A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome - PubMed
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Aug;31(5):524-533.
doi: 10.1037/adb0000280. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
Affiliations
- PMID: 28639815
- PMCID: PMC6039097
- DOI: 10.1037/adb0000280
Meta-Analysis
A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome
Brian T Pace et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug.
Abstract
Motivational interviewing (MI) theory proposes a process whereby a set of therapist behaviors has direct effects on client outcomes and indirect effects through in-session processes (e.g., client change talk). Despite clear empirical support for the efficacy of MI across settings, the results of studies evaluating proposed links between MI process and outcome have been less clear. In the present study, we used a series of multivariate meta-analyses to test whether there are differential relationships between specific MI-consistent and MI-inconsistent therapist behaviors, MI therapist global ratings, client change language, and clinical outcomes. Based on 19 primary studies (N = 2,614), we found a significant relationship between MI-consistent therapist behaviors and greater client change talk, as well as greater client sustain talk. Higher therapist global ratings (empathy and MI spirit) were significantly related to increased MI-consistent behaviors, decreased MI-inconsistent behaviors, increased client change talk, yet also increased client sustain talk. Therapist global ratings were not significantly related to clinical outcomes. Client sustain talk was a significant predictor of worse clinical outcomes, while client change talk was unrelated to outcome. Variability within the correlations indicated that MI-consistent and MI-inconsistent therapist behaviors were differentially related to therapist global ratings of empathy and MI spirit. Similar to past research, present findings provide equivocal support for hypothesized MI process outcome relationships. Clinical implications and future areas of MI mechanism research are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
(c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66d5a/66d5afc89e5f5920be78c8bd3bae9a4736ce7b43" alt="Figure 1"
Hypothesized pathways that facilitate behavior change in MI. Figure adapted from Miller, W. R., & Rose, G. S. (2009). Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. American Psychologist, 64(6), 527–537.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fe30/4fe301938077476adb541ffe3d295d637ba5ac92" alt="Figure 2"
Structure of the six separate MI comparisons and the 18 correlation types. Models 1a-f including a fixed effect at the correlation type level and a random effect at the study level. Models 2a-f including an additional random effect at the correlation type level. MICO = MI-consistent behavior; MIIN = MI-inconsistent behavior; CT = client change language; ST = client sustain language; OUT = outcome; EMP = therapist empathy; MIS = therapist MI spirit.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4855f/4855fd37acd6962204c6d69d30fe4757f5a817a0" alt="Figure 3"
Effect sizes in the MI causal model. Note: emp = therapist empathy and mis = MI spirit. * p < .05. ** p < .001.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/740a6/740a64c1a34b9c3e8ea36f0ffb5d2e7577a54a0c" alt="Figure 4"
Correlations between individual MI therapist behaviors and empathy and MI spirit ratings. The point estimated shows the aggregated correlation and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The plots depict MI-consistent (left) and MI-inconsistent (right) therapist behaviors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35b21/35b21433103cf4da1613b04f43fe81862546b6ee" alt="Figure 2"
A primary study inclusion flowchart.
Similar articles
-
Magill M, Walthers J, Figuereo V, Torres L, Montanez Z, Jackson K, Colby SM, Lee CS. Magill M, et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2023 Jan;144:108898. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2022.108898. Epub 2022 Oct 13. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2023. PMID: 36270197 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of a significant other on client change talk in motivational interviewing.
Apodaca TR, Magill M, Longabaugh R, Jackson KM, Monti PM. Apodaca TR, et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Feb;81(1):35-46. doi: 10.1037/a0030881. Epub 2012 Dec 10. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23231575 Free PMC article.
-
Apodaca TR, Borsari B, Jackson KM, Magill M, Longabaugh R, Mastroleo NR, Barnett NP. Apodaca TR, et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):631-8. doi: 10.1037/a0037296. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014. PMID: 25222170 Free PMC article.
-
Magill M, Apodaca TR, Borsari B, Gaume J, Hoadley A, Gordon REF, Tonigan JS, Moyers T. Magill M, et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Feb;86(2):140-157. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000250. Epub 2017 Dec 21. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29265832 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Romano M, Peters L. Romano M, et al. Psychother Res. 2016;26(2):220-40. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2014.954154. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Psychother Res. 2016. PMID: 25204407 Review.
Cited by
-
Gavarkovs AG. Gavarkovs AG. Front Public Health. 2019 May 9;7:116. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00116. eCollection 2019. Front Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31143761 Free PMC article.
-
Magill M, Bernstein MH, Hoadley A, Borsari B, Apodaca TR, Gaume J, Tonigan JS. Magill M, et al. Psychother Res. 2019 Oct;29(7):860-869. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1490973. Epub 2018 Jun 28. Psychother Res. 2019. PMID: 29954290 Free PMC article.
-
Coetzer-Liversage A, Stein LAR, Shuster CL, Bassett SS, Martin R, Clair Michaud M. Coetzer-Liversage A, et al. Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2360101. Epub 2024 May 30. Subst Use Misuse. 2024. PMID: 38816908
-
Motivational Interviewing Produces Change Talk in Smokers with Serious Mental Illness.
Billingsley BE, Steinberg ML. Billingsley BE, et al. J Dual Diagn. 2021 Apr-Jun;17(2):151-158. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2021.1896826. Epub 2021 Mar 16. J Dual Diagn. 2021. PMID: 33725471 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A sequential analysis of motivational interviewing technical skills and client responses.
Laws MB, Magill M, Mastroleo NR, Gamarel KE, Howe CJ, Walthers J, Monti PM, Souza T, Wilson IB, Rose GS, Kahler CW. Laws MB, et al. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Sep;92:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 19. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018. PMID: 30032941 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Apodaca TR, Jackson KM, Borsari B, Magill M, Longabaugh R, Mastroleo NR, Barnett NP. Which Individual Therapist Behaviors Elicit Client Change Talk and Sustain Talk in Motivational Interviewing? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2016;61:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.09.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Armstrong MJ, Mottershead TA, Ronksley PE, Sigal RJ, Campbell TS, Hemmelgarn BR. Motivational interviewing to improve weight loss in overweight and/or obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Motivational interviewing for weight loss. Obesity Reviews. 2011;12 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00892.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baer JS, Wells EA, Rosengren DB, Hartzler B, Beadnell B, Dunn C. Agency context and tailored training in technology transfer: A pilot evaluation of motivational interviewing training for community counselors. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2009;37(2):191–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.01.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous