Correlation between anti-PD-L1 tumor concentrations and tumor-specific and nonspecific biomarkers in a melanoma mouse model - PubMed
- ️Fri Jan 01 2016
Correlation between anti-PD-L1 tumor concentrations and tumor-specific and nonspecific biomarkers in a melanoma mouse model
Ana M Contreras-Sandoval et al. Oncotarget. 2016.
Abstract
Blockade of PD-L1 with specific monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD-L1) represents a therapeutic strategy to increase the capability of the immune system to modulate the tumor immune-resistance. The relationship between anti-PD-L1 tumor exposition and anti-tumor effect represents a challenge that has been addressed in this work through the identification of certain biomarkers implicated in the antibody's mechanism of action, using a syngeneic melanoma mouse model. The development of an in-vitro/in-vivo platform has allowed us to investigate the PD-L1 behavior after its blockage with anti-PD-L1 at cellular level and in animals. In-vitro studies showed that the complex PD-L1/anti-PD-L1 was retained mainly at the cell surface. The antibody concentration and time exposure affected directly the recycling or ligand turnover. In-vivo studies showed that anti-PD-L1 was therapeutically active at all stage of the disease, with a rapid onset, a low but durable efficacy and non-relevant toxic effect. This efficacy measured as tumor shrinkage correlated with tumor-specific infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which increased as antibody tumor concentrations increased. Both, TILS and antibody concentrations followed similar kinetic patterns, justifying the observed anti-PD-L1 rapid onset. Interestingly, peripheral lymphocytes (PBLs) behave as infiltrating lymphocytes, suggesting that these PBLs might be considered as a possible biomarker for antibody activity.
Keywords: anti-PD-L1 mAb; biomarkers; immunomodulation; melanoma model; preclinical study.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cfde/3cfdec87c701900fe151fb7d62fabe8c33702dd8" alt="Figure 1"
(A) In-vitro design: Cells seeded at density of 1 × 106 cells/well and exposure for 4 or 24 h at 5, 25 and 50 μg/mL of anti-PD-L were analysed by flow cytometer to quantify the PD-L1 availability over 48 h; at the same time, cells treated with 50 μg/mL for different times of exposure were fixed, stained and analyzed by con-focal microscopy. (B and C) represent the percentage of cells expressing PD-L1 over 48 h in control and after 4 h and 24 h exposure to three different antibody concentrations. Statistical differences were calculated between control and treatments and across times for each treatment (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p > 0.5). Data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (D and E) Immunohistochemical images show the location of PD-L1/ mAb in culture cells (green). Cells, incubated with 50 μg/mL anti-PD-L1 mAb at 37°C, were fluorescently labeled with mAb against anti-PD-L1 and with dapi for nuclei; upper panels correspond to cells treated for 4 h and visualized just after treatment, 4 h, and during 24 h post-treatment (panels D), and cells exposed continuously to the treatment for 24 h (panels E).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aba0/5aba03f222500539108afeef3d7219b386abf140" alt="Figure 2"
(A) experimental design for one cycle of treatment. Data are represented for control and treated groups according to different stages of the disease, small, medium and large tumor size; (B) Time profile of the mean tumor growth. Arrows show the starting time of the treatment at day 3, 7 and 11, respectively; (C) Time profile of the mean body weight; (D) Kaplan-Meier curve representing the results from the first cycle of treatment; (E–G) individual tumor growth kinetics. Symbols represent observations, solid lines mean tendency of control (black), responders and non-responders (different colours) and coloured dashed lines animals with a delayed effect. Arrows show the four doses corresponding to first cycle; (H) Individual tumor size represented by circles for control and treated groups (small, medium and large) just at the day of first and fourth dose administration and 24 h before starting the second cycle of treatment. Statistical differences were calculated across groups (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Overall data for the two cycles of treatment are shown in panels: (I) time profile of the mean body weight, and (J) Kaplan-Meier curve for the complete study.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/174b8/174b8664a98140157fabf503d14f351664b3d068" alt="Figure 3"
Observations were individually collected after first mAb dose administration (100 μg/mouse i.v.). (A) experimental design; (B) time profile of mAb concentrations in serum and tumor, respectively; (C) Specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, OVA-CD8+, vs. mAb tumor concentrations throughout 72 h post-dosing; (D) non-specific CD8+ vs. specific, OVA-CD8+ and (E) Individual time profiles of OVA-CD8+ vs. peripheral lymphocytes over 72 h. Symbols represent experimental data, solid lines the mean tendency, arrows dosing time and in panels C, D and E, black circles correspond to control data.
Similar articles
-
Huang A, Peng D, Guo H, Ben Y, Zuo X, Wu F, Yang X, Teng F, Li Z, Qian X, Qin FX. Huang A, et al. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 16;7:42687. doi: 10.1038/srep42687. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28202921 Free PMC article.
-
Hu Z, Ye L, Xing Y, Hu J, Xi T. Hu Z, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 9;8(1):217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18641-y. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 29317734 Free PMC article.
-
Hu X, Que W, Hirano H, Wang Z, Nozawa N, Ishii T, Ishizuka M, Ito H, Takahashi K, Nakajima M, Tanaka T, Zhu P, Guo WZ, Li XK. Hu X, et al. Cancer Sci. 2021 Jul;112(7):2652-2663. doi: 10.1111/cas.14930. Epub 2021 May 22. Cancer Sci. 2021. PMID: 33934440 Free PMC article.
-
TNFα blockade overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 in experimental melanoma.
Bertrand F, Montfort A, Marcheteau E, Imbert C, Gilhodes J, Filleron T, Rochaix P, Andrieu-Abadie N, Levade T, Meyer N, Colacios C, Ségui B. Bertrand F, et al. Nat Commun. 2017 Dec 22;8(1):2256. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02358-7. Nat Commun. 2017. PMID: 29273790 Free PMC article.
-
PD-L1 and immune escape: insights from melanoma and other lineage-unrelated malignancies.
Frydenlund N, Mahalingam M. Frydenlund N, et al. Hum Pathol. 2017 Aug;66:13-33. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Hum Pathol. 2017. PMID: 28694003 Review.
Cited by
-
Bansal A, Lavoie RR, Lucien F, Kethamreddy M, Wootla B, Dong H, Park SS, Pandey MK. Bansal A, et al. Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 22;14(1):19561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70385-8. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39174596 Free PMC article.
-
De Sousa Linhares A, Battin C, Jutz S, Leitner J, Hafner C, Tobias J, Wiedermann U, Kundi M, Zlabinger GJ, Grabmeier-Pfistershammer K, Steinberger P. De Sousa Linhares A, et al. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 7;9(1):11472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47910-1. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31391510 Free PMC article.
-
DNA methylation/hydroxymethylation in melanoma.
Fu S, Wu H, Zhang H, Lian CG, Lu Q. Fu S, et al. Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(44):78163-78173. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18293. eCollection 2017 Sep 29. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29100458 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Babikr F, Wan J, Xu A, Wu Z, Ahmed S, Freywald A, Chibbar R, Wu Y, Moser M, Groot G, Zhang W, Zhang B, Xiang J. Babikr F, et al. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021 Dec;18(12):2632-2647. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00796-4. Epub 2021 Nov 15. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021. PMID: 34782757 Free PMC article.
-
Merino M, Lozano T, Casares N, Lana H, Troconiz IF, Ten Hagen TLM, Kochan G, Berraondo P, Zalba S, Garrido MJ. Merino M, et al. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021 Apr 13;19(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00846-z. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021. PMID: 33849551 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Drake CG, Bivalacqua TJ, Hahn NM. Programmed cell death ligand-1 blockade in urothelial bladder cancer: to select or not to select. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3115–3116. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials