FOUNDER-FLUSH SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA: A LARGE-SCALE EXPERIMENT - PubMed
FOUNDER-FLUSH SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA: A LARGE-SCALE EXPERIMENT
Agustí Galiana et al. Evolution. 1993 Apr.
Abstract
A founder-flush-crash model of speciation has been proposed that may particularly apply to island and other colonizations. Previous laboratory experiments testing the model have given inconsistent results. We have conducted a large experiment with Drosophila pseudoobscura designed to meet the essential postulates of the model and to separately test some of the postulates. Forty-five experimental and 12 control populations have been studied during seven successive founder-flush-crash cycles, or about 50 generations. Sexual isolation tests yield significantly positive assortative mating in a few tests between pairs of experimental populations. Populations with fewer founders (N = 1 or 3) yield more significant instances of assortative mating than those with more founders (n = 5, 7, or 9), and this difference becomes statistically significant for pooled data. Only one of 15 population pairs tested three times (generations 25, 32, and 46) shows positive assortative mating in all three tests. No significant assortative mating occurs between control populations, including highly inbred ones. We conclude that although founder events may occasionally lead to the evolution of assortative mating and hence to speciation, our results do not support the claim that the founder-flush-crash model identifies conditions very likely to result in speciation events.
Keywords: Drosophila pseudoobscura; Hawaiian Drosophila; evolution of sexual isolation; founder principle; genetic drift; speciation.
© 1993 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Similar articles
-
SINGLE FOUNDER-FLUSH EVENTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION.
Rundle HD, Mooers AØ, Whitlock MC. Rundle HD, et al. Evolution. 1998 Dec;52(6):1850-1855. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02263.x. Evolution. 1998. PMID: 28565304
-
Regan JL, Meffert LM, Bryant EH. Regan JL, et al. J Evol Biol. 2003 Mar;16(2):302-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00521.x. J Evol Biol. 2003. PMID: 14635869
-
POSTMATING ISOLATION ANALYSIS IN FOUNDER-FLUSH EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.
Galiana A, González-Candelas F, Moya A. Galiana A, et al. Evolution. 1996 Apr;50(2):941-944. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03905.x. Evolution. 1996. PMID: 28568951 No abstract available.
-
The reality and importance of founder speciation in evolution.
Templeton AR. Templeton AR. Bioessays. 2008 May;30(5):470-9. doi: 10.1002/bies.20745. Bioessays. 2008. PMID: 18404703 Review.
-
The theory of speciation via the founder principle.
Templeton AR. Templeton AR. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011-38. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.1011. Genetics. 1980. PMID: 6777243 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila.
Nanda P, Singh BN. Nanda P, et al. J Biosci. 2012 Jun;37(2):359-74. doi: 10.1007/s12038-012-9193-7. J Biosci. 2012. PMID: 22581340 Review.
-
Templeton AR, Robertson RJ, Brisson J, Strasburg J. Templeton AR, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5426-32. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091093098. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001. PMID: 11344289 Free PMC article.
-
Origin of sexual isolation in Drosophila ananassae due to founder effects.
Nanda P, Singh BN. Nanda P, et al. Genetica. 2011 Jun;139(6):779-87. doi: 10.1007/s10709-011-9582-0. Epub 2011 May 28. Genetica. 2011. PMID: 21626152
-
Time in a bottle: the evolutionary fate of species discrimination in sibling Drosophila species.
Myers EM, Frankino WA. Myers EM, et al. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031759. Epub 2012 Feb 27. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 22384069 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases