Assessing impact of exogenous features on biotic phenomena in the presence of strong spatial dependence: A lake sturgeon case study in natural stream settings - PubMed
- ️Mon Jan 01 2018
Assessing impact of exogenous features on biotic phenomena in the presence of strong spatial dependence: A lake sturgeon case study in natural stream settings
Andrew O Finley et al. PLoS One. 2018.
Abstract
Modeling spatially explicit data provides a powerful approach to identify the effects of exogenous features associated with biological processes, including recruitment of stream fishes. However, the complex spatial and temporal dynamics of the stream and the species' reproductive and early life stage behaviors present challenges to drawing valid inference using traditional regression models. In these settings it is often difficult to ensure the spatial independence among model residuals-a key assumption that must be met to ensure valid inference. We present statistical models capable of capturing complex residual anisotropic patterns through the addition of spatial random effects within an inferential framework that acknowledges uncertainty in the data and parameters. Proposed models are used to explore the impact of environmental variables on Lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) reproduction, particularly questions about patterns in egg deposition. Our results demonstrate the need to apply valid statistical methods to identify relationships between response variables, e.g., egg counts, across locations, and environmental covariates in the presence of strong and anisotropic autocorrelation in stream systems. The models may be applied to other settings where gamete distribution or, more generally, other biotic phenomena may be associated with spatially dynamic and anisotropic processes.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Left panel: star symbol on the inset map of Michigan indicates the Upper Black River study location. The inset box of the Upper Black River identifies the four spawning site locations with circle symbols. Right panels: provide a characterization of each spawning site with flow direction indicated with an arrow. River segment lengths over which measurements were taken are approximately 45, 25, 60, and 30 m, for Sites 1-4.

Underlying surfaces were generated by passing the given point values through an interpolator.


These fitted values can be compared to the observed egg counts illustrated in Fig 2(a).
Similar articles
-
Kessel ST, Hondorp DW, Holbrook CM, Boase JC, Chiotti JA, Thomas MV, Wills TC, Roseman EF, Drouin R, Krueger CC. Kessel ST, et al. J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):259-273. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12772. Epub 2017 Dec 5. J Anim Ecol. 2018. PMID: 29055094
-
Tillitt DE, Buckler JA, Nicks DK, Candrl JS, Claunch RA, Gale RW, Puglis HJ, Little EE, Linbo TL, Baker M. Tillitt DE, et al. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Apr;36(4):988-998. doi: 10.1002/etc.3614. Epub 2016 Nov 18. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017. PMID: 27600767
-
Population and evolutionary dynamics in spatially structured seasonally varying environments.
Reid JM, Travis JMJ, Daunt F, Burthe SJ, Wanless S, Dytham C. Reid JM, et al. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Aug;93(3):1578-1603. doi: 10.1111/brv.12409. Epub 2018 Mar 25. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018. PMID: 29575449 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Importance of environmental endocrinology in fisheries management and aquaculture of sturgeons.
Webb MA, Doroshov SI. Webb MA, et al. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011 Jan 15;170(2):313-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.11.024. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011. PMID: 21130093 Review.
Cited by
-
Duong TY, Bence J, Forsythe PS, Crossman JA, Baker EA, Sard NM, Scribner KT. Duong TY, et al. Ecol Evol. 2023 Jul 12;13(7):e10253. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10253. eCollection 2023 Jul. Ecol Evol. 2023. PMID: 37456069 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fausch KD, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW. Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes: A Continuous View of the River is Needed to Understand How Processes Interacting among Scales Set the Context for Stream Fishes and Their Habitat. BioScience. 2002;52(6):483–498. 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052%5B0483:LTRBTG%5D2.0.CO;2 - DOI
-
- Schlosser IJ, Angermeier P. Spatial variation in demographic processes of Lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. American Fisheries Society Symposium. 1995;17:392–401.
-
- Allan JD. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2004;35:257–284. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122 - DOI
-
- Esselman PC, Infante DM, Wang L, Wu D, Cooper AR, Taylor WW. An index of cumulative disturbance to river fish habitats of the conterminous United States from landscape anthropogenic activities. Ecological Restoration. 2011;29(1-2):133–151. 10.3368/er.29.1-2.133 - DOI
-
- Poff NL. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. Journal of the north american Benthological society. 1997;16(2):391–409. 10.2307/1468026 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
This work was supported by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011028, Dr. Kim T Scribner; the Great Lakes Fishery Trust, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001145, Dr. Kim T Scribner; National Science Foundation, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008982, DMS-1513481, Dr. Andrew O. Finley; and National Science Foundation, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008982, EF-1253225, Dr. Andrew O. Finley.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous