Prevalence of serious psychological distress among slaughterhouse workers at a United States beef packing plant - PubMed
Prevalence of serious psychological distress among slaughterhouse workers at a United States beef packing plant
Jessica H Leibler et al. Work. 2017.
Abstract
Background: Workers in the animal slaughter and processing industry in the United States experience high rates of occupational injury as well as stressful work conditions, yet mental health in this workforce remains largely unstudied.
Objective: To assess prevalence of serious psychological distress (SPD) in a sample of industrial US slaughterhouse workers.
Participants: Workers at an industrial beef packing plant in Nebraska, United States (n = 137).
Methods: We interviewed workers using the Kessler-6, a well-validated measure of non-specific anxiety disorders, to assess SPD. We compared SPD prevalence with national estimates from 2009 CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Study.
Results: Prevalence of SPD among workers was 4.4%, compared to United States population-wide prevalence of 3.6%. Prevalence of mild and moderate psychological distress among these workers (14.6%) was also higher than national estimates. Recent occupational injury, work area and job activities were not associated with elevated prevalence of SPD. Non-Hispanic white workers experienced elevated prevalence of SPD compared to Hispanic or Latino workers (prevalence odds ratio: 6.4; CI: 1.3, 30.5; p = 0.012).
Conclusion: Workers at a US industrial slaughterhouse experienced higher prevalence of SPD compared to United States population-wide estimates, but occupational risk factors for this outcome were not identified.
Keywords: Abattoir; agricultural workers; occupational health psychology; occupational injury; stress.
Similar articles
-
The Psychological Impact of Slaughterhouse Employment: A Systematic Literature Review.
Slade J, Alleyne E. Slade J, et al. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Apr;24(2):429-440. doi: 10.1177/15248380211030243. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023. PMID: 34231439 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Leibler JH, Perry MJ. Leibler JH, et al. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 Jan;14(1):23-30. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1211283. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017. PMID: 27715500
-
Gu JK, Charles LE, Fekedulegn D, Ma CC, Violanti JM, Andrew ME. Gu JK, et al. J Safety Res. 2020 Sep;74:207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jul 15. J Safety Res. 2020. PMID: 32951785 Free PMC article.
-
Kim J. Kim J. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008 May;41(3):200-7. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.200. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18515998
-
Hepatitis in slaughterhouse workers.
Tariq H, Kamal MU, Makker J, Azam S, Pirzada UA, Mehak V, Kumar K, Patel H. Tariq H, et al. World J Hepatol. 2019 Jan 27;11(1):37-49. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v11.i1.37. World J Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 30705717 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
COVID-19 Effects on Livestock Production: A One Welfare Issue.
Marchant-Forde JN, Boyle LA. Marchant-Forde JN, et al. Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 30;7:585787. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.585787. eCollection 2020. Front Vet Sci. 2020. PMID: 33195613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dean E, Xu J, Jones AY, Vongsirinavarat M, Lomi C, Kumar P, Ngeh E, Storz MA. Dean E, et al. Nutr J. 2024 Oct 18;23(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01018-z. Nutr J. 2024. PMID: 39425106 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research needs for a food system transition.
McDermid SS, Hayek M, Jamieson DW, Hale G, Kanter D. McDermid SS, et al. Clim Change. 2023;176(4):41. doi: 10.1007/s10584-023-03507-2. Epub 2023 Apr 5. Clim Change. 2023. PMID: 37034009 Free PMC article.
-
The Psychological Impact of Slaughterhouse Employment: A Systematic Literature Review.
Slade J, Alleyne E. Slade J, et al. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Apr;24(2):429-440. doi: 10.1177/15248380211030243. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023. PMID: 34231439 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical