed
Grace 1999 {published data only}
-
- Grace D, Rogers J, Skeith K, Anderson K. Topical diclofenac versus placebo: a double blind, randomized clinical trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal of Rheumatology 1999;26:2659‐63. - PubMed
Gui 1982 {published data only}
-
- Gui L, Pellacci F, Ghirardini G. Use of ibuprofen cream in ambulatory orthopedic patients. Double blind comparison with placebo [Impiego dell'ibuprofen crema inpazienti ambulatoriali di interesse ortopedico. Confronto indoppia cecità con placebo]. Clinical Therapeutics 1982;101:363‐9. - PubMed
Hohmeister 1983 {published data only}
-
- Hohmeister R. Treatment of rheumatic diseases of soft tissues with Mobilisin Gel. Results of a double blind study [Die Behandlung von weichteilrheumatischenErkrankungen mit Mobilisin Gel. Resultate einer Doppelblind‐Studie]. Fortschritte der Medizin 1983;101:1586‐8. - PubMed
Kneer 2013 {published data only}
-
- Kneer W, Rother M, Mazgareanu S, Seidel EJ, European IDEA‐033 study group. A 12‐week randomized study of topical therapy with three dosages of ketoprofen in Transfersome® gel (IDEA‐033) compared with the ketoprofen‐free vehicle (TDT 064), in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal of Pain Research 2013;6:743‐53. [DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S51054] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Link 1996 {published data only}
-
- Link R, Balint G, Pavlik G, Otto J, Krause W. Topical treatment of soft tissue rheumatism and athletic injuries. Effectiveness and tolerance of a new ketoprofengel [Topische Behandlungvon Weichteil‐rheumatismus und Sportverletzungen. Wirksamkeitund Verträglichkeit eines neuen Ketoprofengels]. Fortschritte der Medizin 1996;114:311‐4. - PubMed
McCleane 2000 {published data only}
-
- McCleane G. The addition of piroxicam to topically applied glyceryl trinitrate enhances its analgesic effect in musculoskeletal pain: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Pain Clinic 2000;12:113‐6.
NCT01980940 {published data only}
-
- Merck Sharp, Dohme Corp (Sponsor). A study to assess the single dose pharmacokinetics of two and proof of efficacy of one new etoricoxib gel formulation in osteoarthritis patients. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01980940 (accessed 19 November 2015) 2015. [CTG: NCT01980940]
Niethard 2005 {published data only}
-
- Niethard FU, Gold MS, Solomon GS, Liu JH, Unkauf M, Albrecht HH, et al. Efficacy of topical diclofenac diethylamine gel in osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal of Rheumatology 2005;32(12):2384‐92. - PubMed
Ottillinger 2001 {published data only}
Poul 1993 {published data only}
Rose 1991 {published data only}
-
- Rose W, Manz G, Lemmel EM. Topical application of piroxicam‐gel in the treatment of activated gonarthrosis [Behandlung der aktivierten gonarthrose mit topisch appliziertem piroxicam‐gel]. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 1991;133:562‐6.
Roth 1995 {published data only}
-
- Roth SH. A controlled clinical investigation of 3% diclofenac/2.5% sodium hyaluronate topical gel in the treatment of uncontrolled pain in chronic oral NSAID users with osteoarthritis. International Journal of Tissue Reactions 1995;4:129‐32. - PubMed
Roth 2004 {published data only}
-
- Roth SH, Shainhouse JZ. Efficacy and safety of a topical diclofenac solution (Pennsaid) in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee. Archives of Internal Medicine 2004;164:2017‐23. - PubMed
Rother 2007 {published data only}
-
- Rother M, Lavins BJ, Kneer W, Lehnhardt K, Egbert J, Mazgareanu S. Efficacy and safety of epicutaneous ketoprofen in Transfersome (IDEA‐033) versus oral celecoxib and placebo in osteoarthritis of the knee: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2007;66:1178‐83. [DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.065128] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Rother 2013 {published data only}
Sandelin 1997 {published data only}
-
- Sandelin J, Harilainen A, Crone H, Hamberg P, Forsskahl B, Tamelander G. Local NSAID gel (eltenac) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. A double blind study comparing eltenac with oral diclofenac and placebo gel. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 1997;26:287‐92. - PubMed
Simon 2009 {published data only}
-
- Simon LS, Grierson LM, Naseer Z, Bookman AA, Shainhouse JZ. Efficacy and safety of topical diclofenac containing dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) compared with those of topical placebo, DMSO vehicle and oral diclofenac for knee osteoarthritis. Pain 2009;143(3):238‐45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.008] - DOI - PubMed
Tugwell 2004 {published data only}
-
- Tugwell PS, Wells GA, Shainhouse JZ. Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution (Pennsaid) compared with oral diclofenac in symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rheumatology 2004;31(10):2002‐12. - PubMed
van Haselen 2000 {published data only}
-
- Haselen RA, Fisher PA. A randomized controlled trial comparing topical piroxicam gel with a homeopathic gel in osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 2000;39:714‐9. - PubMed
Varadi 2013 {published data only}
-
- Varadi G, Zhu Z, Blattler T, Hosle M, Loher A, Pokorny R, et al. Randomized clinical trial evaluating transdermal Ibuprofen for moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis. Pain Physician 2013;16(6):E749‐62. [PUBMED: 24284856] - PubMed
Widrig 2007 {published data only}
Zacher 2001 {published data only}
-
- Zacher J, Burger KJ, Farber L, Grave M, Abberger H, Bertsch K. Topical diclofenac versus oral ibuprofen: a double blind, randomized clinical trial to demonstrate efficacy and tolerability in patients with activated osteoarthritis of the finger joints (Heberden and/or Bouchard arthritis). Aktuelle Rheumatologie 2001;26:7‐14.
References to studies excluded from this review
Allegrini 2009 {published data only}
-
- Allegrini A, Nuzzo L, Pavone D, Tavella‐Scaringi A, Giangreco D, Bucci M, et al. Efficacy and safety of piroxicam patch versus piroxicam cream in patients with lumbar osteoarthritis. A randomized, placebo‐controlled study. Arzneimittel‐Forschung 2009;59(8):403‐9. - PubMed
Di Rienzo Businco 2004 {published data only}
-
- Rienzo Businco L, Rienzo Businco A, D'Emilia M, Lauriello M, Coen Tirelli G. Topical versus systemic diclofenac in the treatment of temporo‐mandibular joint dysfunction symptoms [Confronto diclofenac topico versus sistemico nel trattamento dei sintomi da disfunzione dell'articolazione temporo‐mandibolare]. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2004;24(5):279‐83. - PubMed
Doi 2010 {published data only}
-
- Doi T, Akai M, Fujino K, Hoshino Y, Iwaya T, Sunami Y. Effect of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug plasters for knee osteoarthritis in Japanese: a randomised controlled trial. Modern Rheumatology 2010;20:24‐33. - PubMed
Fotiades 1976 {published data only}
-
- Fotiades P, Bach GL. The effect of a flufenamic acid containing ointment in various rheumatic diseases [Wirkung einer flufenaminsaurehaltigen Salbe bei verschiedenen rheumatischen Erkrankungen]. Fortschritte der Medizin 1976;94:1036‐8. - PubMed
Galer 2010 {published data only}
-
- Galer BS. A comparative subjective assessment study of Pennsaid and Voltaren gel, two topical formulations of diclofenac sodium. Pain Practice 2011;11(3):252‐60. - PubMed
Geller 1980 {published data only}
-
- Geller O. Comparison of a salicylate heparin gel with a monosubstance preparation. Results of a double blind cross over study [Vergleich eines Salizylat/Heparin‐Gels mit einemMono‐substanzpräparat. Ergebnisse einer Doppelblindcross‐over‐Studie.]. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift 1980;122:1231‐2. - PubMed
Ginsberg 1991 {published data only}
-
- Ginsberg F, Famaey JP. Double‐blind, randomized cross‐over study of the percutaneous efficacy and tolerability of a topical indomethacin spray versus placebo in the treatment of tendinitis. Journal of Internal Medicine 1991;19:131‐6. - PubMed
Mattara 1994 {published data only}
-
- Mattara L, Trotta F, Biasi D, Cervetti R. Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of a new locally acting preparation of flurbiprofen in scapulohumeral periarthritis. European Journal of Rheumatology and Inflammation 1994;4:15‐20. - PubMed
Peniston 2011 {published data only}
Rovensky 2001 {published data only}
-
- Rovensky J, Micekova D, Gubzova Z, Fimmers R, Lenhard G, Vogtle‐Junkert U, et al. Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with a topical non‐steroidal antiinflammatory drug. Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study on the efficacy and safety of a 5% ibuprofen cream. Drugs Under Experimental and Clinical Research 2001;27:209‐21. - PubMed
Tiso 2010 {published data only}
-
- Tiso RL, Tong‐Ngork S, Fredlund KL. Oral versus topical ibuprofen for chronic knee pain: a prospective randomised pilot study. Pain Physician 2010;13:457‐67. - PubMed
Trnavský 2004 {published data only}
-
- Trnavský K, Fischer M, Vögtle‐Junkert U, Schreyger F. Efficacy and safety of 5% ibuprofen cream treatment in knee osteoarthritis. Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study. Journal of Rheumatology 2004;31(3):565‐72. - PubMed
Underwood 2008 {published data only}
-
- Underwood M, Ashby D, Carnes D, Castelnuovo E, Cross P, Harding G, et al. Topical or oral ibuprofen for chronic knee pain in older people. The TOIB study. Health Technology Assessment 2008;12:22. - PubMed
Verkleij 2015 {published data only}
-
- Verkleij SP, Luijsterburg PA, Willemsen SP, Koes BW, Bohnen AM, Bierma‐Zeinstra SM. Effectiveness of diclofenac versus paracetamol in knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial in primary care. British Journal of General Practice 2015;65(637):e530‐7. [DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X686101] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Vitali 1980 {published data only}
-
- Vitali G. Controlled clinical experiment with the topical use of 2‐(3‐benzoyl‐phenyl) propionic acid at 3 different concentrations [Sperimentazione clinica controllata sull'impiego topicodell'acido 2‐(3‐benzoil‐fenil) proprionico a tre diverse concentrazioni]. Clinical Therapeutics 1980;94:257‐73. - PubMed
References to studies awaiting assessment
Bohlooli 2012 {published data only}
Niempoog 2012 {published data only}
-
- Niempoog S, Siriarchavatana P, Kajsongkram T. The efficacy of Plygersic gel for use in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2012;95 Suppl 10:S113‐9. [PUBMED: 23451449] - PubMed
References to ongoing studies
NCT01377038 {unpublished data only}
-
- Phillips K (Principal investigator). Central pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis: a randomized, double‐blind, crossover study to evaluate the effectiveness of topical diclofenac versus duloxetine for chronic osteoarthritis pain. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01377038 (accessed 19 November 2015) 2015. [CTG: NCT01377038]
NCT02068859 {published data only}
-
- FPR Specialty Pharmacy. Treatment of knee pain with topical diclofenac cream 8% or diclofenac gel 1%. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02068859 (accessed 19 November 2015) 2014. [CTG: NCT02068859]
NCT02121002 {published data only}
-
- Prayag Shah, MD (Study director). A multi‐center, double‐blind, vehicle‐controlled, parallel‐group study comparing a generic diclofenac sodium topical gel, 1% to Voltaren® gel (diclofenac sodium topical gel) 1% in the treatment of subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02121002 (accessed 19 November 2015) 2015. [CTG: NCT02121002]
Additional references
Altman 2011
Bandolier 2005
-
- Anon. Topical analgesics: a review of reviews and a bit of perspective. www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/Extraforbando/Topextra3.pdf (accessed 18 November 2015) 2005.
Barthel 2010
Biswal 2006
-
- Biswal S, Medhi B, Pandhi P. Longterm efficacy of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in knee osteoarthritis: meta‐analysis of randomized placebo controlled clinical trials. Journal of Rheumatology 2006;33(9):1841‐4. - PubMed
Bjordal 2007
Conaghan 2014
-
- Conaghan PG, Bijlsma JW, Kneer W, Wise E, Kvien TK, Rother M. Drug‐free gel containing ultra‐deformable phospholipid vesicles (TDT 064) as topical therapy for the treatment of pain associated with osteoarthritis: a review of clinical efficacy and safety. Current Medical Research and Opinion 2014;30(4):599‐611. [DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860018] - DOI - PubMed
Cook 1995
Dechartres 2013
Derry 2012b
Derry 2013
Derry 2014
Derry 2015
Dougados 2000
-
- Dougados M, Leclaire P, Heijde D, Bloch DA, Bellamy N, Altman RD. Response criteria for clinical trials on osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a report of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials response criteria initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000;8(6):395‐403. [DOI: 10.1053/joca.2000.0361] - DOI - PubMed
Evans 1995
Fitzgerald 2001
Gaskell 2014
GRADEpro GDT 2015 [Computer program]
-
- McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.). GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. Available from www.gradepro.org (accessed 11 February 2016), 2015.
Haroutiunian 2010
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
Jadad 1996a
Jadad 1996b
L'Abbé 1987
-
- L'Abbé KA, Detsky AS, O'Rourke K. Meta‐analysis in clinical research. Annals of Internal Medicine 1987;107:224‐33. - PubMed
Lin 2004
Mason 2004a
Mason 2004b
McPherson 2013
Moore 1998a
Moore 1998b
Moore 2008a
Moore 2008b
-
- Moore RA, Barden J, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Managing potential publication bias. In: McQuay HJ, Kalso E, Moore RA editor(s). Systematic Reviews in Pain Research: Methodology Refined. Seattle: IASP Press, 2008:15‐24. [ISBN: 978‐0‐931092‐69‐5]
Moore 2010a
Moore 2010b
-
- Moore RA, Moore OA, Derry S, Peloso PM, Gammaitoni AR, Wang H. Responder analysis for pain relief and numbers needed to treat in a meta‐analysis of etoricoxib osteoarthritis trials: bridging a gap between clinical trials and clinical practice. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2010;69(2):374‐9. [DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.107805] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Moore 2012
Moore 2013
Morris 1995
NICE 2008
-
- National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. Osteoarthritis: National Clinical Guideline for Care and Management in Adults. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2008. [ISBN: 978‐1‐86016‐329‐6] - PubMed
NICE 2014
-
- Osteoarthritis. Care and management in adults. NICE clinical guideline 177. nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177/evidence 2014. [ISBN: 978‐1‐4731‐0426‐6]
Nüesch 2010
PaPaS 2012
-
- PaPaS author and referee guidance. http://papas.cochrane.org/papas‐documents (accessed 9 March 2015).
PCA 2015
-
- Prescribing and Medicines Team, Health and Social Care Information Centre. Prescription Cost Analysis, England 2014. www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB17274/pres‐cost‐anal‐eng‐2014‐rep.pdf (accessed 11 February 2016). The NHS Information Centre, 2015:309‐312. [ISBN: 978‐1‐78386‐365‐5]
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
-
- The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Roth 2011
Shainhouse 2010
Taylor 2011
Towheed 2006
Tramer 1997
Vos 2012
-
- Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380(9859):2163‐96. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical