Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed
Review
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Gustavo C Machado et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul.
Abstract
Background: While it is now clear that paracetamol is ineffective for spinal pain, there is not consensus on the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for this condition. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs for spinal pain.
Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and LILACS for randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs with placebo for spinal pain. Reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Grade of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. A between-group difference of 10 points (on a 0-100 scale) was used for pain and disability as the smallest worthwhile effect, as well as to calculate numbers needed to treat. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences or risk ratios with 95% CIs.
Results: We included 35 randomised placebo-controlled trials. NSAIDs reduced pain and disability, but provided clinically unimportant effects over placebo. Six participants (95% CI 4 to 10) needed to be treated with NSAIDs, rather than placebo, for one additional participant to achieve clinically important pain reduction. When looking at different types of spinal pain, outcomes or time points, in only 3 of the 14 analyses were the pooled treatment effects marginally above our threshold for clinical importance. NSAIDs increased the risk of gastrointestinal reactions by 2.5 times (95% CI 1.2 to 5.2), although the median duration of included trials was 7 days.
Conclusions: NSAIDs are effective for spinal pain, but the magnitude of the difference in outcomes between the intervention and placebo groups is not clinically important. At present, there are no simple analgesics that provide clinically important effects for spinal pain over placebo. There is an urgent need to develop new drug therapies for this condition.
Keywords: Analgesics; Low Back Pain; NSAIDs.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Machado GC, Maher CG, Ferreira PH, Pinheiro MB, Lin CW, Day RO, McLachlan AJ, Ferreira ML. Machado GC, et al. BMJ. 2015 Mar 31;350:h1225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1225. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 25828856 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wong JJ, Côté P, Ameis A, Varatharajan S, Varatharajan T, Shearer HM, Brison RJ, Sutton D, Randhawa K, Yu H, Southerst D, Goldgrub R, Mior S, Stupar M, Carroll LJ, Taylor-Vaisey A. Wong JJ, et al. Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):34-61. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3891-4. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 25827308
-
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain.
van Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Koes BW, Deyo RA. van Tulder MW, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000. PMID: 10796356 Updated. Review.
-
WITHDRAWN: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low-back pain.
van Tulder MW, Scholten RJ, Koes BW, Deyo RA. van Tulder MW, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(2):CD000396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000396.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17636636 Review.
-
Koes BW, Scholten RJ, Mens JM, Bouter LM. Koes BW, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Apr;56(4):214-23. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.4.214. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997. PMID: 9165992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Chen Y, Bi Q, Zhu Z, Zhang S, Xu J, Dou X, Mao W. Chen Y, et al. Arch Med Sci. 2018 Jul 10;16(4):964-973. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2018.77036. eCollection 2020. Arch Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 32542100 Free PMC article.
-
Zhang T, Li X, Zhou X, Zhan L, Wu F, Huang Z, Sun Y, Feng Y, Du Q. Zhang T, et al. JMIR Serious Games. 2024 Feb 12;12:e50089. doi: 10.2196/50089. JMIR Serious Games. 2024. PMID: 38345832 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary care patients' use of conventional and complementary medicine for chronic low back pain.
Rodondi PY, Bill AS, Danon N, Dubois J, Pasquier J, Matthey-de-l'Endroit F, Herzig L, Burnand B. Rodondi PY, et al. J Pain Res. 2019 Jul 10;12:2101-2112. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S200375. eCollection 2019. J Pain Res. 2019. PMID: 31372027 Free PMC article.
-
The Emotion Regulation of Acupuncture in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Neuroimaging Protocol.
Lai P, Cheng S, Chen X, Cheng F, Cheng J, Xin M, Zhu D, Li Z, Wu X, Zeng F. Lai P, et al. J Pain Res. 2024 Mar 1;17:817-825. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S450589. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38444878 Free PMC article.
-
Shaheed CA, Machado GC, Underwood M. Shaheed CA, et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Nov 26;70(701):576-577. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713549. Print 2020 Dec. Br J Gen Pract. 2020. PMID: 33243903 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical