Coping with worry while waiting for diagnostic results: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples following a high-risk prenatal screening result - PubMed
- ️Fri Jan 01 2016
Coping with worry while waiting for diagnostic results: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples following a high-risk prenatal screening result
Stina Lou et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016.
Abstract
Background: It is well documented that pregnant women experience increased worry and uncertainty following a high-risk prenatal screening result. While waiting for diagnostic results this worry continues to linger. It has been suggested that high-risk women put the pregnancy mentally 'on hold' during this period, however, not enough is known about how high-risk women and their partners cope while waiting for diagnostic results. The aim of this study was to identify the strategies employed to cope with worry and uncertainty.
Methods: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 16 high-risk couples who underwent diagnostic testing. The couples were recruited at a university hospital fetal medicine unit in Denmark. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: All couples reported feeling worried and sad upon receiving a high-risk screening result. While waiting for diagnostic results, the couples focused on coming to their own understanding of the situation and employed both social withdrawal and social engagement as strategies to prevent worry from escalating. Additionally, couples used gratitude, reassuring reasoning and selective memory as means to maintain hopes for a good outcome. Discussions about what to do in case of an abnormal test result were notably absent in the accounts of waiting. This bracketing of the potential abnormal result allowed the couples to hold on to a 'normal' pregnancy and to employ an 'innocent-till-proven-guilty' approach to their worries about the fetus's health. None of the interviewed couples regretted having prenatal screening and all of them expected to have prenatal screening in a future pregnancy.
Conclusions: The couples in this study did not put the pregnancy mentally 'on hold'. Worry and uncertainty must be understood as managed through a diverse range of practical and emotional strategies that change and overlap in the process of waiting. Clinicians may support appropriate ways of coping with worry and waiting through empathetic and empowering clinical communication. In addition to providing adequate information and presenting options available, clinicians may support high-risk women/couples by encouraging them to seek their own personal understandings and management strategies as a way to gain some control in an uncertain situation.
Keywords: Coping; Denmark; First trimester screening; Pregnancy; Prenatal care; Qualitative; Worry.
Similar articles
-
Lou S, Lomborg K, Lewis C, Riedijk S, Petersen OB, Vogel I. Lou S, et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):791-801. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13813. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020. PMID: 31955407
-
Women's worries about prenatal screening tests suspected of fetal anomalies: a qualitative study.
Mirtabar SM, Pahlavan Z, Aligoltabar S, Barat S, Nasiri-Amiri F, Nikpour M, Behmanesh F, Taheri S, Nasri K, Faramarzi M. Mirtabar SM, et al. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 13;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02211-8. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36782219 Free PMC article.
-
Lou S, Carstensen K, Vogel I, Hvidman L, Nielsen CP, Lanther M, Petersen OB. Lou S, et al. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e026825. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026825. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30867204 Free PMC article.
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.
Schmidt L. Schmidt L. Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
-
Stress and anxiety associated with prenatal diagnosis.
Kowalcek I. Kowalcek I. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Apr;21(2):221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.11.009. Epub 2007 Jan 5. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007. PMID: 17208520 Review.
Cited by
-
Emadi E, Bordbar AK, Nadri H, Shams A, Taheri-Kafrani A, Kalantar SM. Emadi E, et al. RSC Adv. 2021 Sep 20;11(49):30990-31001. doi: 10.1039/d1ra05988b. eCollection 2021 Sep 14. RSC Adv. 2021. PMID: 35498932 Free PMC article.
-
Women's Concerns and Experiences of Fetal Anomaly Screening Process: A Qualitative Study.
Khakbazan Z, Farnam F, Abdollahi P, Arjmandifar M. Khakbazan Z, et al. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023 Jan;11(1):44-56. doi: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2022.96284.2116. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2023. PMID: 36650843 Free PMC article.
-
Women's experiences of counselling in cases of a screen-positive prenatal screening result.
Vuorenlehto L, Hinnelä K, Äyräs O, Ulander VM, Louhiala P, Kaijomaa M. Vuorenlehto L, et al. PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247164. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33690660 Free PMC article.
-
Møller A, Vogel I, Petersen OB, Lou S. Møller A, et al. J Pregnancy. 2018 Oct 9;2018:1646035. doi: 10.1155/2018/1646035. eCollection 2018. J Pregnancy. 2018. PMID: 30402287 Free PMC article.
-
Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Larsen MB, Andersen B. Kirkegaard P, et al. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 17;12:845-852. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S154959. eCollection 2018. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018. PMID: 29844660 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical