pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Responding to Sexual Objectification: The Role of Emotions in Influencing Willingness to Undertake Different Types of Action - PubMed

Responding to Sexual Objectification: The Role of Emotions in Influencing Willingness to Undertake Different Types of Action

Lee Shepherd. Sex Roles. 2019.

Abstract

Women may respond to being sexual objectified in different ways, such as confronting the perpetrator, ignoring the action, blaming oneself or considering the action as flattering. However, there has been little research looking at what predicts each of these different responses. The present research assessed the role of emotions in promoting and deterring different anticipated responses to sexual objectification. In both Studies 1 (n = 189) and 2 (n = 187), female participants were asked to imagine themselves in a situation where they received an inappropriate sexual comment. Participants then rated the emotions they believed they would feel and how they thought they would act in the situation. I found that expecting feelings of anger resulted in women thinking they would confront the perpetrator (i.e., undertake an active response) and that expecting disgust negatively predicted the belief that they would view the action as flattering (i.e., anticipate a benign response). By contrast, expecting shame resulted in women believing they would blame themselves (i.e., undertake a self-blame response). Study 2 also found that expecting pride was positively associated with anticipating a benign response. These findings suggest that the emotions that women expect to feel influence their anticipated responses to sexual objectification. It is, therefore, important to consider the emotional reactions that women have to instances of sexual objectification.

Keywords: Action tendency; Emotions; Objectification; Sexism; Sexual harassment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethical StandardsBoth studies were approved by the author’s Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was given by all participants. The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

The indirect effect of the sexual objectification manipulation on the anticipation of undertaking an active response via the expected emotions (Study 2). The values represent unstandardised betas and standard errors (in brackets). Pathways were regarded as significant if the p-value was below .0125. This was to correct for the family-wise error rate. *p < .0125. **p < .01. *** = p < .001

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

The indirect effect of the sexual objectification manipulation on the anticipation of undertaking a passive response via the expected emotions (Study 2). The values represent unstandardised betas and standard errors (in brackets). Pathways were regarded as significant if the p-value was below .0125. This was to correct for the family-wise error rate. *p < .0125. **p < .01. *** = p < .001

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The indirect effect of the sexual objectification manipulation on the anticipation of undertaking a self-blame response via the expected emotions (Study 2). The values represent unstandardised betas and standard errors (in brackets). Pathways were regarded as significant if the p-value was below .0125. This was to correct for the family-wise error rate. *p < .0125. **p < .01. *** = p < .001

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

The indirect effect of the sexual objectification manipulation on the anticipation of undertaking a benign response via the expected emotions (Study 2). The values represent unstandardised betas and standard errors (in brackets). Pathways were regarded as significant if the p-value was below .0125. This was to correct for the family-wise error rate. *p < .0125. **p < .01. *** = p < .001

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arbuckle JL. IBM SPSS Amos 22 User’s guide. New York: IBM; 2013.
    1. Ashburn-Nardo L, Blanchar JC, Petersson J, Morris KA, Goodwin SA. Do you say something when it's your boss? The role of perpetrator power in prejudice confrontation. Journal of Social Issues. 2014;70:615–636. doi: 10.1111/josi.12082. - DOI
    1. Ayres MM, Friedman CK, Leaper C. Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles. 2009;61:449–460. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9635-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bastian B, Denson TF, Haslam N. The roles of dehumanization and moral outrage in retributive justice. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061842. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Becker JC, Swim JK. Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily encounters with sexism as way to reduce sexist beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2011;35:227–242. doi: 10.1177/0361684310397509. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources