Molecular Targets of the Phytocannabinoids: A Complex Picture - PubMed
Review
Molecular Targets of the Phytocannabinoids: A Complex Picture
Paula Morales et al. Prog Chem Org Nat Prod. 2017.
Abstract
For centuries, hashish and marihuana, both derived from the Indian hemp Cannabis sativa L., have been used for their medicinal, as well as, their psychotropic effects. These effects are associated with the phytocannabinoids which are oxygen containing C21 aromatic hydrocarbons found in Cannabis sativa L. To date, over 120 phytocannabinoids have been isolated from Cannabis. For many years, it was assumed that the beneficial effects of the phytocannabinoids were mediated by the cannabinoid receptors, CB1 and CB2. However, today we know that the picture is much more complex, with the same phytocannabinoid acting at multiple targets. This contribution focuses on the molecular pharmacology of the phytocannabinoids, including Δ9-THC and CBD, from the prospective of the targets at which these important compounds act.
Keywords: CB1 receptor; CB2 receptor; CBC; CBD; CBDV; CBE; CBG; CBL; CBN; CBND; CBT; CBV; GPCR; Glycine receptor; PPARγ; Phytocannabinoid; THCV; TRPA1 channel; TRPM8 channel; TRPV1 channel; Δ8-THC; Δ9-THC.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/de3412ad8179/nihms849724f1.gif)
Structures of most abundant phytocannabinoids in Cannabis sativa L.
![Fig. 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/e78d67a80d78/nihms849724f2.gif)
Structures of phytocannabinoids in lower abundance.
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/980c76fd51bb/nihms849724f3a.gif)
(A) The typical Class A G-protein coupled receptor structure is illustrated here by the 2.8 Å structure of the mu opioid receptor (MOR; PDB entry 4DKL) (B) An extracellular view of the MOR structure is illustrated here. In MOR, the extracellular loops of the receptor are splayed open, making ligand access from the extracellular milieu possible. Here the covalent ligand, beta-funaltrexamine is bound.
![Fig. 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/980c76fd51bb/nihms849724f3a.gif)
(A) The typical Class A G-protein coupled receptor structure is illustrated here by the 2.8 Å structure of the mu opioid receptor (MOR; PDB entry 4DKL) (B) An extracellular view of the MOR structure is illustrated here. In MOR, the extracellular loops of the receptor are splayed open, making ligand access from the extracellular milieu possible. Here the covalent ligand, beta-funaltrexamine is bound.
![Fig. 4](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/5752720dc6ad/nihms849724f4.gif)
The 2.8 Å structure of the S1P1 receptor is illustrated here (PDB 3V2Y with antagonist, ML056). In this receptor, the N-terminus covers the EC side of the receptor, permitting no ligand access from the EC milieu. Instead, there is a portal between THH1 and TMH7 that allows ligand access from the lipid bilayer.
![Fig. 5](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/4b16cccb4b77/nihms849724f5.gif)
This figure shows results from molecular dynamics simulations in which the CB endogenous ligand, 2-AG enters the CB2 receptor from the lipid bilayer via a TMH6–TMH7 portal.
![Fig. 6](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/a4d706020fcd/nihms849724f6.gif)
Potential mechanisms of PPAR-phytocannabinoids interactions: A) Direct binding of phytocannabinoids to these nuclear receptors; B) Possible conversion of phytocannabinoids into metabolites that may activate PPARs; C) Phytocannabinoid transported to the nucleus by FABPs; D) Another possibility is that phytocannabinoids modulate CBR triggering intracellular signalling pathways that may lead to the activation of PPARs.
![Fig. 7](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/1f820ce55e47/nihms849724f7.gif)
The 2.8 Å structure of PPARγ with ajulemic acid is illustrated here (PDB 2OM9).
![Fig. 8](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/9a5c0d24e986/nihms849724f8.gif)
Structure of glycine receptors: pentamers formed by α and β subunits in a ratio of 2α:3β [116], each subunit consists of four transmembrane segments, the second transmembrane helix of each subunit forms the lining of the ion pore of these ligand-gated ion channels.
![Fig. 9](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/74090efc961c/nihms849724f9.gif)
General structure of the TRP channels modulated by phytocannabinoids: TRPV, TRPM and TRPA.
![Fig. 10](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cf8/5345356/6a9cf678a58f/nihms849724f10.gif)
The 3.27 Å structure of the TRPV1 channel is illustrated here.
Similar articles
-
Bioactive prenylogous cannabinoid from fiber hemp (Cannabis sativa).
Pollastro F, Taglialatela-Scafati O, Allarà M, Muñoz E, Di Marzo V, De Petrocellis L, Appendino G. Pollastro F, et al. J Nat Prod. 2011 Sep 23;74(9):2019-22. doi: 10.1021/np200500p. Epub 2011 Sep 8. J Nat Prod. 2011. PMID: 21902175
-
Pertwee RG. Pertwee RG. Br J Pharmacol. 2008 Jan;153(2):199-215. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707442. Epub 2007 Sep 10. Br J Pharmacol. 2008. PMID: 17828291 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Romano B, Pagano E, Orlando P, Capasso R, Cascio MG, Pertwee R, Marzo VD, Izzo AA, Borrelli F. Romano B, et al. Pharmacol Res. 2016 Nov;113(Pt A):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.07.045. Epub 2016 Aug 3. Pharmacol Res. 2016. PMID: 27498155
-
Navarro G, Varani K, Lillo A, Vincenzi F, Rivas-Santisteban R, Raïch I, Reyes-Resina I, Ferreiro-Vera C, Borea PA, Sánchez de Medina V, Nadal X, Franco R. Navarro G, et al. Pharmacol Res. 2020 Sep;159:104940. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104940. Epub 2020 May 26. Pharmacol Res. 2020. PMID: 32470563
-
Molecular Pharmacology of Phytocannabinoids.
Turner SE, Williams CM, Iversen L, Whalley BJ. Turner SE, et al. Prog Chem Org Nat Prod. 2017;103:61-101. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45541-9_3. Prog Chem Org Nat Prod. 2017. PMID: 28120231 Review.
Cited by
-
Remiszewski P, Malinowska B. Remiszewski P, et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022 Sep 7;15(9):1119. doi: 10.3390/ph15091119. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36145339 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Schlienz NJ, Scalsky R, Martin EL, Jackson H, Munson J, Strickland JC, Bonn-Miller MO, Loflin M, Vandrey R. Schlienz NJ, et al. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021 Dec;6(6):548-558. doi: 10.1089/can.2019.0096. Epub 2020 Jun 8. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021. PMID: 33998852 Free PMC article.
-
Kolbe MR, Hohmann T, Hohmann U, Maronde E, Golbik R, Prell J, Illert J, Strauss C, Dehghani F. Kolbe MR, et al. Cells. 2023 Nov 17;12(22):2646. doi: 10.3390/cells12222646. Cells. 2023. PMID: 37998380 Free PMC article.
-
Krüger M, van Eeden T, Beswa D. Krüger M, et al. Plants (Basel). 2022 Dec 1;11(23):3330. doi: 10.3390/plants11233330. Plants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36501366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dziemitko S, Harasim-Symbor E, Chabowski A. Dziemitko S, et al. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023 Jan 6;14:20406223221143239. doi: 10.1177/20406223221143239. eCollection 2023. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2023. PMID: 36636553 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Mechoulam R, Gaoni Y. The absolute configuration of delta-1-tetrahydrocannabinol, the major active constituent of hashish. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967;12:1109. - PubMed
-
- Pomorska DK, do-Rego J-C, do-Rego J-L, Zubrzycka M, Janecka A. Opioid and Cannabinoid System in Food Intake. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22:1361. - PubMed
-
- Boychuk DG, Goddard G, Mauro G, Orellana MF. The effectiveness of cannabinoids in the management of chronic nonmalignant neuropathic pain: a systematic review. J oral facial pain headache. 2015;29:7. - PubMed
-
- Novack GD. Cannabinoids for treatment of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016;27:146. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous