Prepuce sparing: Use of Z-plasty for treatment of phimosis and scarred foreskin - PubMed
. 2018 Dec;14(6):545.e1-545.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
Affiliations
- PMID: 29909192
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.031
Prepuce sparing: Use of Z-plasty for treatment of phimosis and scarred foreskin
Michael Benson et al. J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Dec.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: The desire to preserve the prepuce is often based on cultural norms. Recently, the concept of "genital autonomy" has been invoked to delay circumcision (or any genital altering procedure) until the individual reaches maturity and can make his or her own decision. However, some uncircumcised boys develop one or more episodes of balanitis resulting in scarring of the prepuce and pathologic phimosis which is difficult to treat. Herein we report on the management of severe phimosis and preputial scarring using preputial Z-plasties.
Materials and methods: We reviewed the records of 28 patients, aged 3-12 years who underwent prepuce-sparing surgery within the previous 5 years with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. All patients were uncircumcised, with severe phimosis defined as a tight, pinpoint opening. All patients failed to respond to 6-10 weeks of betamethasone treatment. All parents requested preservation of as much of the foreskin as possible.
Results: All patients healed satisfactorily, without infection, hematoma, or flap necrosis. One child developed mild scarring which responded to local steroid application. At follow-up evaluation, ranging from 6 to 24 months, the prepuce was fully retractable in all patients (Fig.).
Conclusions: Excision of the scarred preputial ring results in a circular suture line, which is in essence a straight line, curved and connected at each end, and this is likely to contract over time. The principle of Z-plasty can be exploited to elongate and interrupt the straight line, preventing contracture thus widening and sparing the prepuce.
Keywords: Circumcision; Phimosis; Preputioplasty; Z-plasty.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Prepuce-sparing plasty and simple running suture for phimosis.
Monarca C, Rizzo MI, Quadrini L, Sanese G, Prezzemoli G, Scuderi N. Monarca C, et al. G Chir. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1-2):38-41. G Chir. 2013. PMID: 23463932
-
The prepuce: preservation and reconstruction.
Haseebuddin M, Brandes SB. Haseebuddin M, et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2008 Nov;18(6):575-82. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328311c9c2. Curr Opin Urol. 2008. PMID: 18832942 Review.
-
"Trident" preputial plasty for phimosis in childhood.
Pedersini P, Parolini F, Bulotta AL, Alberti D. Pedersini P, et al. J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Jun;13(3):278.e1-278.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 15. J Pediatr Urol. 2017. PMID: 28359779
-
Retractable foreskin reduces urinary tract infections in infant boys with vesicoureteral reflux.
Holzman SA, Chamberlin JD, Davis-Dao CA, Le DT, Delgado VA, Macaraeg AM, Dorgalli C, Chuang KW, Stephany HA, Wehbi EJ, Khoury AE. Holzman SA, et al. J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Apr;17(2):209.e1-209.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Jan 9. J Pediatr Urol. 2021. PMID: 33516608
-
[Prepuce in boys and adolescents: what when, and how?].
Dobanovacki D, Lucić Prostran B, Sarac D, Antić J, Petković M, Lakić T. Dobanovacki D, et al. Med Pregl. 2012 Jul-Aug;65(7-8):295-300. doi: 10.2298/mpns1208295d. Med Pregl. 2012. PMID: 22924249 Review. Serbian.
Cited by
-
Falagario UG, Piramide F, Pang KH, Durukan E, Tzelves L, Ricapito A, Baekelandt L, Checcucci E, Carrion DM, Bettocchi C, Esperto F. Falagario UG, et al. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 2;60(5):758. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050758. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024. PMID: 38792941 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Carmine P, Mario F, Antonio G, Vincenzo M, Elisa G, Angelo C, Gorizio P, Sara I. Carmine P, et al. BMC Urol. 2021 Feb 3;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00782-y. BMC Urol. 2021. PMID: 33535998 Free PMC article.
-
Preputioplasty as a surgical alternative in treatment of phimosis.
Osmonov D, Hamann C, Eraky A, Kalz A, Melchior D, Bergholz R, Romero-Otero J. Osmonov D, et al. Int J Impot Res. 2022 May;34(4):353-358. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00505-9. Epub 2021 Dec 1. Int J Impot Res. 2022. PMID: 34853437 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Phimosis in Adults: Narrative Review of the New Available Devices and the Standard Treatments.
Rosato E, Miano R, Germani S, Asimakopoulos AD. Rosato E, et al. Clin Pract. 2024 Feb 18;14(1):361-376. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010028. Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 38391414 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Male esthetic genital surgery: recommendations and gaps to be filled.
Bettocchi C, Checchia AA, Falagario UG, Ricapito A, Busetto GM, Cormio L, Carrieri G. Bettocchi C, et al. Int J Impot Res. 2022 May;34(4):392-403. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00556-6. Epub 2022 Apr 5. Int J Impot Res. 2022. PMID: 35383340 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical