A study of vocal nonlinearities in humpback whale songs: from production mechanisms to acoustic analysis - PubMed
- ️Fri Jan 01 2016
A study of vocal nonlinearities in humpback whale songs: from production mechanisms to acoustic analysis
Dorian Cazau et al. Sci Rep. 2016.
Abstract
Although mammalian vocalizations are predominantly harmonically structured, they can exhibit an acoustic complexity with nonlinear vocal sounds, including deterministic chaos and frequency jumps. Such sounds are normative events in mammalian vocalizations, and can be directly traceable to the nonlinear nature of vocal-fold dynamics underlying typical mammalian sound production. In this study, we give qualitative descriptions and quantitative analyses of nonlinearities in the song repertoire of humpback whales from the Ste Marie channel (Madagascar) to provide more insight into the potential communication functions and underlying production mechanisms of these features. A low-dimensional biomechanical modeling of the whale's U-fold (vocal folds homolog) is used to relate specific vocal mechanisms to nonlinear vocal features. Recordings of living humpback whales were searched for occurrences of vocal nonlinearities (instabilities). Temporal distributions of nonlinearities were assessed within sound units, and between different songs. The anatomical production sources of vocal nonlinearities and the communication context of their occurrences in recordings are discussed. Our results show that vocal nonlinearities may be a communication strategy that conveys information about the whale's body size and physical fitness, and thus may be an important component of humpback whale songs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df9/5056341/c0be467d6d05/srep31660-f1.gif)
Distributions of nonlinear measures ϕfj and ϕch, respectively on the left and on the right, in four different two-parameter bifurcation diagrams: left-right U-fold asymmetry /lung pressure
(diagram A), U-fold sizing
/lung pressure
(diagram B), size of the nasal cavities
/size of the laryngeal sac
(diagrams C,D). The
represents parameter values normalized by their nominal values from Table 3. The simulated vocalizations of diagram C have been obtained with an upward fundamental frequency modulation, and those of diagram D have been obtained with a laryngeal sac extension.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df9/5056341/8c581aa90dc6/srep31660-f2.gif)
The sound units (A–C,E,F) contain a box indicating the location of frequency jumps, with y-axis values. The sound unit D is short enough so we can distinctly visualize the frequency jump. Spectrogram parameters: sampling rate Fs: 44.1 kHz, frame size: 22 ms (1024 samples), 50% overlap (temporal resolution: 11 ms), FFT size: 1024 samples (spectral resolution: 11 Hz), Hamming window.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df9/5056341/cb0e907285a8/srep31660-f3.gif)
The solid black lines represent the ϕch curves. Spectrogram parameters: sampling rate Fs: 44.1 kHz, frame size: 22 ms (1024 samples), 50% overlap (temporal resolution: 11 ms), FFT size: 1024 samples (spectral resolution: 11 Hz), Hamming window.
![Figure 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df9/5056341/19635ccbf8de/srep31660-f4.gif)
Temporal evolution of the descriptors ϕfj and ϕch over four different songs (A–D) (see Table 2 for details). The difference in linewidths between the graphs is explained by their different number of sound units, from 1223 (in song A) to 116 (in song B).
![Figure 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df9/5056341/d9699b361a3a/srep31660-f5.gif)
(A) Photo of the U-fold, with a two-mass system drawn it. (B) Area function of sound production system of humpback whales. This area function is not anatomically accurate, as air flow makes a U-turn above the trachea towards the laryngeal sac (see Reidenberg and Laitman and Cazau et al. for details). However, this turn is supposed not to play a role in our sound production model. (C) Two-mass model scheme. On each of these subfigures, the layngeal region is framed in blue.
Similar articles
-
Sound production by singing humpback whales.
Mercado E 3rd, Schneider JN, Pack AA, Herman LM. Mercado E 3rd, et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Apr;127(4):2678-91. doi: 10.1121/1.3309453. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010. PMID: 20370048
-
All units are equal in humpback whale songs, but some are more equal than others.
Mercado E 3rd, Perazio CE. Mercado E 3rd, et al. Anim Cogn. 2022 Feb;25(1):149-177. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01539-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6. Anim Cogn. 2022. PMID: 34363127
-
Saloma A, Ratsimbazafindranahaka MN, Martin M, Andrianarimisa A, Huetz C, Adam O, Charrier I. Saloma A, et al. PeerJ. 2022 Aug 16;10:e13785. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13785. eCollection 2022. PeerJ. 2022. PMID: 35990903 Free PMC article.
-
Herman LM. Herman LM. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1795-1818. doi: 10.1111/brv.12309. Epub 2016 Nov 7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017. PMID: 28677337 Review.
-
Song Morphing by Humpback Whales: Cultural or Epiphenomenal?
Mercado E 3rd. Mercado E 3rd. Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 15;11:574403. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574403. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33519588 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Bidirectional Interactions With Humpback Whale Singer Using Concrete Sound Elements.
Pénitot A, Schwarz D, Nguyen Hong Duc P, Cazau D, Adam O. Pénitot A, et al. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:654314. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654314. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34177706 Free PMC article.
-
Harsh is large: nonlinear vocal phenomena lower voice pitch and exaggerate body size.
Anikin A, Pisanski K, Massenet M, Reby D. Anikin A, et al. Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20210872. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0872. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34229494 Free PMC article.
-
The Sonar Model for Humpback Whale Song Revised.
Mercado E III. Mercado E III. Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01156. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30061851 Free PMC article.
-
BASSA: New software tool reveals hidden details in visualisation of low-frequency animal sounds.
Jancovich BA, Rogers TL. Jancovich BA, et al. Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 3;14(7):e11636. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11636. eCollection 2024 Jul. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38962019 Free PMC article.
-
Acoustic allometry and vocal learning in mammals.
Garcia M, Ravignani A. Garcia M, et al. Biol Lett. 2020 Jul;16(7):20200081. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0081. Epub 2020 Jul 8. Biol Lett. 2020. PMID: 32634374 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Fitch W. T., Neubauer J. & Herzel H. Calls out of chaos: the adaptive significance of nonlinear phenomena in mammalian vocal production. Animal Behaviour 63, 407–418 (2002).
-
- Herzel H., Berry D., R T. I. & Steinecke L. Nonlinear dynamics of the voice: Signal analysis and biomechanical modeling. Chaos 30, 30–34 (1995). - PubMed
-
- Wilden I., Herzel H., Peters G. & Tembrock G. Subharmonic, biphonation, and deterministic chaos in mammal vocalization. Bioacoustics 9, 171–196 (1998).
-
- Payne R. & McVay S. Songs of humpback whales. Science 173, 585–597 (1971). - PubMed
-
- Cholewiak D. M., Sousa-Lima R. S. & Cerchio S. Humpback whale song hierarchical structure: Historical context and discussion of current classification issues. Marine Mammal Science 29, 312–332 (2013).
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials