Phoretic Poecilochirus mites specialize on their burying beetle hosts - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2017
. 2017 Nov 7;7(24):10743-10751.
doi: 10.1002/ece3.3591. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Affiliations
- PMID: 29299254
- PMCID: PMC5743630
- DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3591
Phoretic Poecilochirus mites specialize on their burying beetle hosts
Volker Nehring et al. Ecol Evol. 2017.
Abstract
Recurring species interactions can cause species to adapt to each other. Specialization will increase the fitness of symbionts in the coevolved association but may reduce the flexibility of symbiont choice as it will often decrease fitness in interactions with other than the main symbiont species. We analyzed the fitness interactions between a complex of two cryptic mite species and their sympatric burying beetle hosts in a European population. Poecilochirus mites (Mesostigmata, Parasitidae) are phoretic on burying beetles and reproduce alongside beetles, while these care for their offspring at vertebrate carcasses. While Poecilochirus carabi is typically found on Nicrophorus vespilloides beetles, P. necrophori is associated with N. vespillo. It has long been known that the mites discriminate between the two beetle species, but the fitness consequences of this choice remained unknown. We experimentally associated both mite species with both beetle species and found that mite fitness suffered when mites reproduced alongside a nonpreferred host. In turn, there is evidence that one of the beetle species is better able to cope with the mite species they are typically associated with. The overall fitness effect of mites on beetles was negative in our laboratory experiments. The Poecilochirus mites studied here are thus specialized competitors or parasites of burying beetles.
Keywords: burying beetles; coevolution; cryptic species; host specialization; mites; parasites.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c8a8/7c8a850013ef7d014cec57acee6b8a5a00f4805b" alt="Figure 1"
Deutonymphs of the mite Poecilochirus carabi use burying beetles for transport, here on the ventral side of their preferred host species, Nicrophorus vespilloides
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da178/da178991cac8babf8b7aab6755fb77bb417702dd" alt="Figure 2"
Total brood mass was comparable between N. vespilloides and N. vespillo beetles and was not influenced by mite presence or species (no mites, blue; Pvo: P. necrophori, red; Pvs: P. carabi, black). Boxplots depict median (thick line), interquartile range (box), minimum and maximum. Numbers above boxes are sample sizes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c40c/5c40c7a1cae54736a89fc5dc747fd1ea2aa5a524" alt="Figure 3"
Mite fitness depends on the combination of mite fitness and beetle fitness. Each mite species has a higher fitness with the beetles it is typically found on (P. necrophori (Pvo, red) with N. vespillo (Nvo); P. carabi (Pvs, black) with N. vespilloides (Nvs)). Numbers are sample sizes; ***p < .001 in a maximum likelihood test
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b187/3b18765c2ac4b0fbd4fadc9342b835a72c22f1aa" alt="Figure 4"
Beetle fitness (measured as total brood mass) and mite fitness (offspring per 10 individuals) are overall negatively correlated, indicating that the mites are parasites. P. carabi (Pvs, black) prefers N. vespilloides beetles (Nvs, (a)), and P. necrophori (Pvo, red) prefers N. vespillo (Nvo, (b)). Beetle fitness is also higher when beetles are paired with their specialized mites (solid regression lines of preferred combinations are above those of dashed alternatives)
Similar articles
-
Sun SJ, Kilner RM. Sun SJ, et al. Ecol Evol. 2024 Jan 7;14(1):e10837. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10837. eCollection 2024 Jan. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 38192905 Free PMC article.
-
Canitz J, Sikes DS, Knee W, Baumann J, Haftaro P, Steinmetz N, Nave M, Eggert AK, Hwang W, Nehring V. Canitz J, et al. Mol Ecol. 2022 Jan;31(2):658-674. doi: 10.1111/mec.16248. Epub 2021 Nov 10. Mol Ecol. 2022. PMID: 34704311
-
Dose-independent virulence in phoretic mites that parasitize burying beetles.
Nehring V, Teubner H, König S. Nehring V, et al. Int J Parasitol. 2019 Sep;49(10):759-767. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Int J Parasitol. 2019. PMID: 31401062
-
Phoretic mites associated with animal and human decomposition.
Perotti MA, Braig HR. Perotti MA, et al. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009 Oct;49(1-2):85-124. doi: 10.1007/s10493-009-9280-0. Epub 2009 Jun 26. Exp Appl Acarol. 2009. PMID: 19557527 Review.
-
Revisiting the ecology and evolution of burying beetle behavior (Staphylinidae: Silphinae).
Potticary AL, Belk MC, Creighton JC, Ito M, Kilner R, Komdeur J, Royle NJ, Rubenstein DR, Schrader M, Shen SF, Sikes DS, Smiseth PT, Smith R, Steiger S, Trumbo ST, Moore AJ. Potticary AL, et al. Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug 20;14(8):e70175. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70175. eCollection 2024 Aug. Ecol Evol. 2024. PMID: 39170054 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Fitness costs of phoretic nematodes in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.
Wang Y, Rozen DE. Wang Y, et al. Ecol Evol. 2018 Dec 19;9(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4570. eCollection 2019 Jan. Ecol Evol. 2018. PMID: 30680093 Free PMC article.
-
Schedwill P, Paschkewitz S, Teubner H, Steinmetz N, Nehring V. Schedwill P, et al. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 21;15(1):e0228047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228047. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31961905 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid adaptation in phoretic mite development time.
Schedwill P, Geiler AM, Nehring V. Schedwill P, et al. Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 7;8(1):16460. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34798-6. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30405194 Free PMC article.
-
Ayala-Ortiz CO, Farriester JW, Pratt CJ, Goldkamp AK, Matts J, Hoback WW, Gustafson JE, Hagen DE. Ayala-Ortiz CO, et al. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0255660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255660. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34555059 Free PMC article.
-
Conflict within species determines the value of a mutualism between species.
Sun SJ, Horrocks NPC, Kilner RM. Sun SJ, et al. Evol Lett. 2019 Mar 6;3(2):185-197. doi: 10.1002/evl3.109. eCollection 2019 Apr. Evol Lett. 2019. PMID: 31007944 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Arce, A. N. , Johnston, P. R. , Smiseth, P. T. , & Rozen, D. E. (2012). Mechanisms and fitness effects of antibacterial defences in a carrion beetle. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25, 930–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02486.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baker, A. S. , & Schwarz, H. H. (1997). Morphological differences between sympatric populations of the Poecilochirus carabi complex (Acari: Mesostigmata: Parasitidae) associated with burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus). Systematic Parasitology, 37, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005822702267 - DOI
-
- Bartlett, J. (1987). Filial cannibalism in burying beetles. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21, 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00303208 - DOI
-
- Bartlett, J. , & Ashworth, C. M. (1988). Brood size and fitness in Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 22, 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294981 - DOI
-
- Beninger, C. W. (1993). Egg predation by Poecilochirus carabi (Mesostigmata, Parasitidae) and its effect on reproduction of Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Environmental Entomology, 22, 766–769. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/22.4.766 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources