In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices - PubMed

Affiliations

• PMID: 29179623
• DOI: 10.1177/1556264617743834

In Defense of the Questionable: Defining the Basis of Research Scientists' Engagement in Questionable Research Practices

Donald F Sacco et al. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

National Institutes of Health principal investigators reported their perceptions of the ethical defensibility, prevalence in their field, and their personal willingness to engage in questionable research practices (QRPs). Using ethical defensibility ratings, an exploratory factor analysis yielded a two-factor solution: behaviors considered unambiguously ethically indefensible and behaviors whose ethical defensibility was more ambiguous. In addition, increasing perceptions that QRPs affect science predicted reduced acceptability of QRPs, whereas increasing beliefs that QRPs are normative or necessary for career success predicted increased acceptability of QRPs. Perceptions that QRPs are risky were unrelated to QRP acceptability but predicted reduced extramural funding (i.e., researchers' lifetime extramural grants and total funding secured). These results identify risk (i.e., beliefs that QRPs are normative to stay competitive in one's field) and protective factors (i.e., beliefs that QRPs have a significant negative impact on society) related to QRP endorsement that could inform educational interventions for training research scientists.

Keywords: behavioral social science research; ethics; motives; questionable research practices; research funding.

Similar articles

• Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices.

  Sacco DF, Brown M, Bruton SV. Sacco DF, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Oct;25(5):1321-1337. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0065-x. Epub 2018 Sep 26. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30259269

• Questionable research practices in student final theses - Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor's perceived attitudes.

  Krishna A, Peter SM. Krishna A, et al. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203470. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30161249 Free PMC article.

• Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts.

  Bruton SV, Brown M, Sacco DF. Bruton SV, et al. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Jul;15(3):216-226. doi: 10.1177/1556264619894435. Epub 2019 Dec 21. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020. PMID: 31865855

• Essentials of research ethics for healthcare professionals.

  Aita M, Richer MC. Aita M, et al. Nurs Health Sci. 2005 Jun;7(2):119-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2005.00216.x. Nurs Health Sci. 2005. PMID: 15877688 Review.

• The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward.

  Keener SK, Kepes S, Torka AK. Keener SK, et al. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023 Sep;239:104005. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104005. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2023. PMID: 37625919 Review.

Cited by

• Testing an active intervention to deter researchers' use of questionable research practices.

  Bruton SV, Brown M, Sacco DF, Didlake R. Bruton SV, et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Nov 29;4:24. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0085-3. eCollection 2019. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019. PMID: 31798975 Free PMC article.

• Questionable research practices in competitive grant funding: A survey.

  Conix S, De Peuter S, Block A, Vaesen K. Conix S, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293310. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37917785 Free PMC article.

• Investigating the links between questionable research practices, scientific norms and organisational culture.

  Brooker R, Allum N. Brooker R, et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024 Oct 14;9(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41073-024-00151-x. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2024. PMID: 39397013 Free PMC article.

• Institutional Approaches to Research Integrity in Ghana.

  Laar AK, Redman BK, Ferguson K, Caplan A. Laar AK, et al. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3037-3052. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00257-7. Epub 2020 Aug 10. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020. PMID: 32779114 Free PMC article. Review.

• Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns.

  Neoh MJY, Carollo A, Lee A, Esposito G. Neoh MJY, et al. R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Oct 18;10(10):230677. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230677. eCollection 2023 Oct. R Soc Open Sci. 2023. PMID: 37859842 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Atypon

• Other Literature Sources

  • scite Smart Citations