Trauma, Temperament, Alexithymia, and Dissociation Among Persons Addicted to Alcohol: Mediation Model of Dependencies - PubMed
- ️Mon Jan 01 2018
Trauma, Temperament, Alexithymia, and Dissociation Among Persons Addicted to Alcohol: Mediation Model of Dependencies
Elżbieta Zdankiewicz-Ścigała et al. Front Psychol. 2018.
Abstract
Objective: The attachment theory has been conceptualized as an affect regulation theory, proposing that attachment is associated with the expression and recognition of emotions as well as interpersonal functioning. The purpose of the study was to examine a model, in which a relation was analyzed between childhood trauma, temperament, alexithymia, and dissociation in a group of individuals addicted to alcohol. Method: The total number of 201 persons were examined, comprising 67 women (33.3% of participants) and 134 men (66.7% of participants). The participants aged from 18 to 68 (M = 32.81; SD = 12.12). In order to measure the analyzed variables, the following questionnaires were applied: MAST, SSSV, TAS20, TEC, and CES. Results: A comparative analysis between the group of alcohol addicts and non-addicts showed statistically significant differences related to: the intensity of trauma, temperament, alexithymia, and dissociation. The study of models related to the impact of traumatic experience intensity on the level of alcohol addiction with regard to a mediatory role of alexithymia, dissociation, and temperament showed the existence of several important indirect effects, and the model, which takes into account all three mediators, is statistically significant F(4,196) = 35.1964; p < 0.001. Conclusion: Childhood trauma, as well as alexithymia and dissociation block dealing with stress based on self-reflection and self-control, and contribute to affective disorders and their regulation with alcohol. Limitations: The selection of participants to homogeneous groups with regard to age and gender constituted the most important difficulty and limitation. A perfect age criterion for investigating the interaction between the temperament and the consequences of traumatic development would be early adulthood.
Keywords: addiction; alexithymia; dissociation; temperament; trauma.
Figures

The model of mediation for the impact of trauma intensity alexithymia level on an inclination toward alcohol addiction with the mediation impact of alexithymia. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Direct effect – X on Y without the influence of M1 – c. Indirect effect of X on Y through M1 – a, b. Direct effect – X on Y including the influence of M1 – c‘.

The model of mediation for the tendency toward dissociation between the impact of trauma intensity on the level of alcohol addiction. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Direct effect – X on Y without the influence of M1 – c. Indirect effect of X on Y through M1 – a, b. Direct effect – X on Y including the influence of M1 – c‘.

The model of mediation for the impact of traumatic experiences’ intensity on the inclination toward alcohol addiction, with three mediators, i.e.: alexithymia, dissociation, and sensation seeking. Below, intermediate effects were described, which were calculated in the model. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Direct effect – X on Y without the influence of M1, M2 or M3 – c. Effect 1 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Addiction – significant a1, b1. Effect 2 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Dissociation – > Addiction – significant a1, d21, b2. Effect 3 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Sensation seeking – > Addiction – N.I. a1, d31, b3. Effect 4 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Dissociation – > Sensation seeking – > Addiction – N.I. a1, d21, d32, b3. Effect 5 – Trauma – > Dissociation – > Addiction – significant a2, b2. Effect 6 – Trauma – > Dissociation – > Sensation seeking – > Addiction – N.I. a2, d32, b3. Effect 7 – Trauma – > Sensation seeking – > Addiction – N.I. a3, b3. Direct effect – X on Y including the influence of M1, M2 and M3 – c‘.

The model of mediation for the impact of traumatic experiences’ intensity on the inclination toward alcohol addiction, with three mediators, i.e.: alexithymia, dissociation, and disinhibition. Below, paths were described, which were calculated in the model. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01. Direct effect – X on Y without the influence of M1, M2 or M3 – c. Effect 1 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Addiction – significant a1, b1. Effect 2 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Dissociation – > Addiction – significant a1, d21, b2. Effect 3 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Disinhibition – > Addiction – N.I. a1, d31, b3. Effect 4 – Trauma – > Alexithymia – > Dissociation – > Disinhibition – > Addiction – significant a1, d21, d32, b3. Effect 5 – Trauma – > Dissociation – > Addiction – significant a2, b2. Effect 6 – Trauma – > Dissociation – > Disinhibition – > Addiction – significant a2, d32, b3. Effect 7 – Trauma – > Disinhibition – > Addiction – significant a3, b3. Direct effect – X on Y including the influence of M1, M2 and M3 – c.
Similar articles
-
Zdankiewicz-Ścigała E, Ścigała DK. Zdankiewicz-Ścigała E, et al. Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 30;9:2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02039. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30425669 Free PMC article.
-
Zdankiewicz-Ścigała E, Ścigała DK. Zdankiewicz-Ścigała E, et al. Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 24;10:2957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02957. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32038366 Free PMC article.
-
The Relationships between Early Trauma, Dissociation, and Alexithymia in Alcohol Addiction.
Craparo G, Ardino V, Gori A, Caretti V. Craparo G, et al. Psychiatry Investig. 2014 Jul;11(3):330-5. doi: 10.4306/pi.2014.11.3.330. Epub 2014 Jul 21. Psychiatry Investig. 2014. PMID: 25110508 Free PMC article.
-
[Problems in the development of emotional expression--dictated by temperament or environment?].
Toukola T, Karukivi M, Saarijärvi S. Toukola T, et al. Duodecim. 2015;131(21):1988-94. Duodecim. 2015. PMID: 26677549 Review. Finnish.
-
Non-declarative representational and regulatory systems in alexithymia.
Helling J. Helling J. J Trauma Dissociation. 2009;10(4):469-87. doi: 10.1080/15299730903143675. J Trauma Dissociation. 2009. PMID: 19821180 Review.
Cited by
-
Topino E, Pallaoro N, Moyano M, Casale S, Gori A. Topino E, et al. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024 Jun;21(3):217-224. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240307. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38988680 Free PMC article.
-
Yang JH, Rhee SJ, Park CHK, Kim MJ, Shin D, Lee JW, Kim J, Kim H, Lee HJ, Ha K, Ahn YM. Yang JH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Feb 1;36(5):e39. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e39. J Korean Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33527782 Free PMC article.
-
Marzilli E, Cerniglia L, Cimino S, Tambelli R. Marzilli E, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 24;19(23):15582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315582. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36497656 Free PMC article.
-
Cheng F, Cui S, Zhang C, Zhang L, Wang L, Yuan Q, Huang C, Zhang K, Zhou X. Cheng F, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 13;11:792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00792. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32903659 Free PMC article.
-
Zdankiewicz-Ścigała E, Ścigała DK. Zdankiewicz-Ścigała E, et al. Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 30;9:2039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02039. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30425669 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen J. G., Fonagy P., Bateman A. (2014). Mentalizowanie w Praktyce Klinicznej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
-
- Bowlby J. (1988). A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. London: Routledge.
-
- Carlson E. A., Yates T. M., Sroufe L. A. (2009). “Dissociation and development of the self,” in Dissociation and the Dissociative Disorders. DSM-V and Beyond eds Dell P. F., O’Neil J. A. (New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; ) 39–53.
-
- Cierpiałkowska L. (2010). “Modele genetyczne i koncepcje psychologiczne zaburzeñ związanych z używaniem alkoholu,” in Psychologia Uzależnieñ – Alkoholizm eds Cierpiałkowska L., Ziarko M. (Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne; ) 113–187.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources