pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks - PubMed

. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):81-91.

doi: 10.1002/acp.3170. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

Affiliations

Super-recognisers in Action: Evidence from Face-matching and Face Memory Tasks

Anna K Bobak et al. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Individuals employed in forensic or security settings are often required to compare faces of ID holders to document photographs, or to recognise the faces of suspects in closed-circuit television footage. It has long been established that both tasks produce a high error rate amongst typical perceivers. This study sought to determine the performance of individuals with exceptionally good face memory ('super-recognisers') on applied facial identity matching and memory tasks. In experiment 1, super-recognisers were significantly better than controls when matching target faces to simultaneously presented line-ups. In experiment 2, super-recognisers were also better at recognising faces from video footage. These findings suggest that super-recognisers are more accurate at face matching and face memory tasks than typical perceivers, and they could be valuable expert employees in national security and forensic settings.

© 2015 The Authors Applied Cognitive Psychology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

An example trial from a face‐matching array (Bruce et al., 1999; not drawn to scale). The target or probe is a video still. The images are those paired with the target by Bruce et al. (1999). The target is present in position 5

Figure 2
Figure 2

Proportion of hits (A), CRs (B) and d′ (C) on the 1‐in‐10 task in experiment 1 plotted against Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) score. The dependent variable in the CFMT is the number of correct responses from a maximum score of 72. SRs, super‐recognisers

Figure 3
Figure 3

Example stimuli from study and test (not drawn to scale) in experiment 2. The target is present in the video clip on the right

Figure 4
Figure 4

Proportion of hits (A), CRs (B) and d′ (C) on the face memory task in experiment 2 plotted against Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) score. The dependent variable in the CFMT is the number correct from a maximum score of 72. SRs, super‐recognisers

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BBC News (2014). Thousands attend Notting Hill Carnival in west London. Retrieved 08/26, 2014, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-28917765.
    1. Bindemann, M. , Brown, C. , Koyas, T. , & Russ, A. (2012). Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(2), 96–103. DOI:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001. - DOI
    1. Bowles, D. C. , McKone, E. , Dawel, A. , Duchaine, B. , Palermo, R. , Schmalzl, L. , … & Yovel, G. (2009). Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(5), 423–455. DOI:10.1080/02643290903343149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bobak, A. K. , Bennetts, R. J. , Parris, B. , Jansari, A. , & Bate, S. (in preparation). Verification of face identities from images captured on video
    1. Braje, W. L. (2003). Illumination encoding in face recognition: effect of position shift. Journal of Vision, 3(2), 4 DOI:10.1167/3.2.4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources